|
Ninth Ave., King St., and Sixth Ave., be rezoned on
<br />the proposed new Zoning map ~or light industrial use.
<br /> This recommendation w as adbpted b~' the Pl~uning Corn
<br />mission at a meeting held i~o~ember 6tln, 1947.
<br /> · G.C. Roberts, Chairman,
<br /> Planning and Zoning Co~_mission.
<br />
<br /> B. ~The Planning and Zoning Co~m.~ission record%ends that the relieving
<br />changes be made on tlae proposed new Zonir~ Ordinance:
<br />
<br /> 1. North and West Truxton land be rezoned from light indus-
<br /> trial to residential.
<br /> ~. At the north%~est cQrner of Elm Ave. and Fayette St., 100
<br /> feet by .100 feet be rezoned from Coma. ercial to Residential.
<br /> 5. That Elm Avenua on both sides 100 feet south of Leckie to
<br /> Ar~u Street be re~oned from Co~.~'-~ercial to Residential.
<br /> 4. That Detroit St. on both sides west of ~t. Vem~non to the
<br /> alley between Florida and Douglas Avenue be rezoned from
<br /> C ormaercial t o Residential.
<br /> ~. Bo~tk sides of F~fin~ham St. from Henry St., north to 100
<br /> feet south of Randolph St. frmm light Industris[[ to Resi-
<br /> dent ial
<br /> 8. 5~%e two blocks bounded by Lin'coin, Green, Chestnut and Henry
<br /> Sts. to be r~ezoned from li~.=ht I~dustrial to Residential.
<br /> These reco~mu, endati~o~-s were adopted by the Pla~uning Co--lesion at
<br />meeting held October ~nd~ 194V.
<br /> G. C. Roberts~ Chairman,
<br /> Planning and Zoning Commissio.~. ~'
<br />
<br />which v{ere, on motion
<br />the following vote:
<br />
<br />of ~r. Barcla~ adopted.
<br />
<br />On motion of Hr. Barclay,
<br />
<br />the ordinance as ~mended, v~s adopted, and by
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br />Fox~ Ba~ela%r, Grimes, Henderson,
<br />~krren, Weiseman, Wilson
<br />None
<br />
<br />Howard,
<br />
<br />Sturtevant ~
<br />
<br />The Acting City ~anager presented the feZ!owing:
<br />
<br /> '~. _~.~_. Ha~vood, a member of the Hoard of Supervisors of Norfolk Co~at
<br />i~orms me that the County of Norfolk desires to sllow the fire-fighting equipment and ambu -
<br />lance remain ~in the Grove Park Fire Station dnt£1 such time as the County is able to erect a
<br />new fire house. He thinks a new buil~ding can be erected ~$ithin ninety days. The County has
<br />no place to house the eq~ ipment sad ~ believe it is to the ~_~t~al advantage of the City cud
<br />the Co~saty to keep the equipment in service.
<br /> ~.~. Bl~ywood and I have reached an a~eement, which is attached and
<br />~ich ! request you to approve smd authorize me to sign on behalf of the City.~
<br />
<br /> l~lotion of ~fr. Sturtevant to oonc~ in the Acting City f~[anager~ s r ecom
<br />mendation, was adopted.
<br />
<br /> A_u appropriation of ~7~6.T9 for Annexation, laid on table at last
<br />meeting, was ts~en up.
<br />
<br /> Hotion of Mr. Weiseman to appropriate ~2,VS5,79 for said p~pose, was
<br />adopted, sm~ by the follow~ng vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Fox, Barclay, Grimes~ Henderson, Howamd,
<br /> Warren, Weisems~ Wilson
<br />ITa~: None
<br />
<br />Sturtevsnt,
<br />
<br />was adopted.
<br />
<br />~iotion of ~gr. Weiseman to confir~ the purci~ase of a clock for the sta-
<br />
<br />The following letter was referred to the A6ting City ~smager:
<br />
<br /> ~On October i4th, 1947, page 2V9 of the Co.mci! mind. res, Stem ~6, Z
<br />reported to the Council a letter from the Chief Engineer of ~e Pennsylvania Railroad, rela-
<br />tive to the ~esley St. crossing. RoW. Grigg, S~t. of the Railroad, has sent me the following
<br />t~tter~ which Z must a0mit is correct:
<br />
<br /> ~Repiying to your !etter:0f Dec,bet !7th, 1947, with regard to easement on Wesley St., etc.:
<br /> It is our ~mdersta~di~g that our 0hief Engineer, ~.L.P.
<br /> Struble, ~ote you on October 9th, 194V amd gave you cer-
<br /> tain conditions under which the Pennsylv~ia Railroad would
<br /> allow the City of Portsmouth to have am_ easement over o~
<br /> tracks s~ud property at Wesley St. and that you infozmaed
<br /> him-on October 14th, 1947, that you would bring these mat-
<br /> ters to the attention of the Cotuacil and request authority
<br /> to negotiate s~ agreement in regard to the crossing~ etc.
<br /> We have been ir._for~ed that ~f~. Struble has b~d no f~ther
<br /> word fr~ you since your letter of October 14th~ !947.~
<br />Will you please arram~e to draw up so~.~ fo?m of agreement that would kc
<br />
<br />
<br />
|