Laserfiche WebLink
August 13th, !gMs. <br /> <br /> The. item of $92,692.27, as of Dec. 31st, included $20,000.00 received from the Virginia Elec- <br /> <br /> t325,656.05 and disbursements were $3~4,732.20, leaving a cash deficit for the year, of <br /> $19,07~.15; ' <br /> ~e s.um of $2S,718.53, paid to the Federal Government in <br />be eliminated in 1935. ~s~z~at~ng the cash balance at the end of 1935, by using <br />utes, deducting ~he $19,0y6.15 deficit from the $28~18.53 h~retofore oaid the Government, <br />indicates a cash balance at the end of 1935~ of $9,6~2.~7~. <br /> <br /> OPERATING RESULTS FOR 1935 <br /> (By Superintendent Davis) <br /> ~The estimated Water Department earnings over estimated expense for <br />the year amounts to ~Oout $3E,OO0.00 which is -only a reasonable ar~uuaXsurolus, having in mind <br />that the revenue may not meet expectations,that there are units in the wa~er works system <br />forty-seven years old, which may, an~ probably will require replacement or extensive reoairs, <br />and tb~t additional mains required each year should be paid for out of current revenue.~ <br /> <br /> NATION.~L BOAJ~ OF FIRE ~NDERWRITERS. <br /> <br />contains these comments: Reoort No. 269 of the National Board of Fire Underwriters, July,1935, <br /> <br />$1000.00 per year, <br />earnings. <br /> <br /> "Cbns!derable sections are supplied by 2'incho. ipes <br /> and lack adequate fire pro~ection." ~Hydrant spacing <br /> is wide." <br /> ~Fire flow tests made in Ma~ch, 1935, with 65 pounds <br /> station pressure and the stand oipe closed, but other - <br /> wise under normal ooerating conditions, indicate that <br /> quantities (of water) available in the principal mercan- <br /> tile district are inadequate." <br /> <br /> 1934 BOND ISSUE, <br /> Amortization of the $25,000;00 bond issue of !93~ will require <br />beginning in 1938 end continuing for twenty-five years, to be paid from <br /> <br /> SINKING FUND <br /> <br /> In order to make the l0 ~ reduction in water rates, which reduction <br />became effective in 1933~ snnual payments to the' Sinking Fund were reduced from $~6,000.00 to <br />$33,500°00. At the same time, the Manager, s report to the Council stated:: <br /> <br /> "These reductions will reduce the income of the Water <br /> Department approximately $34,000.00 per year. This will <br /> absorb all of the present surplus of the Water Department <br /> and the recommended reductions in payments to the Sinking <br /> Fund. The annual payments of ~27,351.00, plus 5% interest <br /> to the United States Government, for property purchased <br /> several years ago~ will be completed nex~ year (1934) <br /> which will' make this amount available after 1934, for im- <br /> provements to the property or in any way desired.~ <br /> <br /> In this connection, on July 21st, 1933, Thompson, Wood & Hoffman, <br />New York Bond Attorneys, advised the City Manager, that they could not recommend an annus~ <br />payment of less than $33,500.00, assuming that the F~nd would continue to earn ~% pe~ annum. <br />They again pointed out that a large portion of the Sinking Fund~-was represented by cash held <br />in local b~uks, and desired to know the amount paid by the banks on such deoosit's, ~hich In- <br />formation was desired to enable them to arrive at the correct earning Dower'of the Sinking <br />Fu~d. ~ <br /> <br /> On July 2hth, 1933, the Manager advised the Attorneys that if the <br />e~,rnings of the Fund went below 4%, payments would be immediately increased, to take care of <br />the deficiency. <br /> On July 27th, 1933, the Attorneys advised the City Msnager that an - <br />nual payments of $33,500.00 would ~e sufficient for the present at least. The Attorneys s!so <br />advised that, if in the future~ the interest received on the SinkingFund is actually tess <br />than 3 3/4%, it wo~ld, be necessary to revise the amount paid into the Sinking Fund, and t_h~t <br />if the increase from the ~ater Department sho~d not be sufficient to make the Sinking Fund <br />requirements, then the Water Bonds would i~mediately become chargeable against ~he Bonded In- <br />debte~,ess of the City. <br /> Reference is made, at some length, to the Sinking Fmud, because this <br />is an important item, in considering the question of reducing the earnings of the Water De - <br />partment. <br /> REDUCTION IN P~TES. <br /> <br />If the reduction to <br />suit will be a loss <br /> <br /> There are 6,540 consumers now paying at the rate of $2.70 per quarter. <br />$~.50 is made,.and if consumers keep w~$h!n the proposed minimum, the re <br />in revenue of $5,232.00 per annum, distributed as follows: <br /> <br /> In Portsmouth $ 3,596.00 <br /> In Norfolk County 510.00 <br /> In Suffolk _l_~l 126o00 $ 5,232.00 <br /> <br /> <br />