|
879
<br />
<br /> This
<br />~is recommended this be increased to $7.S0.
<br />
<br />71-297 "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first reading.
<br />amends the fee charged for driveway permits. The present fee charged is 50~ and it
<br />
<br />This
<br />to
<br />is
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Raymond Smith and seconded by Mr. King, the following ordinance was
<br />approved on first fading, and by?the following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION $1-4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORISMOUTH,
<br />VIRGINIA, 1961, INCREASING THE FEE FOR PLANS FOR DRIVEWAYS."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, J~hnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> be placed on first reading.
<br /> well as the inhaling of
<br />
<br /> 71-298 '~I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it
<br />This pertains to the sale of glue or other noxious chemicals as
<br />these substances.
<br />
<br /> It establishes this as a misdemeanor and provides a fine and jail sentence for the
<br />illegal use of these substances. This ordinance parallels the State Code and is the maximum
<br />that the City can adopt."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Irvine Smith and seconded by Mr. Johnson, the following ordinance was
<br />approved on first reading, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE 0F[THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1961,
<br />BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION NUMBERED 19-84, RELATING TO ILLEGAL USE OF
<br />CERTAIN NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES OR CHEMICALS."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 71-299 - "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first reading.
<br />This appropriates $550,000 for the construction of sewers in the Elizabeth Manor area of
<br />the City. It is in accord with the City's program for sewering the City.
<br />
<br />Bids were received on June 22, 1971, for this
<br />
<br />A & W Contractors, Inc.
<br />
<br />A. Stuart Bolling Company, Inc.
<br />
<br />A. G. Pinkston Company
<br />
<br />Roanoke Construction Company, Inc.
<br />
<br />work as follows:
<br /> $585,491.93
<br /> $353,297.10
<br /> $382,200.95
<br /> $507,268.50
<br />
<br /> Roanoke Construction Company being the low bidder, I recommend the contract
<br />this firm.
<br />
<br />The appropriation includes the engineering and inspection fees."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. King and seconded by Mr. Turner, the following ordinance was
<br />on first reading, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $330,000 FROMTTHE UTILITY FUND FOR THE
<br />CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS IN THE ELIZABETH MANOR AREA."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner,
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Raymond Smith and seconded by Mr. Irvine Smith, Roanoke Construction
<br />Company, Inc., being the low bidder, was awarded the contract by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, BAmmes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 71-300 - "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first reading.
<br /> appropriates $473,000 for the construction of Elmhurst Lane and the necessary drainage
<br />properly drain the Manor High School site. These two projects were combined as there
<br />
<br /> m substantial savings by doing the two projects
<br /> Bids were received on July t, 1971, for this
<br /> Birsch Construction Corporation
<br /> A. Stuart Bolling Company, Inc.
<br />
<br /> Birsch Construction Company being the low bidder,
<br />to this firm."
<br />
<br /> together.
<br />
<br />construction as follows:
<br /> $448,926.87
<br /> $539,476.00
<br />
<br /> I recommend the contract be awarded
<br />
<br />be awarded
<br />
<br />approved
<br />
<br /> It will place this fee in line with other inspection fees recently adopted. The S0~
<br />fee does not cover the cost of the paper work involved. Also, the construction has to be
<br />inspected by the City's inspectors which is an additional expense."
<br />
<br />
<br />
|