Laserfiche WebLink
November !4th, 1950 <br /> <br /> For the calendar year 1949~ such cars in Roanoke were operated at a cost <br /> of 3.9 cents per mile and in Albemarle at 4.2 cents~ and in prior years exoerience shows com- <br /> parable costs. The Compensation Board is constrained to recommend for yo{~r consideration <br /> the adoption by your co~uty of the plan which has been so successful in Roanoke and .~&bemarle <br /> connties for a number of years. <br /> Under this plan the cars ~re purchased by the county~ and are purchased <br />at a much lower pice than is a~vailable to the sheriff o.r a deputy purchasing a car individual] <br />The difference in cost is in the neighborhood os' aooroxmmately $250. or ~300. per car. Most <br />of the Federal tax is saved'when the county purcha~.s the car. County owned cars are license <br />free and the tax paid on gasoline consumed t~rein~ ms refundable. Moreo~er by carrying fleet <br />insurance the county effects very substs~utmal~ · savings in the cost of insurance. The cars are <br />serviced by the county at much less cost than the sheriff is compelled to pay. <br /> Under this plan the State~ ~t the end of the year~ reimburses the county <br />for two thirds of the actual cost of +' ' · ~ <br /> opera.mort and mamnten~nce~ which actual cost includes <br />depreci~tion~ so that the county recovers fro~ the State t~o-~hmrds~ ' of the ormgmnal' ' cost of <br />each car over the period of the life of each c~. <br />.... Your attention i.s cal~led to the fact that the cost of m~leage has greatly <br />~ere~ase?_as~ .ShOWn o~ ~he fact that ~n 19~5 the cost was $134:897. and. by !~49 this cost mor~ <br /> a~ ~_ouolem ~o reach ~290~759. The cost in 1946 was $161 5 · in t 4 1 8 ~ ' <br />1948 $233,315. ' : 37 ~ 9 7 $ 7 ,~56. and mn <br /> The Compensation Board believes that if the plan in force in Ro~uoke and <br />Albemarle Counties could be put into effect in all of the counties and cities that actual <br />saving might well reach a figure as hiMh ~s $100~000. This plan covers not only sheriffs of <br />counties but also sergeants of cities. The CompensatiOn Board would be gtad to receive your <br />reaction to the above suggestions." <br /> <br />tions~ were read: <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Meiseman to refer to the City Manager was adopted. <br />The following two letters from R.M. Youell, Director: Division of <br /> <br />Correc- <br /> <br /> 1st - "The jail of the City of Portsmouth was inspected by this Division <br />on October 24th~ 1950. A reoort on this inspection is submitted herewith." <br /> <br />sion on October <br /> <br />2nd - "The lookup <br />19~O. A report on <br /> <br />On motion filed. <br /> <br />of the City of Portsmouth was inspected by this Divi- <br />this inspection is submitted herewith." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Weiseman that street lights be installed at the fo!lowir~ <br />intersections was adopted: <br /> <br />Pine and Mauoin Streets <br />Harper ~nd Pine Streets <br />Bart and Godwin Streets <br />RicP~ond and Clifford Sts. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith ~equested information regarding the benches which have been <br />placed in front of the Court House recently. <br /> <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Howard that the matter be referred to <br />On motion ad~o~rned~ <br /> <br />?re~/j~ - ~ <br /> <br />the City Manage~ was <br /> <br /> <br />