2025 Ordinances - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7. Indicates the location of dredge material and location of dumping area for such material; 8. Indicates the location of and impacts on shellfish beds, submerged aquatic vegetation, and fish spawning areas; and 9. Describes the proposed mitigation measures for the potential hydrogeological impacts which may include: (i) Proposed erosion and sediment control concepts which may include minimizing the extent of the cleared area, perimeter controls, reduction of runoff velocities, measures to stabilize disturbed areas, schedule and personnel for site inspection; (ii) Proposed stormwater management system; (iii) Creation of wetlands to replace those lost; and (iv) Minimizing cut and fill. A landscape element that describes the proposed measures for mitigation of the water quality and land impacts within CBPAs. Possible mitigation measures include: Replanting schedule for trees and other significant vegetation removed for construction, in accordance with section 40.2-304(J) of this Code. 2. Demonstration that the design of the plan will preserve to the greatest extent possible any significant trees and vegetation on the site and will provide maximum erosion control and overland flow benefits from such vegetation. 3. Demonstration that indigenous plants are to be used to the greatest extent possible. (5) Evaluation procedure. a. Upon the completed review of a minor water quality impact assessment, the city engineer will determine if the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The proposed encroachment is necessary due to the inability to place improvements elsewhere on the site to avoid disturbance of the buffer area; 2. Land disturbance and impervious surfaces area is minimized and existing vegetation is preserved to the extent practicable given the site conditions and the proposed use; Proposed vegetative mitigation measures, including the revegetation plan and site design, result in minimal disturbance to all components of the RPA, including the 100 -foot buffer area; 4. Additional best management practices proposed, where required, achieve the requisite reductions in pollutant loadings; and 5. The development, as proposed, meets the purpose and intent of this chapter. b. Upon the completed review of a major water quality impact assessment, the city engineer will determine if the proposed development is consistent with the 19