Laserfiche WebLink
November 8~th. 1941. <br /> <br /> · ~ . Notion of Er. Lawrence.to~approvesaid contract and that the proper officers <br />be authorized to execute same, was adopted, and by the following vote: <br /> <br /> A · <br /> yes. Fox, Grimes, Hall, Hutchins, Lawrence, ~arren, Wilson <br /> Nays: Howard~ <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />following resolutiOn, Iaid on table at~ last meeting, was taken up and <br /> <br /> nWHEREA~, a letter from Rea~ Admiral Felix X. Gygax~ in <br /> following words, was submitted to the City Council at its <br /> meeting on October 14th, 1941, To wit: <br /> <br /> 'The Yard is considering the advisability of <br />installing a subaqueouswater connection with the City <br />of Norfolk in order ~o guard against-the possibility <br />of sabotage to the Portsmouth water system, If this <br />were done, the Yard would continue to purchase all of <br />its water from the City of Portsmouth except in case <br />of breakdowns~ ~hen the valve to the Norfolk supply <br />would be open. It would not, therefore, be smatter of <br />competition between the 0ity of Portsmouth and the <br />City of Norfolk as to furnishing water for the Navy <br />Yard, but purely a matter of emergency supply. <br /> I have taken this matter up with the City of <br />Norfolk ~nd have been informed that Section 3065 B of <br />the State Code prohibits the Oity o f No~folk from sell- <br />ing water on the Portsmouth side of the Elizabeth River <br />without the approval of theCouncil of the City of <br />Portsmouth having been first obtained. It is, there - <br />fore, requested that this matter be presented to the <br />Council for its formal approval., <br /> <br />read: <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the <br />City of PortSmouth that it gives its consen~ to the lay- <br />ing of the said pipe and the use of water from the Nor - <br />folk water system in case of emergency only, and only at <br />such time as the City of Portsmouth is unable to supply <br />water to the United States Nerfo!k Navy Yard by reason <br />of breakdown to the Portsmouth water system. <br /> <br />~n.mo$1on of~N~j:Howard.~s~d resolution-was adopted, and by the <br />f~llo~ing~.~ote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Fox~ Grimes, Hall, Howard, <br /> Warren, Wilson <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Hutohins~ Lawrence, <br /> <br /> The following communication from the City Attorney was read: <br /> <br /> "I respectfully report on the fo!lowlmg tax matters w~dch were referred <br /> tO me. <br /> First: Petition of the Woman's 01ub for rebate of taxes for the pot - <br />tion of the year 1~4i on property at the corner of Middle and London Sts., assessed in the n~e <br />of Harry M. Cohen. The Woman's Club expects to rent the second floor of the building and use <br />the first floor for its purposes. The Commissioner of Revenue intends to reduce the assessment <br />for 19~2 from $9,000.00 to$3,000oOO, a reduction of two-thirds. The property was bought by the <br />Woman's Club under deed dated July 9th, 1941 and recorded on July llth, 194!. The property was <br />rented until abo~t Augus~ 1st, 1941, and if the Council desires to give a refund, as has been <br />done in church m~tters, the Woman, s O!ub should be relieved in the amount of $65.40. <br /> Second: The letter of Mr~ A. E. Parker, City Collector, concerning tax <br />assessments assessed against Ers. Jennie Hs~ris, on personal property as follows: <br /> 193 ....... $1.5o <br /> <br /> 19~O 1.88 <br /> This was a double assessment, the personal oroperty also having been as- <br />sessed to her son MoRo Harris for the same years and should be relieved in her name. <br /> ~ . <br /> hird~ The recommendation of Frank Faulkner to be refunded the amount <br />paid for a fish license. The City Council has never refunded any money where the person has <br />decided n~ to c~n~inue, i~ business. The license are transferable and could be sold to another. <br />person, z~ woul~ ce a oa~ precedent of affair to start a refund in such case · <br />apply to automobiles and there would be no means of ke~oing check in such cas~s~s it would also <br /> Fourth: The followin real estate as ament= <br />Stallings on lot 288 house 19~5 Elm Ave. should bt r~lieved: <br /> <br /> 1935 ....... 5 .33 let " 194o - 25.62 <br /> 193~ 5~.33 2nd " , _ _ 25.62 <br /> 2nd " ~ - 25.62 <br /> let half l 3S <br /> 2nd " - - 25.~2 <br /> <br />This property was sold under deed dated August 29th, 1924 by the widow <br /> <br /> <br />