My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 07/28/1925
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1920s
>
Year 1925
>
Minutes 07/28/1925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2002 2:27:33 PM
Creation date
5/1/2002 2:03:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
7/28/1925
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Referred June23=d <br /> <br />Spec. <br /> <br /> CommuniCation from the Na~ager-enclosing.letter from. Mr. Harry L. Alexander relative to <br />the 0ity purchasing property owned By him a~jacent tO the-Wy~he-St, playground. <br /> We do not deem it advisable to purchase +.his Droperty at the present time. <br /> <br /> Referred January <br /> <br /> Recommendation of the ~er that the fee of $25.00 charged the Veterans of Foreign Wars <br />for the use of the ~_,~!oipal Auditorium for'a dance, be refunded, as the heating plant broke <br />dawn amd as a result claim is made that the Veterans lost heavily by reason of the small <br />tendanceo <br /> It is recommended that a special appropriation of $~5.00 be allowed to make s~id <br />refund. <br /> <br /> It is farther recommended that the combined Oommuni~y Wall amd fire station in the <br />Ninth Ward be tooated on the eas~ side of Des Noines Avenue. <br /> (Signed) Vernon Brooks, 0h~irma~. <br /> <br /> On motion of'Mr. Stew~x.t (R~E.B.), the report was adopted, and by the following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes-- Brooks, .Naupin,~Smith, Stewa:~ (J,R,), <br /> Stewart (R.E.B.), .~ite, <br /> <br /> The following communications were read from the Oity Manager: <br /> <br />let. #After ¢arefai s~udy <br /> <br />of the ~nctne~to: problem, l.beg to report as follows: <br /> <br /> lsd- The new incinerator shout~ be installed in the present bmildi~gwith su&h modifica- <br />tions of that building as are required for the new installatiom. <br /> <br /> 2~d- The new installation should be~a Pittsburgh Des Metrics Ste~l 0ompany incinerato~ <br />of fifty tons cap~ity in eight hours. The cost of this installation including modifications <br />of the Buildimg and supervision will be $2?,500.00. <br /> <br /> 3rd- The Pittsburg~ DesNo~ues-Steel OompS~y~.~s~the low bidder a~d they ~nish a satis- <br />factory type of-~cinerater. <br /> <br /> $+.dm- In case the 0ouuo~l Seems it best to construct a new incinerator on a new site,'X <br />would also recommend' the Pittsburgh Des Notnes Typ$. of farnaoe which, including new building <br />and supervision, But exclusive of site, will cost Sq~,O00.O0. <br /> <br /> ~- 5th- It should be f~ankly real,zed and admitted.theft the Best. type of incin~ra~o~ mus~. <br />in some respects be objectionable. In the ~Lvst.cas~, rega~dlees o~type ?f ~nexn~ra~or,.~here <br />will always be m~ple&sant odors from the u~rne~gs~bage wnich hasoee~smano~mg mn <br />Swo or three days. There m~st necessarily be some smoke and' some soot a~i of. course there till <br />always be a slight odor of burnt material bath in the smoke and:i~ the slag or ref.~e %ake~ <br />out of the fu~e. In my opini~u, however, the Pittsburgh Des Moines type of .far~ac~ will <br />give as satisfactoryresults as~c~ube obtaine~frome~y ~ther type of <br />pointed out the Pittsburgh Des Moinesep~pauy is the low bidder-in the bid's as submitted, <br />whether we rebuild t~e present plant or b~zild an entirely new plant ~n a new site.# <br /> <br /> 0~ motion, the commas,to,rich was referred to the Fi~ce Oommittee. <br /> ~.~d. ! respectfully recommend that ! be authorized, to.acquire three~lo$~ on the east <br />sict~ofDes Moines Avenue ~orth of LincolmSt,, for combined OommunityHall a~dFire ~t~tion <br />for the Ninth Wsmd, at $250.00 each." <br /> On motion, the recommendation was referred to ~lna~oe Oommittee. <br /> <br />UNFiNISEED~JSINES$ <br /> <br /> The following ordinance, which had bee~m~e~ on first reading-~?~.h, was takea up <br />and read: <br /> An Ordinance 0losing that Portion of Romanesque Street Lying South of t~e OccuPy <br />Str~etRoad. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stewar~ (R.E.B,) moved that the ordinanceBeadopted. <br /> On motion, the.privilege of the floor was.granted.to Mr. Jerow, of the. Ame~icau 0il <br />who spoke in reference to their request that the portiom~of the s~eet lying south of Ooumty <br />street road be closed. <br />~ Then Mr. Brooks moved ~hat ~hs ordinauce be laid on the ta~Ieunt~l the n~xt regular meel~- <br />lng of the Council, iu order that the coUncil ~may be supplied with mere info=motion on-%he <br />subject. The motion by Mr. Brooks was adopted. ' <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br /> Mr. Brooks offered the followi~gresolution,.whichm~asadopted: <br /> <br /> · ~E IT P~E~OLVED ~Y THE OOUNOIL OF THE 0IT¥ OF PORTSMOUTH, VA., That the 0ity of Portsmouth <br />~oin with the Oity of Roanoke and o+.her Oities of the State in couducting am info~mal investi- <br /> <br />g~tlon of the l~rOposed increase <br /> <br />in rates by The0hesaPeake &Potomac Telephone 0o? <br /> <br />On motion,~a~ned. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.