|
April 23~ 1979
<br />
<br />At a Publi~ Hearing meeting of City Council held on April 23, 1979, there were present:
<br />
<br />Jack P. B~rnes, E. Saunders Early, Jr., J. Robert Gray, James W. Holley,
<br />Edward'L. Oas.t, Jr., C. H. McGinnis, Assistant City Manager, James T. Martin,
<br />Assistan.t City Attorney.
<br />
<br />Absent: Richard J. Davis, Archie Blliott, Jr.
<br />
<br />Vice Mayor Holley presided in the absence of Mayor Davis.
<br />
<br /> 79-135 - Public Hearing on rezoning petitions, use permit applications and a proposed
<br />amendment to the Zoning Ordince:
<br />
<br />(a) Zoning Petition Z 79-1 Petition of Ruby H. Wright, Owner.
<br />
<br />Ms, Wright presented plans of the proposed laundromat facility.
<br />
<br /> On motion:of Mr Gray and seconded by Mr, Early, to con~rin the recommendation of the
<br />planning CommissiOn, the. fg!lowing ordin~nce,w~S ap~O~e~!~On firs~ r~a~ng; and by Unani. mous v(
<br />
<br />"ZONING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z 79-1"
<br />
<br />(b) Zoning Petition Z 79-2 - Petition of Deborah A. King, Owner.
<br />
<br />John S. Joannou, Attorney, spoke for the petitioner.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Barnes, te concur in the recommendation o£ the
<br />Planning Commission, the following ordinance was approved on first reading, a~d~b~ unanimous vo
<br />
<br />"ZONING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z 79-2"
<br />
<br /> (C) Z0ning Petition Z
<br />Agent.
<br />
<br />79-4 - Petition of C. L.
<br />
<br />and Edna L. Parker,
<br />
<br />by Carl J. Pieroni
<br />
<br /> Robert S. Babb, Attorney for the petitioner, requested continuance of ~i:~Z9-4 until
<br />Public Hearing of August, 1979, and if not, would request to withdraw application.
<br />
<br />The following citizens spoke against the petition:
<br />
<br />Ms. Ann Tonning, 3044 Bomar Drive, Chesapeake, President of Dunedin Civic League, spoke
<br />against the bowling alley, and presented petition previously presented to Chesapeake City
<br />James Cerza, 3604 Forest Haven La., representing residents of Forest Haven Lane, requested
<br />that the petition and continuance be denied.
<br />Alfred R. Lee, 3612 Forest Haven Lane, spoke against the bowling alley.
<br />Ms. Nina McConnell, 3605 Forest Haven Lane, spoke against the petition, stating that
<br />a bowling alley would draw undesirables and property in the area would decline in value.
<br />Joe N. Moore, 3601 Forest Haven Lane, Chesapeake, representing neighbors of Laurel Park,
<br />requested denial of the peiiiion.
<br />Ms~. Shirley Hollister, 3613 Forest Haven Lane, spoke against the petition.
<br />Ms. Peggy Lilienthal, 3616 Forest Haven Lane, spoke in opposition.
<br />John Doyle, 3621 Forest Haven Lane, requested denial.
<br />
<br />Mr. Babb requested to withdraw the petition.
<br />
<br /> Motion of~r. Early and seconded by Mr. Barnes, to concur with Mr. Babb's request, that
<br />the petition ~be withdrawn, and was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Early, Gray, Holley, Oas~
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> (d) Zoning Petition l 79-6 Petition of Associated Church'land Investors, by Joseph
<br />Preziotti, Jr., Planning Consultant of Baldwin & Gregg, Ltd.
<br />
<br /> Joseph Preziotti, Jr., ~epresenting Batdwin & Gregg, Ltd., spoke for the petitioner, and
<br />presented the following proffer:
<br />
<br /> '!Subject Property:. Beginning at the:northeast ~oyn?~of the intersecti&n Of River Shore
<br />R~ad an~ Parish Lane; ~hence 40g~82' north~ia~g th~?ea~t ri~htro~-w~ of Ri~ Shore Road:
<br />thence northea's~, RS~18 ;~ ihence ~sou.theast~pp~okim~tel~7!~5 ~o the~'R ~5 zoning dis'trict line;
<br />thenc~ ~outh along said line approximately 375' to a rear lot line; thence northwest 173.15';
<br />thence southwest 314.50' to River Shore Road; thence northwest 170' to the point of origin.
<br />
<br /> We hereby proffer that the development of Lots 188-19S, inclusive and Lots 210-214, in-
<br />clusive, Plat of Southampton, Section 2, M.B. 10,_ P. 67, shall be in accordance with the con-
<br />ditions hereinafter set forth unless an amendment is mutually agreed upon by the City Council
<br />and the record owners:
<br />
<br />1. The zoning of the subject property as described above should be changed from
<br /> Residential R-150 to Residential R-75 Conditional.
<br />
<br />The use of the aforementioned lots shall be limited to single and two family dwellings,
<br />including appropiate accessory uses as permitted in Section 40-7S of the zoning ordi-
<br />nance, pertaining to residential uses.
<br />
<br />re."
<br />
<br />to:
<br />
<br />:ouncil.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|