My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 12/13/1921
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1920s
>
Year 1921
>
Minutes 12/13/1921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2002 2:36:50 PM
Creation date
8/13/2002 2:25:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
12/13/1921
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
359 <br /> <br />December 13, 1921 <br /> <br />you ~econsider your a~tion of November 22nd, in relation to ~he bank tax for the years 1919 <br />and 1920. I am informed that there w~s some~ misunderstanding about what action the banks <br />had taken on the proposgtion contained in th~ letter of the City of September 22nd, 1921. <br />In that latter the City proposed To the banks to refunds%or the years iglg~a~d 1920, the <br />difference between the rate of 85~ mn the $100.O0, and ~he rate actually paid by the banks, <br />and stated that the 1921 rate would be 85, on $100.0Oo <br /> <br /> Under date of October 24th, I wrote Mr. L. C. Brlnson, City Clerk and Auditor, in <br />which letter I said for the banks that they would accept the proposition of the City so far <br />as it~related to the refund of the taxes for the years 1919 and 1920, and in & letter dated <br />November l~th, I wrote that the banks would also accept the 85~aX*~ate for 1921, and as a <br />matter of fact the banks have already paid their taxes a~ this ra~e for 1921. <br /> <br /> I understand that in the City of Richmond the banks and the City have settled on <br />this s~me basis ~nd the City has refunded ta~xes as far back as 1915. This ~as because suit <br />had been filed as early as 1915, for the correction of t~xes~ Of course the Portsmouth Banks <br />are only asking for 1919 and 1920. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br /> Frank L. Crocker," <br /> <br />the Council rescind its action taken November 22nd, 1921, <br /> <br /> When Mr. Esleeck moved that <br />with =egard ~o the bank tax. <br /> <br /> The motion by Mr. Esi~k~ adopte~'by the following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes-- Esleeok, Hall, Hutohins,~Smith, White, 5. <br /> Nays-- ~rooks, 1. (Hr. Oast excused from voting} <br /> <br /> Mr. Esteeck moved that the City accept the proposition made by the Finance Committee to <br />th~ Banks in letter dated ~eptember 22nd, and as cbntained in communication from Mr Crocker <br />dated November l~th. <br /> Mr. ~rooks moved thmt the rules be suspended to remain in session until 12 o'clock. <br /> The motion by M~r. Brooks was lost by the following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes-- Brooks, Esleeck, Hall, Hutchins, <br /> Nays-- Smith, White, ~. ~Mr'. Oast excused from voting) <br /> <br /> Then ~r. Brooks ~oved to adjourn. The motion was adopted. <br /> <br /> o <br /> <br />CITY CLERK ^~,~D ~IJDIToR; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.