Laserfiche WebLink
June 14th. 19~2. - <br /> <br />the Givil Gourt has-so much work that she should not be able to have time to issue an exe- <br />cution which can take only-five or ten minutes, at the most, of her' time. <br /> In my opinion she wishes to act contrary to the desires of the ~blic or in <br />other words wants to have her own way about' conducting that office And in view of the fact <br />that she is a public servant it must therefore claes her in a position to be publicly criti- <br />cized without any resentment on her part. Miss-Johnson, the present 01erk, resented my ac- <br />tion several months ago when the matter was refered to ~udge Guthriell. <br /> If my case was the only one in which this occurred, of course, it would then be <br />a personal matter, but there are others vitally, interested in the same respect and I res- <br />pectiully ask that you take some action in .this. matter so that when executions or Abstracts <br />of judgments o~ other, papers are requested ~hat we will not have to wait from three days to <br />a week to get it. <br /> I will ~hAnk you kindly fo~ your. advice. ,i <br /> and on. motion of Mr. ~gg~ was referred to the C~ty Manager for investigation and repo~t. The following letter from the Colony Theatre was read: <br /> ,Eindly be advised that the above theatre paid $351.OO city license for the com- <br /> ing year. At that time the theatre was charging an admission of twenty five cents. To be <br /> exact we charged the twenty five cent admission for exactly fifteen days and found that it <br /> was impossible for us to charge the twenty, five cent price. At this writing we can definitely <br /> .... ~-~o~-~ ~,~ ~ the entire vear ~t fifteen cents. Inasmuch as <br /> the oi~y ~ .................. *- ~ · - - '-" ~"~ ~ returned to ~he <br /> the city $351.OO we would certa~ly appreomate the ~oun~ ove~ama <br /> above theatre. <br /> May we further state at this w=it~g that all other Sheatres in this city paid <br /> but the $201.OO.~ <br /> Tt~A~:ing you for yo~ co~teous attention to the a~ve matter, ~ are." <br /> <br /> and on motion ~s referred to the City Attorney. <br /> <br /> The following letter was read: <br /> <br /> "I hereby re,uest that your body relieve me o.f one-half the $5,000:00 assess- <br />m. ent placed a~ainst the b~ildin~s at the rear of 314--22 King Stree. t; half of said property <br />(that known a~ the Rialto Theatre) hs~ving been destroyed by fire ~n the summer of 1931. <br /> Respectfully submitted for your action. <br /> Mary ~V. H~tton. <br /> Nay I s sk if I am not entitled to a refund for 1931 taxes paid on this pro- <br />perty, As the fire occurred on April 3Oth, or Nay 1st, 1931, and it would seem that I should <br />have been relieved from this assessment for the last six months of the year 1931." <br /> <br />and on motion of Mr. Ogg was referred to the City Attorney. <br /> <br /> ~ Order of Oourt relieving Robert B. Albertson of tax on lots 39, 40, 41 & ~2, <br />Block A, Elm Ave., of $4.yy for year 1931 And $4.y? for year 1932, was, on motion of Mr. 0gg, <br />referred to the Oity Attorney. <br /> <br /> Order of Oourt relieving Port Norfolk Docks Oorporation of tax on land on Bay <br />View Boulevard as follows - $344.50 for year 193I and $344.50 for year 1932, was on motion of <br />Mr. Ogg, referred to the Oity Attorney. <br /> <br />On motion adjourned. <br /> <br />CITY CLERK. <br /> <br /> <br />