|
81
<br />
<br />May 24, 1966
<br />
<br />was taken up mud read:
<br />
<br />vote.:
<br />
<br />was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />vote:
<br />
<br />66-114
<br />
<br />66-115
<br />
<br />66-116
<br />
<br />66-117 -
<br />
<br />- The following ordinance, approved on first reading at last meeting,
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 2-2 OF THE CODE
<br />OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1961, RELATING
<br />TO Tt~E PUBLICATION OR POSTING OF ORDINANCES"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Hastes, the ordinance was adopted, and by the following
<br />
<br />Ayes: Smith,I Dillon, Hastes, Johnson, Knight, Leary
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />- The followingI ordinance, approved on first reading at last meeting,
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE
<br />RETAIL SALES ~
<br />TIONS ENACTED
<br />THERHOF, AND
<br />1966"
<br />
<br />On motion of
<br />
<br />Ayes: Smith,
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />- The following
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE
<br />OF PORTSMOIrrH,
<br />ARTICLE NUMBER
<br />10-126, SO AS
<br />AUTHORIZED TO
<br />OF VIRGINIA,
<br />
<br />On motion of M:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Smith,
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />The following
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE
<br />I ~IPROVEMHNT FUb
<br />GLASGOW EXPRES~
<br />
<br />On motion of M~
<br />
<br />TO REPEAL THECITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA,
<br />ND USE TAX ORDINANCE, ~H RULES AND REGULA-
<br />FOR THH ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCES~NT
<br />LL AMENDMENTS THEREOF, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1,
<br />
<br />r. Leary, the ordinance was adopted, and by the following
<br />Dillon, Hastes, Johnson, Knight, Lea?y
<br />
<br />~rdinance, approved:on first reading at last meeting,
<br />
<br />FO AMEND CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
<br /> VIRGINIA, 1961, BY ADDING THERETO A NEW
<br />~D XVI, CONSISTING OF ANEN SECTION NUMBERED
<br />~ LEVY THE GENERAL RETAIL SALES TAX
<br />;E LEVIED BY SECTION S8-44~.49 OF THE CODE
<br />~50"
<br />
<br />Johnson, the ordinance was ad~Dted, and by the following
<br />
<br />,lion, Hastes, Johnson, Knight, Leafy
<br />
<br />rdinance, approved on first reading at last meeting,
<br />
<br />0 APPROPRIATE $25,000.00 FROM THE CAPITAL
<br />D FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONDON-
<br />I~AY"
<br />
<br />·Eastes, the Ordinance was adopted, and by the following
<br />
<br />-NEW BUSINESS.
<br />
<br /> 66-152 - The following ietition signed by Mrs. F. W. Reinhart and others, was read:
<br /> "This is a pr°te~t about a "rooster" at the residence of J. Arnold,
<br />220 Cherokee Road, Rollingwood. For maintaining a nuisance and disturbing the sleep of residents in
<br />the neighborhood. It starts crowing at a~proxlmatel¥ 4 a.m. Ne request that action be taken by proper
<br />authorities to have the nuisance removed from the above address.
<br /> Signed by Mrs. F. W. Reinhart and others."
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr, Eastes, to refer to the City Attorney for proper handling,
<br />was adopted, without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br />66-155 - The following letter from. Louis E. Turner was read:
<br />
<br /> i . . "In view of the Commonwealth Attorney, Mr. Von Piersall's decision not
<br />to call a grand jury nvestlgatlon of our police lock-up and city jail, and according to his statement
<br />that the Mayor or City Council has the right to call for an investigation such as requested, I would
<br />like permission to appear before you at the next council meeting, May 24, 1966 to present my proposal
<br />for an investigation of the police lock-up and cityjail, Also, to present several constructive suggestions
<br />that I believe will help you in solving the many problems that exist."
<br />
<br />without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Johnson to suspend the rules to hear Mr. Turner, was adopted,
<br />
<br />Mr. Turner spoke regarding the police lock-up and j~ail.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|