Laserfiche WebLink
413 <br /> <br />March 14, 1967 <br /> <br /> To our knowledge March 12, 1967 is the first time the public was made aware of any p~oposed <br />change in subject ordinance, in view of this it is respectfully requested that a representative <br />of this league be permitted to make a few remarks to the Council at the regular City Council meeting <br />of March 14, 1967." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Barnes, rules were suspended to hemr Mr. Keller, ~o spoke, asRing that action <br />on the ordinance be deferred until an item is presented in the press, by the City Manager, explaining <br />the expenditures involved. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Smith to table action on the following ordinance until Mr. Keller's request is <br />granted, was adopted, and by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Smith, Johnson, King, Lea~z <br /> Nays: Barnes, Eastes~ Knight <br /> "~q ORDINanCE TO ;2~END SECTION 10-89 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMO~£H, VIRGINIA, 1961, BY <br />ADDING S~4ITARY SEWERS TO THE LIST OF REQUIRED CAPITAL IMPROV£~NTS SET FORTH~HERBtN" <br /> <br /> 67-60 - "I submit the attached resolution and recommend its adoptidn. This approves a five-Fear <br />Capital Improvement Program for the proposed anneKation area. <br /> This approves the ex?enditure of $5,579,854 ~dr a new school buildings, sewers~ <br />storm drainage, and street and bridge construction. The street and bridge construction is contingent <br />upon the State Highway Department's participation under the current law of 85% State and 15% local <br />funds. <br /> This ~lso approves the expenditure of $902,576 for the purchase of additional equipment <br />to serve the annexed area." <br /> On motion of Mr. King, the following resolution was adopted, without dissenting vote: <br /> "WHEREAS, the Council o~ the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, adopted an ordinance December 9, 1961, <br />to petition the Circuit Court of Norfolk County, VirgSnia, for the annexation of certain territories <br />lying in Norfolk County, now the City of Chesapeake; and <br /> ~HEREAS, said ordinance provided generally for the provisions planned for the future development <br />of the terriiories proposed to be annexed; including the provision of public utilities and services <br />therein; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared an exhibit to be filed with the Court in said annexation <br />proceeding setting forth the details of estimated~costs, projects and programs based upon existing <br />conditions, to carry out the so-called five year capital improvement progr~ for the territories sought <br />to be annexed. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Portsmouth ratifies and approves <br />the Fiye Year Capital Improvement Program for the Annexation Area, in the principal amount of $5,379,854.00 <br />and the purchase of additional equipment to serve said area in the principal amount of $902,376.00 as <br />detailed upon an exhibit presented by the City Manager, which said exhibit is to be filed in the <br />annexation proceedings and a copy of which is to be filed with the minutes of this meeting. Capital <br />improvements for streets and highways as depicted in said exhi§it are contingent upon said projects being <br />financed not to exceed fifteen per cent by the City of Portsmouth through Federal ~nd State programs." <br /> <br /> 67-61 - "I s~omit the attached resolution and recommend its adootion. This authorizes the signing <br />of a contract for a grant Under the Open Space Program, <br /> It is necessary to sign this contract in order that we can receive our Federal <br />fUnds ~o cover the purchase of the 0bici property." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr, Bastes, the following resolution ~as adopted, without dissenting, vote: <br /> "WHEREAS, the City of Portsmouth (the "Appi~icant"), has heretofore submitted an application <br />to the United States of America, Department of Housing and Urban Develooment (the "Government"), for <br />a grant under Title VII of the Housing Act of 1961, as amended, with respect to a certain project <br />identified as Project No. VA 0SA-25, for the purpose designated in the said application; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Government has approved the said application s~bject to certain conditions <br />and has submitted to the Applicant a certain Contract for Grant identified as Contract No. VA OSA-25(G) <br />(the "Contract")~ ~ar approval and execution by the Applicant, which said contract is ~atisfactory, <br /> NOW/?THEREFORE, BE-IT RESOLVED BY THE Council of the Applicant, that the said Contract, a copy <br />of which is attached hereto, be and the same is hereby approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized <br />and directed to execute the said Contract in the name and on behalf of the Applicant, in as many <br />counterparts as maybe necessary, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix or <br />impress the official seal of the Applicant thereon and to attest the same. The orooer officer is directed <br />to fegw~rrd the said executed counterparts of the said Contract to be Government, together with such <br />other documents evidencing the approval and authorization to execute the same as may be required by the <br />Government." <br /> <br />-UNFINISHED BUSINESS- <br /> <br /> 67-46 - The following communication from the Director of Planning was read: <br /> "A~ ils regular monthly meeting on March 7, 1967, the City Planning Commission at your <br />request again reviewed the matter of commercial rezoning on the southwest corner of Deep Creek <br />Boulevard and Elliott Avenue. <br /> At this open public meeting, the Planning Commission was advised of petitions received <br />by City Council favoring approval of rezoning petition Z-67-3 and was presented the very handsome <br />model submitted at your public hearing in connection with the proposal. <br /> However, the Planning Com=mission resolved to stand by its earlier position and recommend <br />denial of this application for ~easons stated. <br /> The Commission ex?teases appreciation for your interest in its opiniQn and for your concern <br />over proper public presentation of all relevant facts." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Knight to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission to disapprove the <br />application, was adopted, without dissenting vote. <br /> <br /> <br />