My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004 Ordinances
Portsmouth-City-Attorney
>
ORDINANCES
>
2004
>
2004 Ordinances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2009 3:38:59 PM
Creation date
2/2/2004 6:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ord/Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c. A landscape element that describes the potential measured <br /> for mitigation of the water quality and land impacts within <br /> CBPAs, Possible mitiganon measures include: <br /> <br /> i. Replanting schedule for trees and other significant <br /> vegetation removed for construction, in accordance <br /> with Section 36-52 of the Code. <br /> ii. Demonstration that the design of the plan will <br /> preserve to the greatest extent possible any <br /> significant trees and vegetation on the site and will <br /> provide maximum erosion control and overland <br /> flow benefits from such vegetation. <br /> iii. Demonstration that indigenous plants are to be used <br /> to the greatest extent possible. <br /> <br /> d. As part of any major water quality impact assessment <br /> submittal, the City Engineer may require review by the <br /> Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department (CBLAD). <br /> Upon receipt of a major water quality impact assessmem, <br /> the City Engineer will determine if such rewew is <br /> warranted and may request CBLAD to review the <br /> assessment and respond with written comments. Any <br /> comments by CBLAD will be incorporated into the final <br /> rewew by the City Engineer, provided that such commems <br /> are provided by CBLAD within 90 days of the request. <br /> <br /> (5) Evaluation Procedure. <br /> <br /> a. Upon the completed review of a minor water quality impact <br /> assessment, the City Engineer will determine if the <br /> following criteria have been satisfied: <br /> <br /> i. The proposed encroachment is necessary due to the <br /> inability to place improvements elsewhere on the <br /> site to avoid disturbance of the buffer area; <br /> ii. Impervious surface is minimized; <br /> iii. Proposed best management practices, where <br /> required, achieve the mqnisite reductions in <br /> pollutant loadings; <br /> iv. Proposed mitigation measures, including the <br /> revegetation plan and site design, result in minimal <br /> disturbance to all components of the RPA, including <br /> the 100-foot buffer area; and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.