2010 Ordinances - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. A statement and strategy setting out the plans for securing all necessary property; 4. A detailed listing of all firms that will provide specific design, construction and completion guarantees and warranties, and a brief description of such guarantees and warranties; 5. A total life-cycle cost specifying methodology and assumptions of the project or projects and the proposed project start date. Include anticipated commitment of all parties; equity, debt, and other financing mechanisms; and a schedule of project revenues and project costs. The life-cycle cost analysis should include, but not be limited to, a detailed analysis of the projected return, rate of return, or both, expected useful life of facility, and estimated annual operating expenses; 6. A detailed discussion of assumptions about user fees or rates, and usage of the project or projects; 7. Identification of any known government support or opposition, or general public support or opposition for the project. Government or public support should be demonstrated through resolution of official bodies, minutes of meetings, letters, or other official communications; 8. Demonstration of consistency with appropriate local comprehensive or infrastructure development plans or indication of the steps required for acceptance into such plans; 9, Explanation of how the proposed project would impact local development plans of each affected jurisdiction; 10. Identification of the executive management and the officers and directors of the firm or firms submitting the proposal. In addition, identification of any known conflicts of interest or other disabilities that may impact the City's consideration of the proposal, including the identification of any persons known to the proposer who would be obligated to disqualify themselves from participation in any transaction arising from or in connection to the project pursuant to the Virginia State and Local Government Conflict of Interest Act, Chapter 31 (~ 2.2- 3100 et seq.) of Title 2.2; 11. Additional material and information as the City may reasonably request. 12. In the event that more than one proposal will be considered in the detailed phase of review, the City shall consider and make a decision as to whether the unsuccessful proposer should be reimbursed for costs incurred in the detailed phase of review. Such reasonable costs may be assessed to the successful proposer in the comprehensive agreement. Page 18 of 29