Laserfiche WebLink
300 <br /> <br /> . Motion of Mr. Weiseman to amend the ordinance by inserting the name of M~rtha Gills Lee <br /> <br />in place of T.B. Lee, was adopted. <br /> On motion of Mr. Weiseman, the ordinance as amended was adopted, aud by the following <br /> <br />vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Duke~ Bilisoly,Grimes, Houghton, Howard, Smith,SturtevaUt, Warren, <br /> l~eisemau, Wilson <br /> Nays: None <br /> The following ordinance, placed on its first readiug at the called meeting of September <br /> 5th, 1951, was taken up and read: <br /> ,AN CRDINANCE TO APPROVE THE SALE OF G~E M~.T.ION FIVE HUNDRED IHoUSAND <br /> DOLLARS OF SCHOOL BONDS PROVIDED FOR IN THE ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY <br /> COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~F PORTSMOUTH ON AUGUST l~th, 1951, AND FIXING THE <br /> RATE OF INTEREST FOR sAID BONDS" <br /> On motion of Mr. Howard, seconded by ~roSmith, the ordinance was adopted and by the <br /> <br />following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Nays'. <br /> <br />Duke,Bilisoly, Grimes, Houghton, HOWard, Smith, Sturtevant,Warren, <br /> Weise~u, Wilson <br />None <br /> <br /> The following letter from Robert F. Platte was read: <br /> <br /> "I would consider it the greatest privilege to be included among other artists submit- <br />e~quissee tin any future competition for the design and execution of ~any civic wall~coration or ~mral paint- <br />May I therefore respectfully submit m~ name to you for possible future consideration in this regard?" <br /> Motion og Mr. Weiseman to refer to the City ~nager was adopted. <br /> Motion of Mr.~ilson that the City Manager continue extra help for the Game Warden was <br /> <br />adopted. <br />was adopted: <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Houghton that the following petitions be referred to the City Manager, <br /> <br /> "l~e~ the undersigned of Wilson l~ard,Western Branch District, hereby respectfully pet~ <br />tion your body for the installation of street lamps for the protection and welfare of o~r conmmnity. <br /> The undersi~aed are residents of the 3~00 block of Lincoln Street, between Loudon and <br />Cumberland Avenues, and are sincerely iuterestedin the improvem~ut and advancement of our community. Upon <br />vestigation you will find Westhaven Park to be very poorly lighted. <br /> Inasmuch as in the particular area there are open drainage ditches (several ~nor ac- <br />cidents have already occurred) and that Loudon Avenue is a bus stop serving the residents of our block, we ask <br />that steps be taken to providenecessary lighting. <br /> Mr. and Mrs. W.E. ~ilcox - and others." <br /> "l. The resident property owners of the $600 block of High St., (l~esthaven) and those <br /> residd-ug at the intersections of High St. and Ameliaand Powhatau Avenues, whose signatures are affixed hereto, <br /> respectfully request that the indicated matter, relative to improving the street conditions of the aforemen - <br /> tioned block, be presanted before the City Council for consideration;and approval atthe nex~ regular meeting. <br /> (a) Provide more adequate street drainage on the north side of High St. at the <br /> intersection of Amelia and Powhatan ~venues. At present~ rainwater drainage collects in a dead-ended gully that <br /> extends the length of the ~00 block of Amelia Ave., opposite the intersection~ and remains there until absorbed <br /> by the earth. Culverts are installed at the intersection of PowhatanAvenue and High St., <br /> but they appear to be either of insufficient siZe or improperly placed to permit an unrestricted flow of water. <br /> During heavy rain falls the small ditches at these two intersections overflow, resulting in floo~ng the edges <br /> of the corner lots. This conditi~b)of'inadequate drainage causes considerable damage to the lawns and gardens. <br /> Hard surface (macadamize) the semi-graded street in the ~600blockof High <br /> Street, in width of about 20 feet, to eliminate the rut condition t~a~ prevails winter and s~n~er. This would <br /> be conducive to safer street travel for both the pedestrians and vehmcme operators. <br /> In the interes~ of pedestrians who are obliged to use this thoroughfare, <br /> hard-Surfacing the street wo~ld prove most useful and beneficial Luasmuch as sidewalks are not installed. <br /> As to vehicular traffic, improving the one street would afford better access <br /> not 01nly for fire trucks and emergency cars but would provide an additional alternate for public utility vehicles <br /> during their daily visits to this community. This is especially important during the winter season, since on <br /> several occasions, the street nearly developed into an unpassable condition because of deep and treacherous mud <br /> holes. Resident postal delivery service is not rendered to those living in the ~600 <br /> block of High St., because the present street condition does not conform ~_th requirements set forth in the U.S. <br /> -Post Office Manual of Instructions for Postal Personnel, 19~8. For establishing city delivery service, Chapter <br /> l0 of this manual states, ,,S~r~icemaybe established at any city ha~ing postal receipts of at least $10,OO0.-- <br /> etc., and a pot~zlation of 2500 or more residing within a territory possessing good continuous sidewalks, im- <br /> proved streets, house numbers, ~- etc. The territory must be 50 per cent impro~edwith houses." <br /> The lack of this postal delivery service imposes a comparatively hardship on <br /> those f~m~lies who, during inclement weather, must resort to a muddy thoroughfare to and from themail boxes lo- <br /> cated nearly a block away. 2. In respects tc the forthcoming sewage installation in the ~esthaven district, it <br /> appears that the subsequent costs of repairing this street for a distance of one block, if macad~ized, would ex- <br /> ceed but slightly the expense that will be involved in reconditioning the surfaces of tk~esent grade. The <br /> ~600 block of High St., as a matter of interest, is the only s~,~'-graded thoroughfare remaining north of King St. <br /> 3- It is believed this relatively-minor project could be accomplished without great <br /> exoense to the City of Portsmouth audwo~ld contribute considerably to the valuation of the adjoining property an~ <br /> <br /> <br />