Laserfiche WebLink
D~cember <br /> Zgth, <br /> 1959 <br /> <br />j '' t ' ' the- ha <br /> his past November 26th, <br /> nzghts up to 9 30 P.M., but still on an hourly bas~s only. y unnzng buses on Sundays and holzdays and at <br /> I somehow feel that this is but a temporary improvement to offset the POrtsmouth <br /> Transit Company's reqnes~ to operate buses in the' annexed area; 'Once they-are certain they have the backing of <br /> City Council and are positive the PTC will notbe permitted to'extend their present routes, I have aa doubt but <br /> that we will once again receive our previous 'unsatisfactory~ service. I am at a loss to understand the ex - <br /> Pression of sympathy for Mr. Barnes that has been attributed to several of you gentlemen. In past years, PTC <br /> took over part of Mr. Barnes' territory (because he was operating within city limits) and they ran buses into <br /> ~°~u~lo~c~e years ~rior ~o annexation of that community. If the financial w ...... <br /> - ~ =um~ *o ezm zor the acquisition of a part of his line as <br /> was done when the Tunnel Commission p~id N~rfolk Count~ for taking over the ferries~ and as the City of Ports- <br /> mouth is doing for the n~wly annexec portion of Norfolk County, <br /> <br /> · People in our ~eam~dn~ty felt that getting dece~ bus service would be our most <br /> noticeabls immediate benefi~ from annexation. Won't you please give the matter further thought by inquiring <br /> into the service we have received in the past, and asking what we may hope for in the future before you positiveSy <br /> turn down the request o f the Portsmouth Transit Company. (Signed) Ralph J Underwood." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Weisema~ that the cormnunication he received and referred to a <br /> Council conference on the bus situation, was 'adopted, without dissenting .vote. <br /> <br /> Civic League, was read: 59-345- The following communication from Guy M Gaskill, President, Hodges Manor <br /> <br /> "The Hodges Manor Civic Lea§ue strongly favors allowing the Portsmouth Transit <br />Company to opermte buses in our area, and respectfully ask 'that you permit them to do so. <br /> <br /> We 'think that the present bus service furnished us by the Co~n~nnity Bus Com- <br />pany at its best is not too good for we have s erv~ce or~ly once each hour, and it has only been since this <br />past November ~6th that we had any buses on a Sunday or holiday. <br /> <br /> It would seem only fair tEat'Mr. Barnes should be reimbursed s fair sum for <br />the portion of his line that the PTC takes over, as has been the practice in similar annexation procedures in <br />this community of late. <br /> <br /> When the annexation of our area by the Ciz~ of POrtsmouth'became a certainty, <br />o~e of the immediate~, benefits we most counted on was a better bus service." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Breedlove that the communication be received as information and <br />referred to a conference of the Council on transit matters, was adopted, without~dissenting ~o,r~. <br /> <br />On motion adjourned. <br /> <br />Approved - <br /> <br />City Clerk <br /> <br /> <br />