Laserfiche WebLink
(b) <br /> <br />the inability to place improvements elsewhere <br />on the site to avoid disturbance of the <br />buffer area; <br /> <br />ii. Impervious surface is minimized; <br /> <br />iii. <br /> <br />Proposed best management practices, where <br />required, achieve the requisite reductions in <br />pollutant loadings; <br /> <br />iv. The development, as proposed, meets the <br /> purpose and intent of this Chapter; <br /> <br />Upon the completed review of a major water quality <br />impact assessment, the City Engineer will <br />determine if the proposed development is <br />consistent with the purpose and intent of this <br />Chapter and that the following criteria have been <br />satsfied: <br /> <br />Within any RPA~ the proposed development is <br />water-dependent; <br /> <br />ii. The disturbance of any wetlands will be <br /> minimized; <br /> <br />iii. <br /> <br />Proposed erosion and sediment control <br />concepts are adequate to achieve the <br />reductions in runoff and prevent off-site <br />sedimentation; <br /> <br />iv. <br /> <br />Proposed stormwater management concepts are <br />adequate to: control the stormwater runoff to <br />achieve the'required performance standard for <br />pollutant control; <br /> <br />Proposed revegetation of disturbed areas will <br />provide optimum erosion and sediment control <br />benefits; <br /> <br />vi. The design and location of any proposed <br /> drainfield will be in accordance with the <br /> requirements of Section 9.1-10. <br /> <br />vii. The development, as proposed, is consistent <br /> with the purpose and intent of this Chapter; <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />