Laserfiche WebLink
April 28, 2020 <br /> <br />The following comments were submitted by citizens for the April 28, 2020 Virtual City <br />Council meeting: <br /> <br />20-107 (a) <br /> Public hearing to consider the Annual Operating Budget for FY2021. <br />1) As a citizen of Portsmouth and an public education advocate, I would like to thank <br />all of you for considering and adopting a proposed budget that includes an increase <br />in funding for Portsmouth's school system. This investment is critical to the success <br />of this city as a whole. Education is the foundation for building and growing our <br />hometown and we need to keep that foundation as strong as possible. I do have a <br />concern that is rooted in the funding structure that has allowed for this increase. <br />As an individual, paying a higher meal tax to fund our schools is something that I <br />would not think twice about. However, our restaurant owners and large number of <br />citizens are not happy with this as it means more money coming out of the citizens' <br />pockets and a potential loss of revenue for the restaurants. I would like to know is <br />there any other way that the budget can be reworked that the impact on the citizens <br />is lessened but the overall goal of increasing funding for our schools is still <br />achieved. Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my comments. <br />Sergio Neal <br />1560 Darren Cir, Portsmouth, Va 23701, 757-553-6712 <br />2) As stated in my video critique of the agenda for this virtual meeting, I do not <br />consider action on any of the 20-107 budgetary items as conforming to the <br />guidance provided by Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring in his letter to <br />Delegate Sullivan. (See https://oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2020/Sullivan- <br />Opinion-Request.pdf.) At the core of the matter is this essential precept: "\[P\]ublic <br />bodies should carefully consider whether taking a given action during a meeting <br />held by electronic communication means is truly essential and should defer any <br />and all decisions that can be deferred until it is once again possible to meet in <br />person." \[emphasis is mine\] Regarding budgetary matters for the upcoming fiscal <br />year, council could delay adoption until the final second of June 30, 2020, and not <br />run afoul of state code. Although that would be cutting it closer than any of us <br />would prefer, you could reasonably run the process up to the last regular meeting <br />in June without doing undue harm to the city and its citizens. <br />Furthermore, receiving public testimony on the city manager's budget as presented <br />on March 24, 2020, is a waste of everyone's time. Although Dr. Patton gave the <br />presentation in good faith, within days of its airing, the world turned upside down <br />because of the corona virus pandemic. Nothing within the power of any individual <br />or group will offset the economic disruptions already experienced in this crisis, to <br />say nothing of those that lie ahead. Consequently, all the revenue assumptions <br />contained in that budget document are significantly overstated. As the City of <br />Portsmouth, unlike the federal government, cannot print and circulate more money <br />to offset its income shortfalls, the expenditure side of the budget will have to be <br />adjusted correspondingly. <br />To keep faith with the citizenry, then, a new budget that accounts for the <br />dramatically altered global economic landscape needs to be formulated, discussed <br />with council in recorded work sessions, and provided for citizen input through a <br />public hearing process. Although the first regular council meeting in June is <br />scheduled for the 8th, two days before the Governor's shelter-in-place order is due <br />to expire, a special budget hearing could be set for the following Tuesday. If social <br />distancing remains in force, the venue could be a high school auditorium rather <br />than the council chamber itself. The focus of council should be on getting a realistic <br />budget in place on time without shortchanging the public's entitlement to <br />meaningful participation in the process. What you contemplate doing tomorrow <br />evening does not come anywhere near meeting that standard. Consequently, I <br />request that you drop items 20-107 (a), (b), and (c) from the April 28 agenda and <br />reschedule them once a new budget package has been presented and discussed <br />adequately by council. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />