Laserfiche WebLink
July 1S~ 1971 <br /> <br />At a regular meeting of the City Council, hold on July 13, 1971, there wore present: <br /> <br />Jack P. Barnes, James W. Holley, Burrell R. Johnson, Isaac W. King, R. Irvine Smith, <br />Raymond Smith, Raymond Turner, A. P. Johnson, Jr., City Manager, and M. A. Kerb, Jr., <br />City Attorney. <br /> <br />The meeting was opened with prayer by Mr. King. <br /> <br />Mayor Barnes extended a word of welcome to the visitors. <br /> <br /> Minutes of the regular meeting 6f the City Council, held on Juno 22, 1971, wore approve¢ <br />as submitted. <br /> <br /> 71-294 The following report was ~resented by Mr. W. H. Blackwell, Jr., Chairman, <br />Craney Island Study Commission: <br /> <br /> "As prescribed in Ordinance No. 1969-10 adopted by the City Council of Portsmouth on <br />February 25, 1969, the Craney Island Study Commission has studied possible uses of the Crane~ <br />Island disposal or land fill area. In this report the term "Craney Island" will be used to <br />describe the fill area of approximately 2550 acres trapezoidal in configuration with an off <br />shore east-west length of 1.7 miles and in shore east-west length of 2.1 miles and a north- <br />south elngth of 2.1 miles. The Study Commission has toured the Craney Island area by both <br />land and water as a guest of the Corps of Engineers and the Corps described to the Commissio~ <br />on the engineering and economic studies and the design criteria when the fill area was creat- <br />ed for deposit of spoils dredged from the Hampton Roads Harbor. We have also reviewed stud- <br />ies and publications concerning Craney ~sland including the following: <br /> <br />1. The Hammer-Greene-Sile~Report on Impact of Thi <br /> Transportation S~udy Committee Hampton Roads <br />2. Proceedings of a Public Forum on Craney Island <br /> Virginia Planning District Commission. <br />S. Portsmouth Problems, Prospects and Potentials <br /> Associates. <br />4. CManey Island Study Division of State Plannin <br /> <br />rd Crossing to the Joint <br />region. <br />Fill Area Southeastern <br /> <br />Hammer-Greene-Siler and <br /> <br />g and Community Affairs. <br /> <br /> The Craney Island Study Commission recognizes the urgent~financial problems that face <br />Portsmouth and the other Tidewater regional jurisdictions which will be affected by the de- <br />velopment of Craney Island, therefore, we have adopted as a basic premise the facts that <br />Craney Island must be completed as presently planned within the present boundaries; that <br />development of Craney Island must result in strengthening of the economy of the Tidewater <br />area; and that this development must result in expansion in the tax base of the City of <br />Portsmouth in which Craney Island is located. Therefore, the following development alterna- <br />tives weme considered for this area: <br /> <br /> Industrial <br /> Seaport Facilities <br /> Commercial <br /> Transportation <br /> Recreational <br /> Airport Facilities <br /> Housing <br /> <br /> In addition, the physical characteristics of the fill area, accessibility of the area <br />to highways, railroads, and utilities and the impact which the various types of development <br />might have on both areas contiguous to Craney Island and the regional surrounding areas were <br />studied. <br /> <br /> From our consideration of the foregoing, the Craney Island Study Commission unanimously <br />recommends to City Council of Portsmouth that industrial development of Craney Island be <br />given the highest priority with port development next in order. We further conclude that <br />there is adequate room for commercial and recreational development on the western side of <br />Craney Island and that this will complement and enhance the industrial and port development <br />of the center and eastern sections. We further recommend that a corridor for a major limited <br />access highway, railroads and utilities will be necessary and will serve as a buffer zone be- <br />tween the Industrial~Port and the Commercial-Recreational area. <br /> <br /> While the foregoing recommendations of the Craney Island Study Commission complete the <br />duties of the Commission as outlined in the enabling ordinance, we feel that there are severa <br />other major factors relating to development of Craney Island which should be of concern to <br />the City of Portsmouth. <br /> <br /> The Craney Island area was conveyed to the Federal Government by the Commonwealth of <br />Virginia in 1948. There are some provisions in the Deed of Conveyance which could be con- <br />strued to mean that the fill area will revert to the Commonwealth of Virginia when the pro- <br />ject is completed. However, the Study Commission does not feel that this is sufficient to <br />rely upon to make sure that this area with its tremendous importance to the future of Ports~ <br />mouth and the Tidewater area indeed does become available for development as recommended by <br />the Study Commission. We therefore recommend and urge that a concerted effort be made by the <br />City of Portsmouth to assure the availability of Craney Island for development. Due to the <br />economic'benefits resulting to the entire Tidewater area from such development, we further <br />recommend that the aid of the other cities and counties in the Hampton Roads area be solicite <br />in this effort. The River and Harbor Act of 1960 (Public Law 86-645) gives the Secretary <br />of the Army authority to dispose of certain federal property. The following is quoted from <br />that act: <br /> <br /> <br />