such fee shall be ten dollars; if the entire gross amoun~ of
<br /> such business exceeds twelve thousand dollars, such fee shall
<br /> be ten dollars plus one dollar per thousand for all such busi
<br /> ness in excess of twelve thousaud_ dollars; provided, however,
<br /> that such fee s.hall not exceed forty dollars in any case.~
<br /> This law (state) can be found in Section $ of the State laws pertaining to
<br />Cleaning and Pressing bnsiness~ approved April l, 193~.
<br />
<br />Signed - S.M, Brooks, 2517 Detroit St.
<br /> and others."
<br />
<br />The following ordinance, laid on table at last meeting, was taken up
<br />
<br /> 'lAN ORDINA~CE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SIXTY
<br />THOUSA/ID DOLLARS OF BONDS OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA,-
<br />TO BE KNOWN AS IMPROVEMENT BONDS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ERECTING
<br />PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTUP~JES, THE PU.W3~HASE OF LAND, AND THE
<br />INPROVEMENT OF STI~T~ETS AND PUBLIC PLACES; NAKiNG PROVISION FOR
<br />THE FOPJ~ OF SAID BONDS AND FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF.,
<br />
<br />On motion of Nm.
<br />
<br />N
<br />
<br />and read:
<br />
<br /> Howard, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Fox, Grimes, Howard, Hutchins, Warren, weiseman, Wilson
<br />None
<br />
<br />- NE~ BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> Bill of J. Shirley Hope, State Game Warden, for destroying 90 tagless dogs,
<br />at $2.50 each, amounting to $225.00, was presented, and on motion of Mr. Hutehins, the Treas-
<br />urer was authorized to pay same from funds in her hands, from collection of Dog Taxes.
<br />
<br />The following letter was read:
<br />
<br /> "The following observations and suggestions in connection with the Ferries
<br /> are respectfully advanced in the hope that they will be of value, and will be deemed worthy
<br /> of favorableconsideration by both the City and County.
<br /> First impressions of visitors to the City by way of the Ferries must neces-
<br /> sarily be decidedly unfavorable since the unsightly environments are directly in their line
<br /> of vision. Traffic entering the City by way of the Ferries is met by and routed along unat-
<br /> tractive surroundings fo~ approximately two blocks away from High Street - its objective -
<br /> only to come back, practically to the point of beginning, kY way of another street.
<br /> Traffic entering the City, destined for the Ferries by way of High Street,
<br /> is, upon approaching to within a block of its objective, abruptly routed, by the aid of an
<br /> electric sign, directly away from it; that is North onOrawford Street, to the end of which
<br /> it is apt to proceed in apnrpose to comply with this directing signal; ~here being nothing
<br /> at London Street to guide them.
<br /> When finally proper direction is learned this trsSfic uses city streets,
<br /> sometimes three of them, as parking.space while waiting for the boats
<br /> The fares charged, h~th for pedestrians and vehioles~ are unreasonably high.
<br /> Before automobiles came into use, the fare was three cents for pedestrians, and later, two
<br /> and one half cents.
<br /> It is my information, and as well my view, ~hat the Ferry service was not
<br /> inaugurated for purposes of profit, or as an investment, but instead for convenience as a
<br /> business expediency. I was told by a citizen, who was a member of the Board of Ferry Commis-
<br /> sioners, as far back as 1870, that it was always his view that the Ferries should be maintah-
<br /> ed for the convenience of the public, not for profit; and that the fare should be no more
<br /> than enough to maintain them in good condit ion, something like one cent per pedestrian.
<br /> The delays suffered in making the trip - a constant menace to business - are
<br /> unreasonable and unneaessaryo
<br /> The int.erests of the present Joint owners - the City of Portsmouth and the
<br /> County of Norfolk are, and will always be, divergent. Portsmouth's efforts should be directed
<br /> toward civic developmen~ The County's course is, and Portsmouth's seems also to be, directed
<br /> toward monetary gat~.
<br /> Portsmouth c~ntributes parking space on its streets for all vehicular traffic
<br /> at no expense ~ the Count~; receives no taxes from the County for its one half ownership in
<br /> the Ferry properties located in the City; and sustains the Ferries, through patronage of its
<br /> people, to an exten~ not even remotely approached by anv other entity; whereas the county,
<br />_ sharing equally in all benefits and profits, makes negligible contribution in this request.
<br /> I suggest that the County dispose of its interest in the Ferries to either
<br /> Portsmouth or Norfolk, 8nd that the then owners:
<br /> Acquire the property opposite the Ferries on the west side of ~ater St.,
<br /> through to Crawford mst., beginning at the southern boundsa~y of the brick building on.the south-
<br /> west corner of Water and Queen Sts., and running south to the brick hotel building on the cot -
<br /> net of High and Water Sts.; and provide tJaereon five-or six traffic lanes from Water St., to
<br /> Crawford St., using ~hese and the existing l~nd at C~awford St., adjoining the property on ~he
<br /> S. outh, for the parking and routing in and out of Ferry vehicular traffic;
<br /> Secure legislative action amending the Charter so as~to make possible the dis-
<br /> continuance of the ~ortsmouth-Berkley service, on the grounds that the highway from points in
<br /> the County to the County seat in Portsmouth, provided by this Portsmouth-Berkley Ferry Service,
<br /> is now satisfactorily provided by the toll-free bridge connecting the Portsmouth side with the
<br /> Norfolk side;
<br /> Dispose of all Ferry properties in Berkley as promptly as possible, without
<br /> unduly sacrificing them;
<br />
<br />
<br />
|