Laserfiche WebLink
February 27th, 1951 <br /> <br />At the regular meeting of the City Council held-on February 27th, 195t, there were <br /> <br />present: <br /> <br />Fred A. Duke, Frank N. Bilisely, Jr., George L. Grimes, Carl C. Houghton, Jr., <br />James N. Howard, R. Irvine Smith, E. Robie Sturtevant, C. E. Warren,°Pearle J. <br />Wilson, Ii G. Vass, City Manager, and R. C. Barclay, City Attorney. <br /> <br /> Minutes of the regular meeting of February 13th, 1951 and the called meeting of Feb- <br />ruary 2Oth, 1951 were read end approved. <br /> <br />The following reports from the City Manager were read: <br /> <br /> 1st - "The question of a request of the West Park View Garden Club for the City Coun- <br />cil to make a contribution towards the cost of constr~ction of the '5~ar Memorial Building" was referred to the <br />City Attorney and m~self for a report. The City Attorney advises me that under Section 32-134 of the Cede of <br />Virginia, the City can not legally appropriate money for this purpose." <br /> <br />On motion filed. <br /> <br /> 2nd - "I have been advised by Mr. R.E. Hawks of the firm of Welton, Duke and Hawks, <br />Incorporated, as follows: 'We wish to call your attention to the fact that the Seventy-Five Percent Co-Insurance <br />Clause is applicable to item No. 26 fire headquarters on Effingham and Nobth Streets. We are of the opinion that <br />it would cost considerably more to build this building today than it did when it was actually built and we wonder <br />whether the amount of insurance is sufficient to comply with the Seventy-Five Per Cent Co-Insurance Clause.' . ~ <br /> In my opinion, a survey and appraisal should be made of all City-owned building~ <br />to ascertain if a sufficient amount of insurance is being carried on Citybuildings." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Bilisolythat a survey of appraisals be made of all city-owned buildings <br />to ascertain if a sufficient amount of insurance is being carried on city buildings, was adopted. <br /> <br />adding the following: <br /> <br />3rd - "I recomend that the Budget for the year ending June 30th, 1951 be amended by <br /> <br /> Estimated miscellaneous income from permit to <br /> construct water and s~wer ditches ~n Middle St. $ 2,769.00 <br /> <br />Damage to Stadium Wall <br /> <br />130.00 <br /> <br />Damage to Cemetery fence <br /> <br />i also recommend that appropriations be made as follows: <br /> <br />Street Eclair Materials Function #403 <br />Item 319 --- Credit $ 2,769.00 <br />Repairs to Stadium 130.00 <br />Repairs to Cemetery Wall 160.00 <br /> $ 3,059.00." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Houghton to appropriate $3,059.00 for said purpose, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 4th - The City Manager stated that the City Cede had been submitted in galley-proof fo~ <br />&nd he wished to know if the Council preferred reviewing the Code before it was published. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Houghton that the preparation of the Code be referred to the City N~uager <br /> <br />was adopted. <br /> <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS - <br /> <br />The following ordinance placed on its first reading at the last meeting was taken up and <br /> <br />read: <br /> <br />"AN OBDINANCE TO AMEND AND RE-OHDAIN EXHIBIT 'A' ATTACHED TO AND MADE <br />A PART THEREOF, AN CRDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF <br />PORTSMOUTH ON JUEY 28, 1926, ENTITLED ' AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE MOTOR <br />BUS PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION IN THE CITY OFPORTSEOUTH' AND THE ~/~E~D- <br />EENTS THEREOF." <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Grimes, said ordinance was adopted and by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Duke, Grimes, Bilisely, Houghton, Howard, Smith, Sturtevamt, <br /> Warren, Wilson <br />None <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />The following letter from the City Attorney was read: <br /> <br /> "In reference to the attached petition of George Salas for the relief of taxes, I find <br />that there was no building on the land in question. A building permit was issued in 19~l but the building was not <br />constractedand the Assessors omitted the building when the re-assessment was made in1946. The following taxes, <br />with interest and penalties, charged ag$inst a building on lot 20 block 38 E.S. Airline Avenue, should be re - <br />lieved: 1942 in name of T.Y. Bennett, $25.00, 1943, 19~4, 1945 and 1946 in the name of George Salas, $25.00 for <br />each year." <br /> Attached - "I request that I be relieved of the taxes assessed against a building designated as <br />Airline Avenue, Portsmouth, Va., on 1St 20 in hloc~ 38 on the plat of Prentis Park. I was assessed for a buildin <br />on this lot in the amount of $1,0CO.00 for the years 1942 through 1946, both inclusive, but there was never any <br /> <br /> <br />