Laserfiche WebLink
November l, 1927 <br /> <br />September, <br /> <br />TRAFFIC: <br />~e-~th of September 1927, sJU~o for August 1927 and September 1926. <br /> <br />The following tabulation shows the passengez ahd vehicular traffic for <br /> <br />September 1927 <br /> <br />~ehicular Revenue <br />Passenger Revenue <br /> <br />August 1927 <br /> <br />$ 5,215.5R <br /> <br />'of the year, compared with <br /> <br /> Vehicular Revenue <br /> Passenger Revenue <br /> <br />25,853.45 <br />$75,700.6 <br /> <br />_September 1~26 <br /> <br />The following tal~u~ationshows ~he accumulated receipts since thefirs~ <br /> the same months last yeam: <br /> <br />jan. 1-sept. 3o <br /> $362, o51. Si <br /> <br />Jan. !-Sept. ~0 <br /> $321, ~8, 06 <br /> <br />Increase <br /> <br /> It will be noted that there is a decrease in the receipts for the month <br />of September of a lltmle over $5,000.00. This is almos~ entirely due to the decrease in the <br />vehicula~ traffic, which is to be expected for this month of the year. However, it will be <br />~oted that the month of September this year is about $5,OQO. OO over the s~me month last yea~. <br /> <br />FERRY SERVIOE Ferr~ service during the month was fairly satisfactory. The same schedule <br />has been'm~intained d%tring the month of September with the exception of from twelve to one <br />o'clock in t~e morning, when only one boat has run instead of two as heretofore. <br /> <br /> The Berkley bridge broke dow~ on October lOt~. ~e were notified of this <br />fac% at ~:15 in the afternoon and at ~:~5 we'had a bo~t on between Norfolk and Berk±ey. It is <br />ciaimed that this bridge will ~e out of commission for a month and a half or two months. Of <br />course while this boat is run it is a very good paying proposition. On the other hand, this will <br />effect ou~ service on the m~in line inasmuch aswe will have no more than f~ar boats at amy.one <br />time to operate on this line. Inasmuch as in ~he past it has been necessary to use five boats <br />on Sundays, we can now only use four and, of course, service Will nO~ be as satisfactory as it <br />h~s been. <br /> <br />NAINTENANCE The usual maintenance w~s carried o~ during the month of September. The <br />items worthy of men,ion are as follows: Ooncrete floor was pum in the c~ul bin. The middle <br />driveway of the Portsmouth Terminal was covered with a paving material known as Kyrock. This <br />was done by the C~y Engineering Depa~tmen~ under an agreement. This improvemenm has a tendency <br />to speed mp traffic and ~liminate a great deal of noise, and is certainly a greater comfort <br />to the ~raveling public. It is my intention to do the same to the other slips. There has!been <br />installed 'in the Norfolk and Portsmouth Termimals and on the ste~mer 'Golumbi&~ a modern light~ <br />lng system instead of the old ceiling reflectors that were used. The Terminals and boats have <br />always been poorly illuminated and this is an impr?vement worthy of the expense. The csurpenters <br />have been employed d-o~ring ~e mQnt~ mostly on repazring the fences and docks. <br /> <br />PE~ONNEL <br /> <br />During the month there has been no change in the personnel. <br /> <br /> On October 21st, at 9:06 A.M. the steamer ,Reckmway~ in making her l~nding <br />on the Norfolk.~!de collide~ with the steamer 'Oolumbi&~ t~ying in the dock. The guard of the <br />,Oolumbia~ came in Cont&ct with the wing deck of the 'Rockaway' and broke in the housing, do_lng <br />a damage of about two or three hundred dollars. There were two men and one woman slightly <br />~ured to the extent of scratches a~d bruises. The expense of this has bee~ taken care of by <br /> he Insurance Oompany and same hms been reported to them. Upon investigation I find that the <br />cause of the accident was unavoidable, it was a case of misjudging the wind and tide. <br /> <br />Attac~ed hereto is the report of ~ederick B. Hill and Company, Auditors. <br /> <br />Reepecti~lly submitted, <br /> <br />NORFOLK COUNTY FERRIES, <br /> <br />0has. U. F~eund, <br /> <br />Superinten~dent." <br /> <br />Onmotion, the report was ordered to be filed. <br /> <br /> Report w~s received from F~ederick B. Hill & 0o., of the audit of the <br />of the Norfolk Oounty Ferries for the month of September, 1927. <br /> On motion, the report wa~ ordered to be filed. <br /> <br />books and accounts <br /> <br />Dr. B~ook~ called Mr. ~nite to the Chair, and presented the following statement: <br /> <br /> #I~ our investigation last Tues. Oct. 25;of the Ferry si~tion it was very apparent that <br />some self, appointed political leaders, interested on±y in the furtherance of their-~n s~Jlfish <br />aims and intent upon discrediting th~ present administration, even unto the point of s~orificing <br />the greatest asset of the Oity was responsible for' the affidavits which brought ~oout the <br />investigation by the joint meeting of the Norfolk County Supervisors and the Oomn¢il of the <br />City of Portsmouth. <br /> <br /> Some of those who had previously been discharged from the Ferry Service were prevailed <br />&%pon to make affidavi~s against the ma~mgement and some of those who were still~employed by the <br />Ferry were either ~hreatened or promised, that if they signed charges against the Ferry Officials <br />they would get better jobs'and receive more pay. I want to here, now and in this manner de- <br />nounce any citizen or group of citizens, who, to vent their spleen or in an effort %o fur~er <br /> <br /> <br />