|
129
<br />
<br />February 7, 1977
<br />
<br /> "We, the undersigned residents of the area oppose the rezoning as proposed by Harold C.
<br />Beaver to rezone property as described in Petition Z 77-6 from Commercial C-1 to Residential
<br />R-60ZA. Signed by Wanita R. Smith, 619 Elmhhrst Lane and others.V
<br />
<br />Robert J. Long, 117 Patnor Drive, spoke against the petition.
<br />
<br /> 18 Citizens stood opposing the petition.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr~ Early, to concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission, the petition was denied, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes,
<br />Nays: None
<br />Abstaining: Wentz
<br />
<br />Early, Elliott,
<br />
<br />Nolley, Oast
<br />
<br />(g) Zoning Petition Z 77-7 - Petition of Clarence J., Jr. and PAyllis Wright, Owners.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr'. Early a~d s~conded bY Mr. Elliott, to concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission, the petition was denied, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Barnes, Early, Elliott, Holtey, Oast, Wentz
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> (h) Zoning Petition Z 77-8 - Petition of Christian Broadcasting Network, Inc., Contract
<br /> Owner.
<br /> On motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Elliott, the followin~ordinance to be approve
<br />first reading for 0R-75 as recommended by the Planning Commission,an!d~Wa~.~adopted by unanimou~
<br />vote:
<br /> "ZONING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z 77-8"
<br />
<br />(i) Use Permit UP 77-1 - Petition of the Effingham Branch Y.M.C.A. of Portsmouth.
<br />
<br />The following citizens spoke for the petition: :
<br />
<br />John Mino~, Member of the EffinghamY~M:~.£.A. Board.
<br />Jim Witt, Woodbridge, Virginia, representing Volunteers of America.
<br />Ja~es M. Nixon, Executive Director of the Effingham Y.M.C.A.
<br />Rev. Tom Watson, Chaplain of project.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Holley, to be referred to the City Attorney to
<br />determine if a conditional use permit can be issued in accordance with the Code, and was
<br />adopted by 5-1 (Abs~aining-Elliott) vote.
<br />
<br /> Motion ~f Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Elliott, to be referred to the Planning commissi
<br />for further study to determine whether this type of facility should be included in the Zoning
<br />Ordinance, and was adopted by Bnanimous vote.
<br />
<br />(j) REVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 40-51, EXISTING PLOTS OF INSUFFICIENT SIZE.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Oast and seconded by Mr. Early, to concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission, and to be approved on first reading, was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Early, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Wentz
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />(k) REVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 40-210, JURISDICTION, POWERS AND DUTIES OF
<br />
<br />THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. (3a-Extraction of Raw Materials)
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Oast and sec by Mr. Barnes, to concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission, and to be approved on first reading, was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Early, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Wentz
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />On motion adjourned.
<br />
<br />APPROVED
<br />
<br />City Clerk
<br />
<br />On
<br />
<br />
<br />
|