|
13,2
<br />
<br />June 9. 1975
<br />
<br /> At the Public Hearing meeting of City Council, held on June 9, 1975, there were
<br />
<br /> Richard J. Davis, Jack P. Barnes, E. Saunders Early, Jr., Archie Elliott, Jr.,
<br /> James W. Holley, Edward L. Oast, Jr., Rs~T~-W~l-l~Ci.t~Manager, H. M. Myers,
<br /> Jr., Assistant City Manager, Gordon B. Tayloe, Jr., City Attorney.
<br />
<br /> Absent: Robert W. Wentz, Jr.
<br />
<br /> Mayor Davis welcomed all visitors in attendance and the Pledge of Allegiance to the
<br />Flag was recited.
<br />
<br />present:
<br />
<br /> 75-133 Z 75-5~- Petition of Alice N. & Martin M. Ovsen deferred from Public Hearing
<br />on April 7, 19?S--~s presented. '
<br />
<br /> The following letter received f~om John R. Porter Jr. Attorney, representing the
<br />above pF~i~i~n~, was read.' ' '
<br />
<br /> "I am attorney for the Ovsens in the above pet~t~h w~ic~ was c~nt~hued until June 9,
<br />1975. tt is my intention to withdraw this request for rezoning and I Shall appreciate your
<br />clearing this for me.'
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Holley, to concur in the request, the petition
<br />was withdrawn, and by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br /> 75-233
<br />revisions to
<br />
<br />Public Hearing on rezoning petitions, Comprehensive Plan amendments and
<br />the texts of the Subdivision Code and the Zoning Ordinance was held:
<br />
<br /> Zoning Petition Z 75-9 - Petition of Columbia Yacht Corporation.
<br />
<br /> Motion by Mr. Oast and seconded by Mr. Early, the matter to be deferred
<br />Hearing ~n August, was denied, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Etliott, Oast, Davis
<br /> Nays: Barnes, Early, Holley
<br />
<br />until the Public
<br />
<br />Zoning Petition Z 75-6
<br />
<br /> Motioneof Mr. Holley and
<br />approved on first reading, was
<br />
<br />"ZONING
<br />
<br /> Petition of Portsmouth Redevelopment ~ Housing Authority.
<br />
<br /> seconded by Mr. Barnes, that the following ordinance be
<br /> adep~ed by the following vote:
<br />
<br />AMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z 75-6"
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Early, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> Zoning Petition Z 75-8 Petition of Harold C. Beaver and Dr. Richard Barrick.
<br />
<br /> Glenn Yates, Jr., Agent, representing Ya~es and Berkley, spoke for the petition.
<br />
<br /> B. K. Rowley, 832 Stanley Road, representing the Simonsdale Civic Club, spoke against.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Hollsy, the following ordinanc~ be approved
<br />on first reading, was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> "ZONING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE 2 75-8"
<br />
<br />Ayes: Early, Eltiott, Holley, Oas~t, Davis
<br />Nays: Barnes
<br />
<br /> Zoning Petition Z ?5-9 Petition of Columbia Yacht Corporation
<br />
<br /> The following citizens spoke for the petition:
<br /> Richard B. Bartlett, Attorney, representing Columbia Yacht Corporation.
<br /> Ms. Jean Singleton, 2701 Bayview Boulevard.
<br />
<br /> The following citizens spoke against the petition:
<br /> Mrs. James Folkes, 323 Mt. Vernon Avenue, representing the Port Norfolk Civic League.
<br /> Mrs. Judy Harrell, 153 Florida Avenue, representing the Port Norfolk Civic League.
<br /> H. H. Young, 441 Chautauqua Avenue, representing the Port Norfolk Civic League.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Barnes, the petition to be denied, was adopted
<br />by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Early, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 75-60 CP-75-1 The following letter received from Chairman W. D. Beard ~lanning
<br />Commission, was presented: '
<br />
<br /> "During the course of your February 10th public hearing, consideration was extended to
<br />a comprehensive City Plan digest document titled "CP-?5-1". Pursuant to Chapter 11, Article
<br />4, paragraph 15.1-454 of the Code of Virginia, the CityPPlanning Commission had sought to up-
<br />date the comprehensive plan document "CP-T0-1" approved by City Council five years ago. City
<br />Council expressed concern over two items, waterfront park proposals and that all of Craney
<br />Island was not shown on the map. The Commission discussed these matters and resolved to sub-
<br />
<br />
<br />
|