|
Aoril 28th. 1959
<br />
<br />- . UNFINISHED >~BUS IArESS
<br />
<br />up and read:
<br />
<br />59=96 =. Tko.following ordinance, placed on first reading at lastmeeting, was t~ken
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND C~IAPTER 17 OF THE CODE OF TP~ECITY OF PORTSMOUTH,
<br /> VIRGINIA, 1951, BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION NI/~BEP~D SECTION 17-24.1, TO PROVIDE
<br /> A CURFEW FOR MINORS UNDER SEVENq~EN YEARS OF AGE BETWEEN TH~ HOURS OFll:00 P.M.
<br /> AND 5:00 A.M., AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF SAME" ~
<br /> The City ~anager stated that the age of minors mn the ordinance had been changed fro~
<br />sixteen years To seventeen years, and the City Attorney recommended that the ordinance be placed on fLrst read-
<br />ing.
<br /> Motion of Mr. Walker to place said ordinance, as amended, on first reading, was
<br />
<br />The-following ordinance,.placed on first reading atlast meeting,
<br />
<br />adopted, without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br /> 59-97 -
<br />
<br />up and read:
<br />
<br />'schedule of prices'
<br />
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />taken up and read:
<br />
<br />was taken
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO A~END AND,RE,ORDAIN_SECTIOnS 6-16 ARq) 6-19 OF THE CODE
<br /> OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1951, RELATING TO PRICES FOR LOTS
<br /> IN CITY CE}~TERIES ;~D TO CHARGES FOR OPENING GRAVES"
<br /> Motion of Mr. Bartlett to amend the ordinance by adding 'baby graves $20.00' in the
<br />was adopted, by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />Once.orion of Mr.
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br />59-98
<br />
<br />Bartlett, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br />
<br /> Ba~rtlett the ordinance, as amended, was adopted, and by the follow-
<br />
<br />Baker, Bartlett, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br />None
<br />
<br />The following ordinance, placed on first~r~ading at last~meeting, was
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE ENCROACE~ENT OF A BUILDING UPON THE EAST SIDE
<br />OF FOURTH AVENUE AT ITS INTERSECTION 1WITH HIGH STREET"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Weiseman, said ordinance was adopted, and by.the.following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br /> 59-105 -
<br />meeting, was taken up and read.:
<br />
<br />mendations were made:
<br />
<br />Baker, Bartlett, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br />Breedlove
<br />
<br />The.following communzcation from the Planning Director,
<br />
<br />deferred.to this
<br />
<br />"At the meeting of the Planning Commission on March l?th, 1959, the following recom .
<br />
<br />That the ten:foot alley on Hamilton. Ave. north of Franklin Circle,
<br />bounded by lots 15~ through 157 inclusive, he closed.
<br />Also, tha$ portion of Scott Street, wes~ of Powhatan Avenae approx-
<br />imately two h~ndredand sevent~ foot.in length be close~"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr.- Bartlett, the following ordinance was placed on first reading:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO CLOSE~ THAT PORTION OF SCOT~ STREET WI{ICH LIES WEST OF
<br />POWHATAN AVENtLE"
<br />
<br />Onmotion of Mr. Weiseman, tfme following o~dinance was placed on first reading:
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO CLOSE A TEN(10) FOOTALLE~ EXTENDING EASTWARDLY FROM
<br /> HAMILTON AVENUE, BETWEEN.HARTFORD STREET AND FRANKLIN CIRCLE"
<br />
<br /> 59-106 - The z~eq~aest of the Commissioner of Revenue for refund of $20.21 to Janet M.I
<br />A~drews,~ representing enro~eous assessment on an automobile, placed on first reading at last meeting, was
<br />taken up.
<br /> On. motio~ of.~ir. Bre~dlove, the refund was granted, without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br />- NEW BusINESS -
<br />
<br /> 59-11Z- Tt~e following communication from the Commissioner of Revenue was read:
<br />
<br /> "Please be _advised tha~ Harry E. and bL~rgie B. ~eis~ have been assessed for
<br />~le personal p~per~y valued fer-$670.00 ~i~.t~es ~ount~g to $i8.~3. Our~vestigation reveals ~at the
<br />corre~· ass~ss~nt should ~ve'been.$H70-00 with t~es ~o~ting ~o $15.68, ~presenting ~ over ~sses~ent
<br />tax~ ~o~m%ing ~'~ $2.75. The t~er h~ ~id. the origi~l t~otice, as evidenced by enclosed receipt.
<br />As this ~is definitely ~ over~en~ of $~.75, we.request t~t a mef~ in this~o~t ~ ~de ~o the t~xpayer.
<br /> 0n motion of ~r. Bartlett said refund~ was placed on first reading, without ~ssenting
<br />vote. (Mr. Weisem~ not voting).
<br />
<br />
<br />
|