2019 Ordinances - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(8) Such additional materials as are listed on the application form established by the city engineer and are reasonably required by the city engineer to the extent permitted by law to determine the approvability of a permit in accordance with section 32 -365. (c) Any application not including all of the information listed in this section may be deemed incomplete by the city engineer. Sec. 32- 365. —Application review process -•• Provided applicant has provided a contact email address and paid the appropriate application fee, the city engineer or designee shall notify the applicant by email within ten days of application submittal if the application is incomplete. The notice shall specify why he application is considered incomplete. If the city engineer or designee does not so notify applicant. the application shall be deemed complete. b) During review of a complete application, the city engineer or designee may reques applicant to provide additional information which is reasonably required to the extent permitted by law to determine the approvability of a permit in accordance with section 32- 1001:1:1 c) Within 90 days of submittal of a complete application the city engineer or designee shall. for each individual permit request included in an application: (i) approve the individual permi r (ii) deny the individual permit request in writing. including a written explanation of the reason[s] for denial. Except where the city and applicant have agreed upon an extension. any individual permit request not acted on within 90 days or such other period reauired by federal law shall be deemed ap rop ved. Sec. 32 -366. — Basis for denial. =kb�The city engineer shall deny a permit if: (4=a) The proposed wireless support structure or wireless facilities do not comply with applicable law and the terms of the wireless facilities franchise agreement; (2b) The proposed wireless support structure or wireless facilities have a negative aesthetic impact on the surrounding area, considering the size and design of the structure or facilities and the historic, residential, or commercial character of the surrounding area; (3c) The proposed wireless support structure or wireless facilities pose a risk to the public safety, including but not limited to public travel within the public way; (4d) The proposed wireless support structure or wireless facilities are inconsistent with the city's existing or planned public safety communications system; (6e) The proposed wireless support structure does not comply with the requirements of article IV of chapter 32; or (6f) Alternative, less impactful locations which reasonably meet the needs of the applicant are available for placement of the wireless facilities intended to be housed by the wireless support structure. Sec. 32 -367. — Notification of denial.