My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 12/09/1986
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980s
>
Year 1986
>
Minutes 12/09/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2001 4:12:14 PM
Creation date
8/22/2001 4:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
12/9/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
139 <br /> <br />December 9, 1986 <br /> <br />of the cable television system within the City of Portsmouth will <br />;ontinue in accordance with the Franchise Agreement and the provis <br />~f Chapter 6-1/2 of the Code of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, <br />1973, as amended, to the extent allowable under federal and state <br />law; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Portsmouth Cable Television Commission has considc <br />ed the reques~ and recommended that Council approve such tr~nsactio~ <br />as being in the best interest of the citizens of Portsmouth; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the <br />Portsmouth Cable <br />proposed transactJ <br />City. <br /> <br /> NOW, THER~FOt <br />Portsmouth hereby <br />the Portsmouth Cat <br />Inc. to Cox Cable <br />is expressly unde~ <br />or the management <br />system within the <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br /> 86-458 Let <br />a motion authoriz] <br />Master Developmen~ <br />revising the term~ <br /> <br /> 'City staff <br />staff have haJ ext <br />Development Corpo~ <br />Schedule for the <br />a timetable that <br /> <br /> I recommend <br />execute the contre <br />extending the <br />1986, with constr~ <br /> <br />Council concurs in the recommendation of the <br />elevision CommissiDn that the approval of the <br />on is in the best interest of the citizens of the <br /> <br />E, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of <br />consents to the transfer of the assets, including <br />le Television Franchise, from Cox Cable Portsmoutt <br />Hampton Roads, Inc. In granting this consent, it <br />stood that there will be no change in the franchi~ <br />and continued opera~ion of the cable television <br />City of Portsmouth." <br /> <br />arnes, Corprew, Gray, Lucas, SimFson, Webb, Holle <br />one <br /> <br />er from the City Manager recommending adoption of <br />ng the City Manager to execute an amendment with <br /> Corporation establishing a new closing date and <br /> and conditions. <br /> <br />nd Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Authority <br />ensive discussions with representatives of Master <br />ation concerning a proposed amended Project <br />ings Crossing project. The agreement would allow <br />s acceptable no all parties. <br /> <br />hat City Council adopt a motion authorizing me to <br />ct amendment on behalf of the City of Portsmuth, <br />ing date from September 30, 1986, to December 15, <br />ction to begin by December 31, 1986." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Simpson, that authori <br />zation be granted to amend the agreement extendihg to March 31, 198 <br />and construction begin by May 1, i987, as requested, and was adopte <br />by unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> 86-459 Letter from the City Manager recommending adoption of <br />a moticn authorizing the City Manager to execute_an amendment to <br />the Development Agreement for the Truxtun School and adjoining pro- <br />perty establishing a new closing date. <br /> <br /> "As you are aware, the City Council and the Portsmouth Redevel <br />opment and Housing Authority have been supportive of the proposed <br />renovation of the Truxtun School site and the development of a <br />residential complex on the adjacent property. Recently, represent- <br />atives of the developer submitted plans for both parcels to the <br />appropriate city officials for their review. Although these plans <br />did not meet the requirments of the applicable City Code sections, <br />they do represent a level of detail that would appear to indicate <br />the developer's intention to bring the project to fruition. <br /> <br /> It would be to the mutual interest iof all concerned if an <br />extension to the closing date, as permitited in the above reference~ <br />development agreement, were grante~. Inl granting the extension, <br />additional time will be available for re'view and detailing Of the <br />plan which should be beneficial for a more desirable project. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.