|
june 2~,~ 1927
<br />
<br /> On motion, the communication w~s ordered to be filed.
<br /> 2nd. "I herewith submit attached applications from. the Eittrell System for the erection
<br /> of five bill boards to be placed-in different sections of the-0ity, as shown on applications.
<br /> I have personally inspected the locations and recommend the permits be granted."
<br /> Dr. Dunford moved that the recommendation of the Manager be concurred in.
<br /> M~. Stewart moved that the matter be laid on the table until the next regular meeting
<br /> of the Oounoil and referred to the 0ity Attorney for his opinion.
<br /> The motion by Mr. Stewart was adopted.
<br />
<br /> UNFINISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> The following ordinance, which had been placed on first reading by 0oun¢il June l~th, w~s
<br /> taken up and read:
<br /> AN ORDINANOE TO AMEND THE ORDINANOE ADOPTED BY THE 00UNOIL OF THE 0ITY OF
<br />PORTSMOUTH NAY 2~th, 1927, ENTITLED, "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE pAYMENT OF FEES FOR THE
<br />.INSPEOTION OF WORK BY TEE PLUMBING INSPEUTOR AND THE ELECTRIOAL INSPEOTOR," BY AMENDING AND
<br /> RE-ENACTING SECTION 2, SUB-SECTION (A) THEREOF.
<br />
<br /> On motion, the privilege of the floor was granted to Hr. W. Jennings Crocker, attorney
<br /> r the Master plumbers Association, who spoke in favor of. the amendment.
<br />~ Hr. Mayo moved that the ordinance 'be amended by~iding the following to Section 2, sub-
<br />~section-(A): #Boilers: For each steam or hot water boiler used~in connection ~i%~_a. heattng
<br />system, $5.00 .~ch ho~ water or steam radiate= imstalled $2.00. For each ox! ~urner
<br /> Used in connection w~th a heating system, $15, OO." - -
<br />
<br /> The amendment was adopted.
<br />
<br /> Then Hr. Stewart moved to adopt the ordinance as ~mended. The motion was adopted, and
<br />by the following vote:
<br /> Ayes-- Brooks, Dunford, M~upin, Mayo, Stewart, ~hite, $.
<br />
<br /> The following ordinance, which h~d been placed on first reading by 0ouncil June lSth, was
<br />taken up and read:
<br /> An Ordinance to Amend and Re-ordain an Ordinance Entitled-"An Ordinance Pro-
<br />hibiting the Erection of pertain Classes of Buildings or the Alter~tions of ~xisting Buildings
<br />for C6rtain Uses on any. Smte which has Not Been Approved by the Oity Council,-of the 0ity of
<br />Portsmouth; Prescribing Methods of Issuing Permits for Such Erection or Alteration and Imposing
<br />Penalties for Violations Thereof" Adopted by the 0ouncil of the 0ity of Portsmouth on the 27th
<br />Day of July, 1925.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Ur. White, the ordinance was ordered %o.lay on the table.
<br />
<br /> The following ordinance placed on first reading by 0eunoil June l~th, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br /> An Ordinance prohibiting the Erection of Certain Classes of Buildings the Alteration
<br />of Existing Buildiz~s for ~ertain Uses on any Site which has Not by the Oity
<br />Oounci± of the City of Portsmouth; Prescribing Methods of Issuing such Erection
<br />or Alteration and Imposing penalties for Violating-The=eof.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. White, the ordinance was laid en the table.
<br />
<br /> The following ordimanoe placed on first reading by Council June l~th, was taken up and
<br />read:
<br /> AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE EP~OTION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF BUILDINGS OR THE ALTERATI~IN'
<br />OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. FOR CERTAIN USES ON ANY SITE WHIOH HAS ~T BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY NANE~
<br />GEE CE THE OITY ~U~Ot ~ '0~TY ~NAGER ~BE~P~BLISHED~ AND
<br />PRESORIBING~METHODS OF_APPEAL3 TO THE~'GITY. OOUNCIL, i~GR' THE VIOLATION HEREOF.
<br />
<br />On motion of Hr. Mayo, the privilege of the. floor was granted tc any o~e interested in
<br />the ordinance.
<br /> Mr. Jno. W. Hopper, attorney, spoke in opposition t~ a~y ch~ge from ~ue present ordinance.
<br /> Hr. Maupin moved to substitute ~ fo±lowing for ~eCtinn 2: "All applications for the
<br />ere~otien or alteration c f such structures shall be first submitted tea Board composed of the
<br />0ity N~nager, Building Inspector, and Oily Attorney, who shall make such investigation and hear
<br />such evidence as they may deem necessary concerning such applic~tioms, and who shall return
<br />such sq0plications together with their recommendation and findings thereon to the City CoUncil."
<br /> Hr. M~upin ~ithdrew the substitute.
<br /> Then Hr. Naupin moved that the third sentence of Section 2 be a~ended to read as follows:
<br />"Any person who may be aggrieved by the approval of said site may file objection thereto in
<br />writing with the City Manager and in the event that such objectio~ is filed within eight d&ys
<br />from first d~te of publication, no permit sh~ll be issued until such site has been approved
<br />by the City Council." The amendment was adopted.
<br /> On motion of Hr. Maupin, the ordinance was adopted, as amended, ~nd by the following vote
<br />
<br />Ayes-~ Dunford, Maupin, Mayo, Stewart, White, 5-
<br />Nays-~ Brooks, 1.
<br />
<br />On motion, &~journed.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|