Laserfiche WebLink
10, 1~2~ <br /> <br /> 5th. "I am enclosing herewith application of Mr. H. L. Alexander to erect a tw~ story <br />brick garage on his property at the south-east corner of Court St. and the Seaboard Air' Line <br />Railroad. Letter from the Bailding Inspector ~tating that' it ~ill not be necessary for Mr. <br />Alexander to secure the consent of the propert~ oWners as' th&-majority of the buildings already <br />erected within a radius of two hundred feet are business buildings. <br /> <br /> I recommend that the permit be granted." <br /> 'On motion of Nr. Oast, the recommendation of the Manager was concurred in. <br /> 6th. "I am submitting herewith an ordinance Drepared by the 0ity Attorney prescribing <br />fees to be paid for the inspection of electrical a~d plumbing work. Since there are mamerous <br />people doing this work from out of town places who are not paying taxes to the City, I think <br />they should pay fees for the servioe rendered_by the inspectors-.. Those who p~y the license <br />Tax are exempted from paying the fees." <br /> An Ordinance Providing for the payment of Fees for the Inspection of Work by the Plumbing <br />'inspector and the Electrical InspecTor. <br /> .On motion c~ M~. V~hite, the ordinance was placed on first reading. ~ _~ <br /> <br /> ?th. The Manager presented a report of lots sold. in Olive Branch Cemetery for the month of <br /> April, 1~27, but stated that i~ is not necessary to make a report of .lots sold in said Cemetery, <br /> and asked permission to withdraw.the same. <br /> On motion qf Mr. Oast, the M~nager was allowed to withdraw same. <br /> Sth. "Attached hereto, is a request from Mr. Ohas. L. Gain for permission to use building <br /> at 933 High St. for The purpose o~ conducting a .dry cleaning and dyeing establishment and <br /> accordimg to ordinance, it is necessary for the Council to approve the site. The piping for. <br /> the underground work is to be dsne under the supervision of the Fire Inspector, said location <br /> being within the business district. <br /> <br /> I respectfully ~ecommend that the 0ouncil approve this site for the purpose above <br /> indicated. ~ <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Oast, the recommendation of the Manager. w~s concurred in. <br /> <br /> ~th. ,! respectfully testiest permission to withdraw my recommendation asking your body <br />to approve a certain plan of pay deduction insurance. Though my idea was purely for the wel- <br />fare and good of the members cf the Police and Fire Departments, it seems to have been entirely <br />msiunderstood' by them. ! therefore think it inadvie~.ble to put the plan into effect at this <br />time. Should the members of these departments as a group, at any time, request their respective <br />chiefs to take this mt~er up with me, I wiz± be clad to go into it further.~ <br /> <br /> On motion <br />quested. <br /> <br />Maupin, <br /> <br />the M_~nager was allowed to withdraw his <br /> UNFINISHED BUS INE$$ <br /> <br />recommendation, as re- <br /> <br /> The following ordinance, which had been placed on first reading by 0°Uncil April 26~h, <br />taken up and read: <br /> An Ordinance Regulating the Sale of 0ommodlties and Ice by Weights and <br />Measures, and Prescribing the Neth~ds grid Use Thereof. ~ <br /> <br />was <br /> <br /> On mo~ion of Mr. <br />meeting of 0ouncil. <br /> <br />Mayo, the ordinance was continued on the table until the next regular <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />~lar reports of the Oity Treasurer, Oimy Collector, and City Auditor .for the month <br /> were presented and were refe~re~ to the Finance Committee. <br /> <br />NE~ BUSINESS <br /> <br /> The following communication wasread from Samuel E. Forwood, attorney for <br />Oormpany, <br /> "Norfolk, Virginia, April <br />Honorable City Council, <br />Portsmouth, <br />VirEinia. <br /> <br />A. Burcha~rd <br /> <br />Gentlemen:- <br /> Off behalf of Wm. A. Burcka~d Company,~ In¢orporated~ we. hereby make application for. <br />a refand of iic~nse tax paidbythat company.~o your cltyduring 1~26; <br /> <br /> As you are awar~, the ~x bill passed by the Legislature in 1~26 provides that <br />contractors (including electrical ~omtraotors) whop aid a license tax in one cit~ in the State <br />of Virginia should not be ~equired to ~ay a ~ike tax in a~y other city where they s~mply do <br />work wiThouT maintaining a separate office. <br /> <br /> We understand that the tax paid by th~ above company to you was $101.50, and was <br />p~id ~ne 8, [~26. A simila~ ts~x paid by them in the Oity of Suffolk was refunded. <br /> <br />Will yo~ kindly take necessary action to have this money refunded? <br /> <br />Yours very ~ruly, <br /> <br /> SAMUEL E. FORWOOD." <br />On motion of Mr. Oast, the communication was referred to the Oit~ Attorney and Finance <br /> <br /> <br />