Laserfiche WebLink
such fee shall be ten dollars; if the entire gross amoun~ of <br /> such business exceeds twelve thousand dollars, such fee shall <br /> be ten dollars plus one dollar per thousand for all such busi <br /> ness in excess of twelve thousaud_ dollars; provided, however, <br /> that such fee s.hall not exceed forty dollars in any case.~ <br /> This law (state) can be found in Section $ of the State laws pertaining to <br />Cleaning and Pressing bnsiness~ approved April l, 193~. <br /> <br />Signed - S.M, Brooks, 2517 Detroit St. <br /> and others." <br /> <br />The following ordinance, laid on table at last meeting, was taken up <br /> <br /> 'lAN ORDINA~CE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SIXTY <br />THOUSA/ID DOLLARS OF BONDS OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA,- <br />TO BE KNOWN AS IMPROVEMENT BONDS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ERECTING <br />PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTUP~JES, THE PU.W3~HASE OF LAND, AND THE <br />INPROVEMENT OF STI~T~ETS AND PUBLIC PLACES; NAKiNG PROVISION FOR <br />THE FOPJ~ OF SAID BONDS AND FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF., <br /> <br />On motion of Nm. <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />and read: <br /> <br /> Howard, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote: <br /> <br />Fox, Grimes, Howard, Hutchins, Warren, weiseman, Wilson <br />None <br /> <br />- NE~ BUSINESS <br /> <br /> Bill of J. Shirley Hope, State Game Warden, for destroying 90 tagless dogs, <br />at $2.50 each, amounting to $225.00, was presented, and on motion of Mr. Hutehins, the Treas- <br />urer was authorized to pay same from funds in her hands, from collection of Dog Taxes. <br /> <br />The following letter was read: <br /> <br /> "The following observations and suggestions in connection with the Ferries <br /> are respectfully advanced in the hope that they will be of value, and will be deemed worthy <br /> of favorableconsideration by both the City and County. <br /> First impressions of visitors to the City by way of the Ferries must neces- <br /> sarily be decidedly unfavorable since the unsightly environments are directly in their line <br /> of vision. Traffic entering the City by way of the Ferries is met by and routed along unat- <br /> tractive surroundings fo~ approximately two blocks away from High Street - its objective - <br /> only to come back, practically to the point of beginning, kY way of another street. <br /> Traffic entering the City, destined for the Ferries by way of High Street, <br /> is, upon approaching to within a block of its objective, abruptly routed, by the aid of an <br /> electric sign, directly away from it; that is North onOrawford Street, to the end of which <br /> it is apt to proceed in apnrpose to comply with this directing signal; ~here being nothing <br /> at London Street to guide them. <br /> When finally proper direction is learned this trsSfic uses city streets, <br /> sometimes three of them, as parking.space while waiting for the boats <br /> The fares charged, h~th for pedestrians and vehioles~ are unreasonably high. <br /> Before automobiles came into use, the fare was three cents for pedestrians, and later, two <br /> and one half cents. <br /> It is my information, and as well my view, ~hat the Ferry service was not <br /> inaugurated for purposes of profit, or as an investment, but instead for convenience as a <br /> business expediency. I was told by a citizen, who was a member of the Board of Ferry Commis- <br /> sioners, as far back as 1870, that it was always his view that the Ferries should be maintah- <br /> ed for the convenience of the public, not for profit; and that the fare should be no more <br /> than enough to maintain them in good condit ion, something like one cent per pedestrian. <br /> The delays suffered in making the trip - a constant menace to business - are <br /> unreasonable and unneaessaryo <br /> The int.erests of the present Joint owners - the City of Portsmouth and the <br /> County of Norfolk are, and will always be, divergent. Portsmouth's efforts should be directed <br /> toward civic developmen~ The County's course is, and Portsmouth's seems also to be, directed <br /> toward monetary gat~. <br /> Portsmouth c~ntributes parking space on its streets for all vehicular traffic <br /> at no expense ~ the Count~; receives no taxes from the County for its one half ownership in <br /> the Ferry properties located in the City; and sustains the Ferries, through patronage of its <br /> people, to an exten~ not even remotely approached by anv other entity; whereas the county, <br />_ sharing equally in all benefits and profits, makes negligible contribution in this request. <br /> I suggest that the County dispose of its interest in the Ferries to either <br /> Portsmouth or Norfolk, 8nd that the then owners: <br /> Acquire the property opposite the Ferries on the west side of ~ater St., <br /> through to Crawford mst., beginning at the southern boundsa~y of the brick building on.the south- <br /> west corner of Water and Queen Sts., and running south to the brick hotel building on the cot - <br /> net of High and Water Sts.; and provide tJaereon five-or six traffic lanes from Water St., to <br /> Crawford St., using ~hese and the existing l~nd at C~awford St., adjoining the property on ~he <br /> S. outh, for the parking and routing in and out of Ferry vehicular traffic; <br /> Secure legislative action amending the Charter so as~to make possible the dis- <br /> continuance of the ~ortsmouth-Berkley service, on the grounds that the highway from points in <br /> the County to the County seat in Portsmouth, provided by this Portsmouth-Berkley Ferry Service, <br /> is now satisfactorily provided by the toll-free bridge connecting the Portsmouth side with the <br /> Norfolk side; <br /> Dispose of all Ferry properties in Berkley as promptly as possible, without <br /> unduly sacrificing them; <br /> <br /> <br />