Laserfiche WebLink
212 <br /> <br />February l0s 1981 <br /> <br /> Mrs. Freddie Molle~n, 4603 Westmoreland Terrace, representing Central Mid-City Civic <br />League and Simonsdale Civic League, spoke in opposition. <br /> <br />Clifton C. Molleen, 46~3 Westmoreland Terrace, relinquished his t&me to Mrs. Molleen. <br /> <br /> S. L. Whitehead, 4415 County Street, representing Mid-City Civic League, spoke in <br />opposition. <br /> <br />Marie Whitfield, 40t0 Clifford Street, relinquished her~time ~o Mr. Whitehead. <br /> <br /> Frank H. Wright, 1518 Augusta Avenue, speaking for self, spoke incopposition: of sub- <br />§idized housing in the Westhaven & Simonsdale areas. <br /> <br /> Robert E. Perkins, 406 Westmoreland Avenue, representing Central Mid-City Civic League <br />and Simonsdale Civic League, spoke in opposition. <br /> <br /> Mrs. Velma Topping, 4618 South_Street, representing Central Mid-City Civic League, <br />spoke in opposition. <br /> <br /> Mrs. Rose E. Perkins, 406 Westmoreland Avenue, represent~Central Mid-City Civic League <br />and Simonsdale Civic League, spoke against subsidized housing in Westhaven and Simonsdale <br />and had petitions signed by almost 5,000 residents of dommunities of Simonsdale and Westhaven <br />and surrounding areas. (The petitions were not received by_the City Clerk, but received by <br />mail on the 12th of February.) <br /> <br /> Joseph E. Knight, 4820 Portsmouth Boulevard, representing Simonsdale Civic Club, spoke <br />in opposition. <br /> <br /> Rem. Don Sheffield, Chairman of the BoArd of Directors, The Emily Green Home, made the <br />~following presentation: <br /> <br /> "At the regular monthly meeting of the Board of Directors for the Emily Green Home, whic~ <br />was held Monday night, February 9, matters relating to the 56 apartment units on King and Pow- <br />hatan Streets being converted into subsidized housing units were discussed. The Board of <br />Directors asked me ~o present a letter to you stating their opposition to this change and thei <br />reasons for it. <br /> <br /> The Emily Green Home is owned and operated by the Portsmouth Baptist Association which is <br />comprised of 28 churches with an aggregate membership of nearly 20,000. The Home provides a <br />place for o.lder citizens who, for one reason or another, need and want what is offered there. <br /> <br /> Our opposition ~o changing these apartments into subsidized housing units is because of <br />the following reasons: <br /> <br />The strong possibility that there could be people placed in these units who have <br />little or no regard for other people or their proper~y is a matter of great zoncern. <br />It has happened before that because of these same ccnditi~ns~cpeople have suffered <br />financial loss in the devaluation of their property, and some eventually had to move <br />in order to find a place that offered some semblance of peace and security. The 80 <br />residents of the Emily Green Home are older citizens who enjoy the freedom of being <br />able to get out for a walk in the community. With the possibility of trouble-makers <br />moving into subsidized housing units adjacent to the home, steps will have to be <br />taken by the administrator and the Board of Directors to provide protection, even if <br />it means curtailing outside activities. <br /> <br />As Chairman of the Board of Directors, I attended the meeting which was held in the <br />Westhaven Elementary School on Saturday afternoon, January 31. I spoke on behalf of <br />the Board about ~hese matters which disturb us. The only response came from one <br />man representing the city, Chet McGinnis, who implied that we were over estimating <br />the potential problems. My reaction to this response was that it was his feelings <br />over against the feelings of some 1S00 people who attended the meeting at Willett <br />Auditorium, the residents of Cavalier Manor, and over 400 people who were in attendan~ <br />at that Saturday afternoon meeting. It was a reflection agains~ the integrity of the~ <br />concerned citizens of our city. <br /> <br />We are also concerned about the water behind the Emily Green Home. Who is going to <br />be responsible for the little children, who could become residents of the subsidized <br />housing units if they were to wander out into the water and d~own? Will the city, o~ <br />HUD, accept t~e responsibility and consequences if something like this should happen? <br /> <br /> We are a~ a loss for an answer~when it comes to the question as to why steps were taken <br />to have this property earmarked for subsidized housing units, and we were no~ contacted and <br />given an opportunity to talk with the persons responsible~for this action. Responsible city <br />leadership calls for a close and working relationship with the residents of the community. <br />The way this was handled leads us to wonder if the persons responsible for this action either <br />did not know the fair and proFer procedure, or that they knew it, and did not wanz to become <br />involved in any dialogue with the residents of the community. <br /> <br /> We are exgremely fortunate to have a very capable and qualified administrator for the <br />home, Mrs. Ruth B. Hudgins, w~, with the assistance of a very fine staff, is committed to <br />riding the best of care and protection for the residents of the home. The Board is most <br />appreciative of their efforts. We don't wan~ to see anything happen that will change the <br />complexion of the area surrounding this home whereby it would become a sore eye and a~isk, <br />rather than a pleasure, to live there. <br /> <br />pro <br /> <br /> <br />