Laserfiche WebLink
444 <br /> <br />M~a.y 2, 1989 <br /> <br /> School Board Request <br /> The School Board has proposed a budget of $74,960,514 <br />which represents an increase of 8.59% over the present year in <br />local funding. Even though their budget proposal during other <br />times would be considered reasonable, it is necessary for me to <br />recommend less funding because of the difficult budgetary <br />constraints. 7-1 aR, the~efor~,i-~eeommend~ing an appropriation to <br />the School-Moard~o~ $73,960,~l'4..~hidh r~presents a~.32%~loca'I <br />increase. ~ . ~ ~ ~ <br /> <br /> The funding level that I h~ve reco~ehded wil~ provide,~.the <br />following: ~ -' :~' ~ ~ <br /> <br /> ~ ~ Full funding/for a mandated 7.30% salary increaseJfor <br /> '' ~ll.-teac~e~ types. ~ -.~ ..'~' ' <br /> o Full fund.in0:for the 19 new guidance couns;elorc <br /> 'posi%ions'.mandated by the State. <br /> o F~ndin~ for:.an.increase of 4.05% in all other:items.in <br /> the,'Schoo~B~d~.et. <br /> <br /> I wish to point out that the funding that I am <br /> rec6mmending"(.4~3B% increase in local funds and 6.52% overall) <br /> greatly exceeds'the increase I have recommended for:.general <br /> government'operations.(3.00%). Consequently, I feel.that an <br /> equitablez:balanee'..is achieved at. thislfunding level,with <br /> respect.to'education, municipal services, and the~proposed rate <br /> increases~: <br /> <br /> I have met with'the Superintendent of Schools..and have. <br /> agreed to recommend'the re-appropriation of any funds that they <br /> might--be able. to save fro this year's operations, : The.- <br /> Superintendent has agreed to provide me with an estimate,~of <br /> this amouRt in:the nea~ future. If this possibility <br /> materializes, I will amend my budget recommendation <br /> accordihgly. <br /> <br /> Reorganizations .- _ <br /> Over the cour*~e of the year, t have taken advantage of <br /> position vacancies from department heads to hourly employees to <br /> determine where duties could be absorbed'or eliminated in an <br /> effort to~streamlin~ operations amd/or reduce personnel costs. <br /> The following represents some of the major organizationa~ .... <br /> changes lmplementediover the courselof the last 12 months: <br /> <br /> 0 Public Works Elimination of City Engineer~' <br /> Grade 34 <br /> <br /> · o Economic' Development - Elimination of Central Business <br /> District Coordinator Grade 24 <br /> o Management Services - Elimination of Grants Accountant <br /> position G~ade 22 <br /> <br /> Elimi'nating the City Engineer position ~as possible when <br /> the incumbent was promoted to assume the position of Pub~lic <br /> Works Dire'ctor and the d~vision of~'that department into other <br /> operations -- General Services and Environmental Services. The <br /> other two positions are directly related to the transfer of the <br /> Grants Of~fice ~rom Environmenta'l ~Services to Management <br /> Services. ~As you recall, with the reduction of Federal <br /> Community DevelOpment Block Grant (CDBG) funds, City Council <br /> directed me to earmark ~all future funding for housing and <br /> redevelopment e~ffor~s- Consequently, approximatelM~ $4Q0,000 in <br /> City operations we're transferred from federally funded CDBG <br /> funds to the locally funded General Fund (urants and. Cod <br /> Enforcement)~ Because of ~the. fiscal impact o~n the~opemating <br /> budget and my de~is~ion to reduce positions, I am required to <br /> depend on the Executive Director of, th~ Portsmoutk <br /> Redevelopment and Housing Authority (PRHA) and his staff to a <br /> greater degree to monitor CD and housing programs. <br /> <br /> <br />