Laserfiche WebLink
1970 <br /> <br />police department and the community in which they serve. <br /> <br />II. NEIGHBOKHOQR C00BERAT,,ION COb,~ITTEES~ <br /> <br /> Attached hereto you will find prposed ordinance which your committee asked the City Attorney to prepare. <br />This provides for the establishment of Neighborhood CooperaTion Committees with the citizens of these neighbor- <br />hoods selecting their own steering committees and officers. W~ile these committees may initially be primarily <br />complaint oriented, we feel they will soon emerge as positive community action directed groups. You will note <br />we did not use the word "Police" in the designation of these committees, This is because we feel they will <br />soon outgrow the field of Police-Community relations and seek to bring their neibhborhoods into better under- <br />standing and cooperation with all departments of the city. <br /> <br />Iit. CITIZEN CO~ LAINTS <br /> <br /> Your committee did not recommend establishment of a civilian police review board because we believe the <br />complaints of all citizens insofar as their relationship with the police department be concerned can be ad- <br />equately handled under present Police Department procedures, city.ordinances and the city charter. <br /> <br /> The police department has an internal review board whid~ will investigate the co~Dlaints of any citizen <br />submitted in writing, and it will take appropriate action if it finds any wrongdoing on ~he part of any police <br />officer. <br /> <br /> The Citizens Advisory Committee has broad powers under presentor~inances, and we feel it can be of great <br />help to any citizen who seeks its aid. It can act as a clearing house'to channel complaints to properLaction <br />agency, be it the police department of some other agency or department of the city. It should be especially <br />helpful To Neighborhood Cooperation Committees in those areas not served by a Police-Community Relations <br />officer. <br /> <br /> The Civil Service Commission has broad i~vestigative and penal powers ~nder Sections 11.02, 11.12 and <br />11.15 of the new city charter. Upon written complaint of any citizen, in writing, it can subpoena witnesses, <br />conduct hearings and impose penalties for violation of civil service rules and regulations. <br /> <br />IV. INTRA-DEPART~NT PUBLIC RELATIONS pOLICE OFFICER TRAINING <br /> <br /> We believe an expanded program in education and training within the police department would better equip <br />our police officers to meet our problems in public relations. The content of this program should be focuMed <br />a~ound human relations so that the police officer will come toknm~, and understandt~e causes of abnormal <br />conditions ... poverty, unemployment, delinquency, drug addiction, apathy ... which they encounter everyday. <br /> <br /> We also recommend that police officers be encouraged to enroll in courses in law enforcement now offered <br />at Old Domini.on University and Frederick College. <br /> <br />V, ADEQUATE ,P,OLICE DEPARTb~INT PERSONNEL <br /> <br /> Chief Warren has stated that discontinuing foot patrols and placing officers in cars resulted in a los~ <br />of contact and communication between the citizens and the police. He feels the establishment of Police-Com- <br />sunity Relations Offices in the above mentioned neighbo~mods will be a big step in correcting that problem. <br />We, therefore, join Chief Warren in his request for additional officers. <br /> <br /> We also recommend the establishment of a Police Cadet Program particularly during the summer months whimh <br />would release regular police officers for more efficient use of their skills. Police Cadets would not bear <br />arn~s or have power of arrest, but they could serve as walkie-talkie observation posts, meter readers and do other <br />routine ta~ks. Many cities have found a Police Cadet program effective in recruitment of prospective police <br />officers as well as a means of providing summer employment for eligible young men of all races. <br /> <br />VI. FUNDING THESE PROGR~4S <br /> <br /> Your Committee is cognizant of the fact that these programs will be expensive. We feel that nilot proc <br />gram~ ~:~n be~-funded~ through at~easZ-twp~sources which have been brought to our attention. The Omnibus ~rim: <br />Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-3SI) provi_des for matching fund grants for such programs. We <br />are ~lso informed that the Ford Foundation has recently established a Police Devmlopment Fund of $50 million <br />for five years to help local police departments make innovations to their functions, trainln~ and types of <br />personnel. This program is to encourage police to define new standards and raise the levels of their own pro- <br />fession. <br /> <br /> In conclusion your committee suggests that our first two proposals be implemented as soon as possible. <br />~o recent newspaper articles prompt this suggestion. The first dealt with the pleas of a local minister for <br />aid in protecting his church and neighborhood from vandals, and the second cited the fact ~]at our firemen <br />were stoned recently when they answered a fire alarm. These incidents indicate the need for an all-out effort <br />on behalf of all our citigens, black and white, to cooperate with the police department in reducing crime and <br />violence in our city. <br /> <br />Respectfully subiit[~d this 11 day of August, 1~70. <br /> <br />Donald H. Sandie ...... <br />Ch airman ...... <br />James A. Overton <br />Vi ce- Ch airman <br /> <br />Secretary <br />Rev. Harvey N. Johnson, Sr. <br />L. David LmndaUrer <br />T. ~udson ~right;, jIilI <br />Frank H. Keeling , <br />~4ichael A. Korb, Jr. <br />J. Frank I{illiams <br />~ordon W. Slaterbeck <br /> <br /> <br />