Laserfiche WebLink
~EAS, ,du~ing the pa.st six yea~s, the U.S.O. has rendered <br />u~selfzsh sn~ capable serw_ce to the members of our armed forces <br />for which the City of Portsmouth is most grateful to that organi- <br />sation, its perso:emel and advisory board, and <br /> ~,~HEREAS, it seems that at the ter~ination of this ~ea~ or <br />sooner the U.S.0. v~ill cease its activities locally and t~e <br />building will be available for the City to purchase for its use <br />and the City b~lieving the project to be too costly to administer <br />with its present budget and fins~ces without working a hs. rdship <br />or increasing taxation, smd <br /> VfHEREAS, the City, under Federal law, enjoys first priority <br />for purchase and the City of Portsmouth does not ca~e to exercise <br />its right hereby waives its right in order that the Federal <br />Agency may d~_spose of it to the best ~uterest of the Government <br />as incorporated inthe Lanham Act adopted by the Congress of the <br />~ited States of .~nerica, <br /> NO~, THE~ORE,_ BE IT RESOI~'ED that the Council of the City <br />of Portm~outh, Virginia advise tho Federal Works Agency of the City's <br />desire to waive its rights s~nd benefits in order that the <br />building at the cox~ner of South and Crawford Streets may be dis <br />posed of to the b~st interest of the United Stat~s Geverm~nent. <br /> ~E IT ~0R~ RESOI~ED that the City Co~uci! request the <br />Federal i~orks Agency to sell the said property to the .~zmerican <br />~egion if negotiations for s~m.~ ca~u be tez~uinated agreeably by the <br />Legion and the Federal ~¥orks Agency upon the condition that the <br />possession of the property be not given until the U.S.0. ceases <br />its operation at the end.of December, !94V." <br /> <br />resolution of the <br /> <br /> On motion <br />City Ms~ager were <br /> <br /> Ayes <br /> Nays <br /> <br />of Mr. Law, once, the request in ~r. Hill's letter <br />adopted ~ud by the following vote: <br /> <br /> Henderson, ~oward, Lawrence, Stu~tev~nt, Waz~en, <br /> Weiseman, Wilson <br /> ~one <br /> <br />s~d the <br /> <br /> ~n motion of Er. Hows~d, the privilege of the floor was granted a <br />delegation from the Kings Daughters Hospital, ~o presented the following: <br /> <br /> ~Wne [~ngs Daughters Hospital of Portsmouth, Virginia, is now ex- <br />periencing considerable difficulty in meeting its finaneisl obligations on~ccount of the ser- <br />vice it is rendering to those who a~e f~uanciallyunable to pay and are necessarily classified <br />as charity patientso <br /> The cha~ter of the Hospital provides that ~the purpose of the hospi- <br />tal is to provide medical aid and nursing to the sick, and disabled~ and i~ came of the poo~ <br />without a charge as far a s the means of the association will permit.~' <br /> It has been the oolicy.of the Hospitsd to carry out the purposes for <br />w~eh it was established and a g~eat amoun~ o f charity work has been per,or, ed. <br /> ~=e cha~itywork of the hospital has been divided into two classes, <br />namely: City Cha~ityand Hosoital C~s~ity. Cases falling under the category of City Chamity <br />are those patients who are a~mitted t~oughthe emergency room of the hospital and a large per <br />centage of these are brought there by the Police Department of this City. <br /> For the year 19~ the smount of City Charlty,~ases on ward rates, was <br />$15,592.65; for t~e yea~ 19~5 the amount of City Chs_~ity; based on ward rates, was $20,631o90 <br />and for the yea~ 1945 ~he amount of City Ct~a~i~y was $32,337.02. The Hospital has received the <br />sum of $15,000.O0 each year from the City of Portsmouth, f or the three years entm~erated. The <br />total amotuut of City charity-for the past three years was $69,561,~7. ~ne total amount receiv~ <br />from the City for the past three years for services rendered was ~5,000.00, thereby creating <br />a less of $2~,56i.5~ for the past three years. <br /> The smount of hospital charity for the past three years was $8V,018.~ <br />No part of tl~is expense is borne by the City of Portsmouth.~ <br /> The E~recto~s of the Hospital feel that the loss sustained f rom pa - <br />tients admitted on the certificate of the City Physicia~, an agent of the City should be borne <br />by the City smd are therefore requesting that the City Council appropriate the s~m~ of $2~,561.~ <br />for the benefit of the Hospital, which amount is justly due ~d~owing to it by the City. <br /> <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> <br /> Gaston S. Foote, President, <br /> The Kings Daughters Hospital." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Lawrence to place on its first reading an~opropriation <br />of $24,561.57 for said put'pose, was adopted. <br /> <br /> On motion of ~r. Sturtevant, the privilege of the floor was g~amted <br /> ~? ~ in Ports- <br /> stated that the ~i~uager refused him a permit to establish an industry <br /> <br />Mr. Harris, who <br />mouth. <br /> <br /> The following com~unicatio~ from the City Manager were read: <br /> <br /> 1st - "~'ith reference to my Item #7, presented to you at the regular <br />meeting of the Council on Ja~ua~y.28th and referred back t o me for investigation, I would like <br />to submit the attached letter from the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, for reeor~t? <br /> ine!osu~e <br /> ~is is in reply to you~ letter of Janus~y 30th,194~ in corn~ection <br /> with ou~ future policy and costs regarding the ~rnishing of telephone service to citizens of <br /> Pomtsmouth. <br /> <br /> <br />