|
squad whose ~ties shall entail the measurement of all improvements and the computation of
<br />their square footage or the cubical oont.ent; complete recordation ovf ~he physical chamacteris~
<br />tics of each separate property, showing zn addition not only the physical depreciation of the
<br />structure, but obsolesence factors involved as well; classification of all residential and
<br />commercial structures and the tent.ative appraised value of each; the scientific appraisal of
<br />all lots and acreage tracts according to t he ~omers System ~nich takes into due consideration
<br />the depth, corner influence and alley factors.~
<br />
<br />opra~sers (4) ~ ~375. mo,for lB mo. .................... $15,000.
<br />Travel allowance $ ?0. mo.for 12 mo. ....... (2 cars) .... 840.
<br />Cle. zcal Ass~sts~uce to Assessors & Appraisers ............ 1,800.
<br />Supplies- (Appraisal sheets, post binders,tapes, etc.) 200.
<br />Local Assessors (3) $15o per day ea. for 30 days 1,350o
<br />
<br /> $19,190.
<br />
<br />Total cost of general reassessment
<br />
<br /> It should be noticed that the average daily rate for allVirgznza' '
<br />localities was quoted for your assessors merely for purposes of an estimate. Under this pro.
<br />general supervision is by th~ Board of Assessors and usually a separate office is established
<br />for their use. It has been customary for the assessors to review the work periodically as it
<br />is being done. Under this system each individual locality has be~ able to procure the very
<br />highest type of person as an assessor° This has been due pr~nar~ly t o assistance rendered
<br />in the time-cons~ming and laborious part of his task in the field° In usually one day, the
<br />Board of Assessors can review the appraisals acc'mmulated through a two-weeks period.
<br />
<br />YoUrs very truly,
<br />
<br />adopted.
<br />
<br />Motion of }Ar.
<br />
<br />HOward that
<br />
<br /> Fred C. Forberg.a
<br />
<br />the 1950 assessment be made as heretofore,
<br />
<br />~as
<br />
<br /> An appropriation of $750.00 for curbs, g~atters and sidewalks in
<br />of King Street, laid on table at last meeting, was taken up.
<br />
<br /> ~o~ion of Mr. Houghton to appropriate $V50.00 for said purpose,
<br />and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />the 4~00
<br />was adopted,
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />
<br />Nays;
<br />
<br />Fox, Bilisoly, Duke, Grimes, Henderson, Houghton, Howard~,
<br />StU~tevsmt, ¥~'arren, Weiseman, ~ilson
<br />None
<br />
<br /> Afl appropriation of ~3,500.00 for overcoats for firemen, laid on ~ able at
<br />the last meeting, was taken up.
<br />
<br /> Motzon of ~r. Houghton to appropriate $3,500.80 for said purpose, w as
<br />a.nd by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Fox, Bilisoly, Duke, Grimes, Eenderson, Houghton, Howgrd,
<br /> Sturtevant, ~rren, ~eiseman., Wilson
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> The following letter, laid on the table on September 13th, was, on motion of
<br />Mm. Weiseman, cen~mnued on the table:
<br />
<br /> "I sh~u~ld like to recommend that parking meters be placed on the west side
<br />Crawferd St., between igh and King Streets.
<br /> I i~rther recommend that parking be limited to one hou~ between the hours
<br />8:00 A.m. s~d 6:00 P,~t., on both sides of Crawford Street, from Co-mary to Columbia Street.''
<br />
<br /> The following letter, laid on the table on September 13th was, on motion,
<br />the ~r~SD!brtation ~emmittee:
<br />
<br /> ~'~e have at p~esent an ordinance prohibiting the Bus Oompany frc~ advertisin
<br />on the outside of their vehicles. This type of advertisement is permitted in other place~and
<br />there is considerable revenue derived from it. For instmuoe, every other business compmny in
<br />the City including the Railway Express Agency and the United States mail trucks are permitted
<br />to ca~y outside advertisements and i suggest, for yo~u~ consideration, that you a~end the
<br />ordinance and permit this type of advertising on our local buses.~
<br />
<br />the table:
<br />
<br />The following ordinance, laid on the table on September 13th was continuedon
<br />
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />'~AN ORDINANCE TO AI~D AND RE~0RDAIN A~ 0RDi~ANCE A~F~NDING THE
<br />LICENSE TAX oRDINANCE ADOPTED BY T~ CITY COUNCIL ON ~RCH 29th~
<br />1949, BY CHANGING SECTION 14 Ace
<br />
<br />The following ordinance, laid on table at last meeting, was taken up:
<br />
<br />'~AN ORDINANCE TO A~END SECTION T~ENTY-SIX OF THE LICENSE TAX 0RDI~ANCE"
<br />On motion of N~. ~eiseman, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following
<br />
<br /> Ayes: FOX, Biiisoly, Duke, G~ules, Henderson, Houghton, Howard,
<br /> t~rtevan~, ~[arren~ Weiseman, ~ilson
<br /> Nays': None
<br />
<br />
<br />
|