Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Uarch l~th. 19=39. <br /> <br />ficient in the matter of recreational centers, the Kiwanis Club of Portsmouth, Va., in session <br />Ma~ch 8, 1939, voted unanimously to petition the City Council, asking the Honorable Body to <br />concur in the purchase of the eighty acre tract of lsnd in question. <br /> This land could be tamed into a recreational center, where the multitude of <br />those, now deprived of outdoor recreation, through laek of facilities, could enjoy the same <br />advantages provided by practically every city in Virginia. <br /> We feel that, with the purchase of this eighty acre tract, a great step would <br />be taken to relieve the serious condition, the City tf Portsmouth is now facing, in the build- <br />ing up of the health~f both young and old. <br /> The~iwanis Club heartily endorses this movement. <br /> <br /> Respectfully yours, <br /> <br />Kiwanis Cl~o of Portsmouth, Va. <br /> <br /> E.~. Heely, Secretary." <br /> <br /> The following petition was read, aud on motion,- laid on table: <br /> <br /> "Our community is woefully lacking in public parks, recreational centers for <br />adults s_nd playgrounds for children. <br /> Comparison with other cities of like p~p~lation throughout the country places <br />Portsmouth low down in the list~ and reflects little credit ~pon her past activity in this <br />respect. ~ <br /> <br /> Although Portsmouth is one of the older cities of the country, yet no appar- <br />ent effort was made to acquire such facilities until within the past few years, consequently <br />it has only ~ne small combination park and cemetery, somewhat inaccessible and one playground <br />situated neam the business district. <br /> Norfolk is,well provided with such attractions, consequently Portsmouth's <br /> lack of them, obviously, places her at a decided disadvantage in the eyes of new residents <br />when appraising the advantages of the community, with the view of ~locating their homes. <br /> The time is ripe and ~he opportunity is presented whereby the City may now <br />make a constructive and much needed advance, in acquiring an available tract of eighty acres, <br />admirably located and excellently adaptable to park and recreational purposes. This tract <br />contains a golf course of approximately forty acres, constructed some years since at consider- <br />able ecst. <br /> H~der a W.P.A. project, the remaining forty acres may be economically develop- <br />ed into a park, with am ample playground for children. Within this site there is an inlet <br />from Western Branch, which at some future time may be dredged, providing an excellent basin <br />for a~chorage of small motor boats. <br /> We refer to that tract of land, a part of Glensheallah, lying between the At- <br />lantic Coast Line Railroad tracks and the residential section cf Glensheallah, and between <br />Glasgow St., on tJae south and the Beaten ~arm on the north. <br /> We, the undersigned citizens, respectfully petition your Honorable Body to <br />empower and direct the proper authority to negotiate for the purchase of this land for the <br />purpose cf establishing a public park and recreational center thereon. <br /> <br />Signed - J. Jac Bangel and 125 others.. <br /> <br />The following letter was read and ordered filed: <br /> <br /> "The Portsmouth Ministerial Union, in its regular monthly session today, <br />voiced its appreciation for your recent action in placing on its first reading, an ordinance <br />banning the sale of wine Andbeer in our Oity, from midnight each Saturday to six A.M. each <br />Monday. ' <br /> It is their hope that ~his ~rdinance will be adopted at your meeting on <br />March 14th. <br /> <br />Yours sincerely, <br /> <br />(Signed) Robert Lee House, Sec., <br /> PortsmoUth Ministerial Union." <br /> <br /> The following letter was read, and referred to the City Manager: <br /> <br /> "At the meeting of the Portsmouth Central Labor Union, of March 3rd, 1939, <br />there was several complaints presented in regar~ls to the unconvenience caused by thestray <br />dogs of the City, and also of the county. <br /> I have been instrmeted to write th~ Honorable City Council, amd see if there <br />could be some correction to this public nuisance . <br /> Reports were made from ~est Park View of severat~cases where home owl~ers <br />have tried to beautify their yards with shrubbery and flowers, only to have them killed down <br />by the roaming dogs, which are always paying them visits. In many cases the dogs have no tags <br />on them, and again, some of them may have tags on them which is more valuable than the dog may <br />be. <br /> Reports bar, been made fro~ different sections of the City; from Garden <br />and from individuals, claiming that they have tried to get this trouble corrected, but to no <br />avail. <br /> Protests have been made in regards the stray cats of the city also, but the <br />complaint was no~ as strong against the cat as it was against the dog. But any lover of wil~ <br />life knows how destructive the ca~ is, not to mention the nights you are kept awake by their <br />courting parties under your hou~ or near your window. I have read some news paper talk about <br />ou~ fight on the cats, and ! would ~uggest that the writer of such articles should subscribe <br /> <br /> <br />