Laserfiche WebLink
June 1975 <br /> <br />mit a corrected document as Der your soggestions. We had intended to confer further with the I <br />Park and Recreation Commission, but these past few months have not provided such an opportuni] <br />ry. · <br /> <br /> Regarding your four comments: (1) We dropped the reference to a waterfront park on <br />Paradise Creek in southeast Portsmouth which on CP-70-1 was located on surFlus~government pro- <br />perty, (2) We clarified the status of public open space east of Crawford Street in CP-75-2 <br />documents dealing with the downtown waterfront, (3) We assume that expansion of the Pinners <br />Point Marine Terminals complex will engoif land on Scotts Creek and have switched its proposed <br />designation to industri&l, and (4) We have discarded the Beazley Farm proposal in ~est Nor- <br />folk and switched its proposed designation to residential-low density. However, the Planning <br />Commission is still concerned over The adequacy of onen space in older oarts of this metropo- <br />litan core city. <br /> In acting on recreational open space elements of CP-75-1, City Council might consider <br /> these resolves: (1) The Planning Commission and revamped Park & Recreation Commission should <br /> be authorized/instructed to move on a joint study of cQre city recreational needs. (2) The <br /> Planning Commission and School Board should be authorizedz~nstruc~ed to move on a joint study <br /> of school site deficiencies, if/how a remedial program might be instituted or extended, and <br /> whether State aid should be sought in areas of high urban density to compensate for a lack of <br /> yards and parks as part of our Commonwealth's new awareness of the needs of i~s highly urban- <br /> ized population, and (3) The School Board and Parlkg Recreational Commision should extend <br /> its study of how school playgrounds can be used to the maximum extent in areas of high urban <br /> density where poverty and mobility bind elements of our population to their section of the <br /> city. <br /> Because the Planning Commission felt that much good came out of our collective efforts <br /> five yemrs ago on CP-70-1, there is a hope that City Council will authorize the City Manager <br /> to proceed with the pro~ess of finalization and publication. If we are to involve more of <br /> our citizens in this process of local government, we must have access to tools such as <br /> CP-75-1 with which to inform and stimulate them." <br /> No one spore for or against, received as information and <br /> Motion of Mr. Elliott and seconded by Mr. B~rnes, zo be/referred to the City Manager and <br /> a report be furnished, was adopted by unanimous vote. <br /> 75-233 CP-75-2 Amending the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Portsmouth. <br /> <br />CP-75-2-a <br />CP-75-1-b <br />CP-75-2-c <br />CP-75-2-d <br /> <br />LAND USE PLAN, Waterfront Development. <br />1985 SITE PLAN, publ'ic and private usage. <br />Vehicular Circulation g Parking, Waterfront. <br />Pedestrian Circulation, Waterfront Development. <br /> <br /> No one spoke for or against. <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Early, <br />report be furnished, was adopted by unanimous vot9z <br /> <br /> received as <br />to be/referred to <br /> <br />Waterfront~,r~,D~fn~ D:is~ricC'-- CP-72-2 <br /> <br /> Section 40-81 <br /> Section 40-139 <br /> <br />information and ~ <br />the City Manager~ and a <br /> <br />Waterfront W-I District uses. <br />Waterfront W-] District Dimensional requirements. <br /> <br /> No one spore for or against. <br /> Motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Elliot,, to be received <br />ferred to the City Manager and a report be furnished, was adopted by <br /> Amendments Regulation of Condominiums <br /> <br /> Section 4-31 <br /> Section 4-55 <br />~Section 3~-2 <br /> Section ~S-3 <br /> <br />as information and re- <br />unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> Definition-Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Group Housing Project Review-Zoning Ordinance. <br />- Definitions-Subdivision Ordinance. <br />- Preparation and Recordation of Subdivision Plats. <br /> <br />No one spoke for or against. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. <br />Planning Commission for approval, and direct <br />was adopted by unanimous vote. <br /> <br />Zoning Ordinances <br /> <br />east, to concur in the recommendation of the <br />the C~ty Attorney to put in proper legat form, <br /> <br />- Historic~~ District <br /> <br /> No one spoke for or against. <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Eazly, that Cradock be included at this time. <br /> Substitute motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Elliott, to be referred to the City <br />Manager and a report be furnished and to include Historic Districts on zoning maps, was adopt~ <br />by unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> Amendment Zoning Ordinance Tex~ ApFlication from Director of Public <br /> Health and others. <br /> <br />Sec. ~0-76 Ia) 0R-75 permitted p~r se. <br />Sec. 40-78 (a) R-60 permitted per se. <br />Sec. 4D-79 (a) R-60-A permitted per se. <br />Sec. 40-70 (b) C-t, subject to a use permit. <br />Sec. 40~7~ (b) C-2, subject to a use permit. <br />Sec. 40-31 Definitions <br /> <br /> <br />