Laserfiche WebLink
To reverter to the City upon ,the failure of the purchaser to construct on the <br />site within 60 days not less. than 1§,000 square feet of :floor ~space msable for <br />industrial purposes." <br /> <br />and by the ,fo~lowin~ vote: <br /> <br />Hotion of Mr, <br /> Nays': <br /> <br />Bartlett_ to noncur in .the recommendation o£ the City Manager~was.adopted <br /> <br />Baker, Bartlett, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman <br />None <br /> <br /> 59-150 - The rezoning o£certain proper~y, known as the old Jeffrey Wilson site, to <br />'J Heavy IndustrTal!, placed on first reading at: the meeting ,gl' June .2nd, was taken up and read: <br /> <br />"At a called meeting, May 20, 1959, .at 2:15 P.M., the Planning Commission acted on the <br /> <br />following' petition: <br /> <br /> The application of the City of Portsmouth.to rezone the property beginning <br /> at a point .on the south side of Portland Street (£orme~ly 8th St.) 232.7 ,ft. <br /> easterly from the southeast intersection al Mt.. Vernon Avert and- Portland St., <br /> thence N 860 E along man extension o~ the south side of Portland St., 62,3 ft. <br /> to the westarlY.~ide of Broa~ St., ~as extended by the Departmemt of Public <br /> Works of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia~ thence continuing ,southeasterly along <br /> the westerly side of Broad St.: as extended by the said Departmemt of Public <br /> Works, a distance of 623 feet, more or less, to a point on the easterly exten- <br /> sianof the north side ofJNorth Stt., thence,westerly along the said extension <br />· of the north side of 'North St. 239 ft., more or less, to a point, said point <br />being 225,2ft. easterly from 'the.northeast~ intersection of Mt. Mernon ~ve. and <br />North St~; thence N 1° 00' :W,, 64.8 ft. to ~ point; thence N 39° 15' W, 212.2 <br />ft. ~o a point; thence N 00° 14' W, 22 ft. to a point; ~hence N 9° 26' E,105~82 <br />ft. to a peint, thence N 20° 52' E, 260 ft., more 9r less, ~o the point of he- <br />ginning. Application to ~rezoae from B Single-FamilyDwelli~g District to J <br />Heavy Industrial District. <br /> <br /> The Planning Commission .recommends that ~hAs proper~E be offered for sale and he re- <br />zoned to J Heavy Industrial District, as requested in the appli&ation from the City of Portsmouth. If a sale <br />is not consummated at zhis time, then the property is to remain as presently zoned." <br /> <br />Motion of Mr, Bartlett that this be approved on second reading ~as adopted, without <br /> <br />dissenting vote. <br /> <br /> 5R-163 a "I submit the attached resolution prepared by. the City Attorney in reference <br />to the merger of the Norfolk and Western and Virginian Railroads.'~ <br /> <br />vote: <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Bartlett, the following resolution was adopted, without dissenting <br /> <br /> "]gHEREAS~ Nor£olk & ~es~ern Railway. Company and the Virginian Railway Company <br /> have filed their joint applications with the Insterstzte Commerce Commission <br /> for authority to merge the latter into the former; and <br /> WHEREAS, ~arge numbers of employees of the aforesaid railroads reside within <br />the City o~ Portsmouth, although there are a~ present no physical properties of <br />eithe9 o~ said r~iitraads within the presenz corporate limits, and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposed: merger will, in the opinion of thi~;Council, adversely <br />affect the continued operation of Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad <br />Company, which railroad is a vital link in the system of railroad ~ransporta - <br />tion~serving the City of Portsmouth and the harbor of HamPton Roads. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED by the Cbuncil of the City of Portsmouth, <br />Virginia, that the proposed merger of Norfolk and Western Railway Company and <br />The Virginian Railway Compan~ would be detrimental to the interests of the citi- <br />zens of this City and that this Council opposes and objects ~o tush merger. <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City C~erk is directed to forward a ce=tiffed <br />copy of these resolutions to the Interstate Commerce Commission and that the City <br />Attornqy is authorized and directed ~o take ~he necessary action to make the City <br />of Portsmouth a par~y ~o the pending proceedings and thereafter, by oral argNment <br />or written brief, state the position of the City of Portsmouth at the conclusion <br />of the proceedings." <br /> <br /> 59-164 - The following resolution was presented, and on motion of.Mr. Weiseman was <br />adopted with the Council standing, honoring the memory ofMr. Sturtevant: <br /> <br /> "WHEREAS, in His infinite wisdom, Almighty God has called unto Him E.Robie <br /> 8turte%ant, ~ho served as a member of this Council for twelve years, giving <br /> of his time and talents in conducting the affairs of this City and its <br /> citizens; and <br /> WHEREAS, in addition to his aforesaid tenure of office, E.Robie Sturtevant <br /> rendered great service ~o this City and his fellow citizens by active and <br /> faithful participation in numerous religious, civic and fraternal organiza- <br /> tions; and <br /> WHEREAS, the cormmunityhas suffered a great loss in .the passing of E. <br /> Robie Stu~tevant and has joined with his famit~.~ friends and associates in <br /> mourning his d eaCh'and in recognizing ~he worth of his accomplis~ents <br /> NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~rED.'by the Conncit of th$ City of Pertsmou-th, <br />Vimginia, that the sympathy of this body, acting for ~he citizens of this <br />~City, be and hereby ms exzended to the family-of~ the !ate E. kobie Stnrtev~ut. <br /> BE IT FURTHER ~ESOLVED that these resolutions be spread upon the minutes of <br /> the Council and that a copy thereof 1be forwarded by the City Clerk to the <br /> family of the deceased." <br /> <br /> <br />