Laserfiche WebLink
Carter-Bell Corporation <br /> Less <br /> TOiAL <br /> <br />L'~ke Constructioh Company~ Inc. <br /> Less <br /> TOTAL <br /> <br />$118~586.00 <br /> 2,358.00 <br /> <br />$118,600.00 <br />7,097.75 <br />~111,502.25~ <br /> <br /> If the pilings are required to be 55 feet in length, which is 5 feet over the length <br />it is estimated to take for this Job~ the following results would occur in the bids: <br /> <br />Stuart Bolling Company~ Inc. <br /> Plus <br /> TOTAL <br /> <br />$118~440.00 <br /> 9,541.25 <br /> <br />Carter-Bell 0orporation <br /> Plus <br /> TOTAL <br /> <br />$118~586.00 <br /> 7~1!5.90 <br />~125,701.90 <br /> <br />Luke Construction Company, Inc. $118,600.00 <br /> Plus 3,902.75 <br /> TOTAL <br /> <br />$122~502.75 <br /> <br /> It is expected that quantities will vary and this accounts for the request for adjustin <br />prices and the statement in the proposal form that the City will compare such and will <br />award to serve the best interests of the City. The bid of Luke Construction Company <br />will~ with variances, result in a lesser total cost to the City. It is~ therefore, the <br />recommendation of the Consulting Engineers that the bid be awarded to Luke Construction <br />Company~ and I concur with their recommendation." <br /> <br /> On motion Of Mr. Smith, the following ordinance was approved on first reading~ with- <br />out dissenting vote: <br /> <br /> ~AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $13~000.00 FROM THE UTILITY FUND FOR THE <br /> CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK." <br />Motion of Mr. Holley to award bid to Lu~e Construction Co., was adopted, without dissenting vote. <br />70-124 - "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first reading. <br />This appropriates $135.20 for the refund of Real Estate Taxes due to erroneous assess- <br />ments. <br /> <br /> At the time of annexation~ the following streets were not accounted for by the City <br />of Chesapeake --Riverside Lane, Cherry Drive and Floral Lane. After considerable research, <br />one-half of each street was charged to the abutting property owner. However, more recent <br />information indicates that the streets are actually owned by the original developer. <br />These taxes Were collected from January 1~ t969~ through July 1, 1969, and it is necessary <br />to rebate the owners the following: <br /> <br />Sarah B. ~aimas~ <br />Donald W. & Sarah G.~ Comer <br />Herman M. & Mary D. Kunkle <br />Samuel J. & Hary E. Major <br />Walter T. H. & Genevieve <br /> Galliford <br />John V. & Charlotte Turtle <br /> <br />$ 20.25 <br />$;20.75 <br />$ 2o.92 <br />$ 27.62 <br /> <br />$ 25.08 <br />$20.58" <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. King~ the following ordinance was approved on first reading, with- <br />out dissenting vote: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $135.20 FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE <br />REFUND OF EXCESS REAL ESTATE TAXES PAID IN 1969 DUE TO ERRONEOUS <br />ASSESS}~NTS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES." <br /> <br /> 70-125 - '~I submit the attached ordinanceiand recommend it be placed on first reading. <br />This repeals Section 18-110 of the City Code to make London Street, between Crawford <br />Street and Williamsburg Avenue, a two-way street. <br /> <br /> This is being done to facilitate the movement of traffic in and around the downtown <br />area due to the construction of the London-Glasgow Street Highway. A study of this has <br />been made by the City Traffic Engineer and he recommends that this street be made two- <br />way." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Turner, the following ordinance was approved on first reading~ with- <br />out dissenting vote: <br /> <br /> ORDIND~Cm TO REPEAL SECTION 18-110 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF <br />PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1961, TO MAKE LONDON STREET BETWEEN CRAWPORD STREET <br />AND WILLIA~SBURGAVENUEW A TWO-WAY STP~ET." <br /> <br /> <br />