|
March 25, 1969
<br />
<br />~at the use for which the use permit hereinafter described is sought (1)will not adversely
<br />affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
<br />use, (2) will not be detrimental to the p~Dlic welfare or injurious to property or improvements
<br />in the neighborhood, and (3) will be in accord with the purposes of said Zoning Ordinance.
<br />
<br />That Sinclair 0il Corporation is hereby granted a use permit, subject to site plan restrictions,
<br />pursuant to Section 4-2 of said Zoning Ordinance, for the reopening_ and operation of an existing
<br />automotive service station located on the property described as follows:
<br />
<br />Beginning at a point 143 feet Southeast of the Southeast corner of High Street and Rockbridge Road;
<br />thence Southeast albng High Street 125 feet to a point; thence Southwest 100 feet to Princeton Place;
<br />thence running Northwest 116 feet to a point; thence running Northeast 92 feet to a point; thence
<br />running Northwest 9 feet to a point; thence running Northeast 8 feet to the point of beginning."
<br />
<br />Use Permit 69-4 - Petition of the Portsmouth Water Department
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Jol%nson, the following resolution was adopted, without o~ssentzno vote:
<br />
<br />"A RESOLUTION GRJ2,rFING A USE PEPS{IT FOR ~{E CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A
<br /> ~A~ER TANK ON
<br />~{E NOR~[ SIDE OF WEST NORFOLK ROAD, UP-69-4
<br />
<br /> %~{EREAS, the Portsmouth Water Department has made an application pursuant to Section 4-2 of the Zoning
<br />Ordinance of the City of Portsmouth, 1961, for the granting of a use permit as hereinafter described; - ·
<br />
<br /> ~tEREAS, the applicant, the Planning Director and the City Mmnager have done all things required to be
<br />done in connection with said application, and the Planning Commission has recommended the grant~ng of said
<br />use permit, subject to the conditions hereinafter stated.
<br />
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVHD by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, V~o~nma,
<br />
<br />That the use ~or which the use permit hereinafter described is sought (1~ will not adversely
<br />affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
<br />use, (2) will not be detrimental to the p~olic welfare or injurious to property or improvements
<br />in the neighborhood, and (3) will be in accord with the purposes of sai~ Zoning Ordinance.
<br />
<br />That the Portsmouth Water Department is hereby granted a use permit, subject to site plan res-
<br />trictions, pursuant to SectiOn 4-2 of said Zoning Ordinance, ~or the construction and~operation
<br />of a water tank located on tko property described as follows:
<br />
<br />Beginning at a point on the rear property line of properties fronting the North side of West
<br />Norfolk Road, said point being 730.85 feet West from the South right of way line of ~he Norfolk,
<br />Franklin ~ Danville Railway; running thence West along said rear line 199.45 feet to the Hampton
<br />Roads Sanitation District Commission P~mping Site; thence running North along said site 162.75 feet
<br />to the Southern right of way line of said railway; thence running East along said right of way 200
<br />feet to a point; thence running South 165.57 feet to the point of origin."
<br />
<br />Us~..~ermit 68-24 - Petition of Tinee Giant Properties Corporation
<br />
<br />Vincent J. Mastracco, Jr. spoke for the application.
<br />
<br /> E. W. Lewis, representing Westhaven Park Civic League, L. T. Winslow, Corey Dell, vice president,
<br />Democratic Committee spoke in opposition.
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Holley to deny the use permit was adopt~, with one dissenting vote,
<br />
<br />that of Mr. Smith.
<br />
<br />69-90 - The following zoning ordinance was read:
<br />
<br />";~ ORDINANCE TO ;~qEND /NtH ZONING 0RDINJuNCE OF ~{E CITY OF PORTSMOI~H, 1961, BY A~iENDING
<br />SECTION 5-7 THEREOF, PROVIDING DIMENSIONAL REQUIRHMHN~FS FOR T}~ CONSTRUCTION OF ROW HOUSES
<br />IN ~{E RESIDENTIAL R-7S DISTRICT."
<br />
<br />No one spole~
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Hastes, the ordinance was approved on first reading, without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br />The following reports from the City Manager were read:
<br />
<br /> 69-91 - "I sffbmit the attached ordinance and recommend it be olaced on first reading. This appropriates
<br />$10,000 for improvements to the intersection of Victory Boulevard ~nd Airline Boulevard.
<br />
<br /> The right-of-way has been donated and we will now be able to add an additional lane on Airline Boulevard
<br />through this intersection. This will provide approximately three times the existing capacity for ta~s~ ' ~nt~r-' ~
<br />section. The estimated cost for the traffic improvements to this intersection is $2,600.
<br />
<br /> l~%ile this intersection is.under construction, it will also be in the interests of the City to install
<br />a storm drainage system to eliminate the flooding condtions at this intersection. It will require the instal-
<br />lation of a 52-inch culvert to handle this water and will cost approximately $6,800."
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Smith, the following ordin~uce was approved on first reading Without dissenting vote:
<br />
<br />"Agq ORDINkNCE TO APPROPRIATE $10,000.00 FROM ~H= GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT .
<br />FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE AIRLINE BOULEV;~V.D-VtCTORY BOULEVARD IN~fERC~D%2{GE.''
<br />
<br />
<br />
|