Laserfiche WebLink
167 <br /> <br />Be~te~be~ llth, 1~. <br /> <br /> Vote being takem on Mr. Stewart's motion, same was lost <br />vote~ .- <br /> <br /> Ayes: Brooks, Hutchins, Stewart - ~. <br /> Nays: Fox, Moore, Oas~, Parrish - <br /> <br /> On motion adJouraed. <br /> <br />Approved - <br /> <br />President. <br /> <br />and by the followimg <br /> <br />PortSmouth, Va., September 25th, 1934. <br /> <br /> At a reguI~r meeting of the City Council held September 25th, 1934, at 8:00 <br />P.M., there Were present: <br /> <br /> Vernon A. B~ooks, Leslie T. Fox, W.R. Hutchins, B.B. Moore, J. Alden Oast, <br /> H.F. ~arrish, J.R. Stewart, the Oity Manager. <br /> <br /> Minut'es of regulsm meeting held September llth were read and ap~uroved. <br /> <br /> The following communications from the City Manager were read: <br /> 1st - "The Oity of Portsmouth has received a d~ed from the United States, under <br /> date of September llth, 193~, for all of the property which the United States owned in connec- <br /> tion with the Water Works System. This deed will be sent to the Nansemond County Olerk's Of - <br /> lice, in the next few d'ays, for recordation. <br /> At the time the Oity of Norfolk purchased from the City of Portsmouth the <br /> Water Works System, located in Berkley and Sonth Norfotk,'there was h61d in escrow, deposited <br /> in the several banks in the City of Portsmouth, the sum of $25,000.00. This amount was to be <br /> held until the City of Portsmouth acquired title from the United States of America for the wa- <br /> ter meters attached to the Berkley and South Norfolk system. Since tha~ time the State Bank of <br /> Portsmouth has failed, and t~e sum of $4,166.67 was released to the City of Portsmouth and the <br /> remaining sum of $20,~).33 ms now held in the follewing banks of Portsmouth, as follows: <br /> <br /> American National Bank $ 12,500.00 <br /> Merchants & Farmers Bank 4,I66.66 <br /> Citizens Trust Company 4,166.6y <br />I have t~ken this matter up with Mr. T.P. Thompson, the City Manager ~ Norfolk, and have re- <br /> quested him to have the City Council of Norfolk release the money which is held in escrow. <br /> In the deed which the City of Portsmouth gave to the, 0ity ef Norfolk, it <br />was agreed that the above money was to be r~leased as soon as title to the 1~1 water meters <br />was conveyed to the City of Norfolk. The City of Portsmouth is now in a position tc convey <br />title to the meters and I recommemd that the City Attorney prepare a confirmation deed, and <br />that the proper officers of the City Council be authorized to sig~ the deed conveying title <br />to the me,ers to the City of Nor~l k. I am informed that as soo~ as this deed is received <br />thatthe City of Norfolk will release the money in escrow." <br /> <br /> The followimg resolution was offered by N~. Stewart and duly seconded: <br /> <br /> ~Be it resolved that the recommendations set forth in the foregoing letter of <br />the City Manager, be adopted and that the Oity Attorney be instructed to prepare and deliver <br />a deed to the City of Norfolk conveying title to the 165t meters and their settings mentioned <br />in said letter, amd that the proper officers of the City be authorized to execute the same,, <br />and the same-was adopted, by the following vote~ <br /> <br /> Ayes: Brooks, Fox, Hutchins, Moore, Oast, Parrish, Stewart. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> <br />titled: 2nd - "t submi~ herewith au ordinance, the adoption of which is recommended, eh- <br /> <br /> <br />