Laserfiche WebLink
220 <br /> <br />August 28, 1984 <br /> <br />tentional fraud and carries with it an additional penalty of 100% of unpaid taxes. <br /> In order to assure compliance with the recent amendments to the State Code, the City <br />A~to~neyyhas a revised Division 2 of Article IV of Chapter 35 pertaining to same. I, there- <br />fore, recommend that Council adopt the attached Ordinance pertinent to special assessments <br />for open space real estate. <br /> On motion of Mrs. Lucas and seconded by Mrs. Webb, the following ordinance was approved <br />on first reading, and was adopted by unanimous vote: <br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1975, BY <br /> AMENDING ARTICLE IV, DIVISION 2, OF CHAPTER 55 THEREOF, PERTAINING TO SPECIAL <br /> ASSESSMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE REAL ESTATE." <br /> <br /> 84-506 Letter from the City Manager recommending adoption of an ordinance to amend <br />Chapter 23 of the Code of the Cit) of Portsmouth, Virginia, 1973, by repealing Section 25-497 <br />pertaining to mall and mall transit streets. <br /> <br /> 'In carrying out its function of regulating traffic pursuant to the police powers of the <br />City, and in order to assure the safety of pedestrian traffic, the Council of the City of <br />Portsmouth has previously adopted an Article of the City Code providing lot mall and mall <br />transit streets. MalI streets are maintained by the City as public rights-of-way; but ~rohibi <br />the operation or parking of any vehicle including, but not limited to, automobiles, tru~ks, <br />motorcycles, and bicycles on such streets other than those who have specified reasons as pro- <br />vided for in the City Code such as emergency vehicles, construction vehicles and equipment, <br />and vehicles delivering to commercial stores with merchandise for sale. Mall transit streets <br />are identicaL~xcept lot the fact that they permit transit vehicles (trolleys[ operated under <br />a franchise granted by the City Council. In the City of Portsmouth the area constituting the <br />Middle Street Mall qualifies as a mall street, while Harbor Street adjacent to Portside <br />qualifies as a mall transit street. <br /> <br /> Section 28-497 of the City Code provides for violations of the prohibitions relative to <br /> mall and mall transit streets; however, such penalty exceeds that provided for other traffic <br /> violations. <br /> <br /> Accordingly, in order to conform the penalty for viol~ation of traffic offenses pertainin <br />to mall and mall ~ransit streets with those provided for other traffic offenses, the City <br />Attorney has recommended that 923-497 be repealed. The ~pealing of said section will leave <br />violations of she mall and mall transit street ordinance ccnstituting a traffic infraction <br />which is punishable by a fine of not more than $100.00. I, therefore, recommend adoption of <br />the enclosed ordinance." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Beamer and seconded by Mr. Gray, the following ordinance was adopted <br />on first and final reading, and by the following vote: <br /> <br />'AN CRDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 23 OF TH~ COD~ OF PHE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, <br />VIRGINIA, 1973, BY REPEALING SECTION 23-497, PERTAINING TO MALL AND MALL <br />TKANSIT STR~TS." <br /> <br />Ayes: Beamer, CorF~ew, Gray, Lucas, Webb, Whitlow, Holley <br />Nays: Ncne <br /> <br /> 84-307 Letter from the City Manager recommending denial of an ordinance to close a <br />portion of R~ven Street. <br /> <br /> "Messrs. A1 Dumire and Charles Satterfield, Jr., by Darell Sayer, Attorney, have made <br /> <br />application to close a portion of Raven <br /> <br /> As required by law, the applicants <br />viewers were appointed by Council. The <br />and Planning staff recommend closure of <br />remain open for pedestrian ~raffic. <br /> <br />Street from Greenwood Drive to Barclay Avenue. <br /> <br />have given the appropriate no~ice of application and <br />viewers recommend closure. The Planning Commission <br />all but five (5') feet of the right-of-way which would <br /> <br /> The estimated~cost for building the pedestrian walkway ms $3,000. <br />to check with his client to determine if he was willing to pay for ~he <br />ed by the Planning Commission and the response was in the negative. <br /> <br />I requested Mr. Sayer <br />improvements recommend- <br /> <br /> Because such improvements are no~ budgeted <br />in making said improvements, I would therefore, <br />be denied." <br /> <br />for, and <br />recommend <br /> <br />the ~r~perty owner is not interested <br />that the recuest for street closure <br /> <br /> Darell Sayer, Attorney, 451 Court Street, representing Albert Dumire, property owner, <br />~'poke in support of closing the street. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Beamer ~o concur with the City Manager's recommendation, died due to the <br />lack of a seconded. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Webb, that the matter <br />Manager has an opportunity to look into the situation and a report <br />adopted by unanimous vote. <br /> <br />be tabled until the City <br />be furnished, and was <br /> <br /> <br />