Laserfiche WebLink
November 9, 1926 <br /> <br />the recommendations of the Directors of the Portsmouth Chamber of 0oramerce, adopted at its re- <br />cent meeting. <br /> <br /> The Directors went on record as opposing any and all carnivals on the grounds that <br />they are detrimental, to the best interests of this community in every respect. <br /> <br /> In addition, the Directors of the Portsmouth 0h~mber of Commerce petition your honor- <br />able body to enforce this carnival license tax ordinance at all times to the fullest extent <br />and not to lift the tax on special occasions as it may be requested of you to do. <br /> <br />Respectfully yours, <br /> <br />George H. Gless, Jr., Executive Secretary." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. White, the privilege Of the <br />in favor of the petition of the Chambers Fire Co. <br /> <br />L. Bennett, President. <br />floor was granted to O. <br /> <br />N. M~rkham, who spoke <br /> <br /> Mr. Stewart moved that the m~tter be laid on the table until the next regular meetim~ of <br />the CounoiI. The motion was adopted. <br /> <br /> The regular report~ of the Oity Treasttver, Oity Collector, aud City Auditor for the month <br />of October, 1926, were presented and were referred to the Finance Oommittee. <br /> <br /> The City Auditor reported that the appropriation made in the Budget for gasoline and oils <br />has been ex~-~sted, and that it will be necessary to have an $1SO0.O0 appropriation for the <br />balance of tne~fiscal <br /> On moti~n.o~Mr;;Nay~,~th~appropriation~w~s referred to Finance Committee. <br /> <br />NEW BUS I~ESS <br /> <br /> Mr. White moved that the office of Justice of the Peace for Monroe Ward be declared vacant, <br />on accoUnt of the present Justice having moved out of the Oity. <br /> Dr. Dunford moved that action on ssme be deferred umtil the next regular meeting of <br />the Council· The motion by Dr. Dunford was mdopted. <br /> of~lm~r E. Pugh <br /> I~ this connection, an ~ppli~i~:~r ap~0tntment as Juatice of the Peace in Nonroe Ward <br />was read. Mr. White moved that ~he a~licatien be laid on the table until the next meeting <br />of the'Council. The motion was adopted. <br /> <br />The following communication was read from Portsmouth Post No. 3~, American Legion: <br /> <br />His- Honor, The Mayor, <br />Portsmouth, Virginia. <br /> <br />"Portsmouth, Va., November 3, 1926. <br /> <br />My dear Sir:- <br /> It is requested that an'apRropriate proclamationbe issued fro~ your office <br />declaring Armistice Day, ll November, 1926, a holiday for city offices and others concerned· <br /> <br /> The imoortance of this great anniversary grows as .it recedes into the past, <br />and the memor~ of the ~ay is one which should be kept alive in our hearts and minds by appro- <br />priate ceremonies. <br /> <br />Very respectfully, <br /> <br />Her~ry O. Davis, Colonel U.S. N~ine Corps, <br />Commander American Legion, Post Number 37, <br />Portsmouth, Virginia., <br /> <br /> Mr. Mayo moved that the request that the Mayor issue a proclamation declaring ArTistioe <br />Day a holiday, be concurred in. The motion was adopted, s~nd by the following vetS. <br /> <br />Ayes-- Brooks, Dunford, Naboth, Mayo, Cast, Stewart, White, 7. <br /> <br /> A petition was read from certain real estate owners living on and owning property on Queen <br />street, between Crawford and ~ashington, to h~ve sai~ street covered over the present cobble- <br />stones, with a smooth surface pavement; and on motion of Mr. White, same w~s referred to the <br />City ~ansger. <br /> <br /> A petition was read from certai~ citizens and taxpayers on Glasgow street, between 0curt <br />and Orawford streets, to have said street paved or smooth-surfaced, at and when the said City <br />~ves or smooth, surfaces Glasgow St. between 0curt and Washingtom streets, and on motion of <br /> · Ms,pin, the petitlonwas referred to the City ~anager. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brooks presented the following resolution: <br /> #Whereas, a prelimi~ary survey has been <br />made by, and a public hearing has been held before the United States District Engineer stationed <br />at Norfolk, Virginia, 'In the Matter of the Improvement of $ootts Oreck, Portsmouth, (Norfolk <br />Oounty), Virginia,' and <br /> <br />Whereas, the said District Engineer h~s reported adversely to said improvement; and <br /> <br /> Whereas, the Council of the City of Portsmouth deems t~e said improvement to be of vittel <br />~est to the said City and its inhabitants, and the inhabitants in the vicinity of the <br />~N~folk Harbor, and the said project has been approved by representatives of the Portsmouth <br />Ohamber of Commerce, the Retail Merchants Assooia~iom, the Rotary 01uP, t~e Kiwanis Olub, and <br /> <br /> <br />