Laserfiche WebLink
<br />March 20. 2007 <br /> <br />The benefits are not only unequal; the backend costs of each system are different. <br />For instance, this budget recommends $1.1 million in new funds for the old, closed <br />system to keep it financial sound, whereas the VRS system requires less than $500,000 <br />for more than six times the number of employees. <br /> <br />The point of these comments is to suggest there are deeper facts to be understood <br />about the City's compensation system, and how its costs are distributed. On balance, <br />we have attempted to find a middle ground with our recommendations but I do want <br />Council and the public to realize any funding enlarges or creates new gaps. Until the <br />City completely works its way out of the closed system City Council and citizen <br />taxpayers face the costly and continual dilemma. <br /> <br />Tax and Other Fiscal Adiustments <br /> <br />Real estate tax <br /> <br />This section of our budget is also challenging. <br />On the one hand, City Council's Vision Statement states the goal that Portsmouth is to <br />have one of the region's lowest tax rates by 2025, it is also recognized that today the <br />city is behind in many basic services and facilities and also has the region's highest <br />percent of tax exempt properties. Nevertheless, I am recommending a 16 cent <br />reduction over the next three budget years as follows: 8 cent reduction in FY08, 5 cent <br />reduction in FY09 and 3 cent reduction in FY10. These reductions will eventually bring <br />the tax rate from the current $1.36 to $1.20. For FY08, the recommendation is a <br />reduction from $1.36 to $1.28. One penny on the tax rate generates approximately <br />$626,000 in this proposed budget. <br /> <br />If City Council adopts this proposed budget with an 8-cent tax rate reduction, the <br />average resident will experience a $17 per month increase in their tax bill or $203 per <br />year. <br /> <br />Boat tax <br /> <br />Part of the recommendations to reduce the real estate tax rate in this year's proposed <br />budget include efforts to diversify and improve the equity of the city's taxes in other <br />areas. This budget specifically proposes that one cent on the real estate tax rate can <br />be reduced if the City Council approves a boat tax rate of one dollar ($1.00) per one <br />hundred dollars assessed value. This recommendation follows discussions with the <br />Municipal Finance Commission and several City Council budget work sessions. <br /> <br />There are numerous services the City provides to local marinas and boat owners. Two <br />specific examples relate to fire and police services. In 2006, the Fire Department <br />responded to 57 calls at estimated cost of $84,000. In 2005 and 2006, the Police <br />Department answered 616 calls to marinas and boats. <br /> <br />HR Median Home Values <br /> <br />It is the combination of the tax rate and the assessment that creates the tax bill. While <br />our community has experienced relatively high increases in assessments in the past <br />two years, the City Assessor estimates our city is at 87 -percent of market value. Other <br />cities, such as nearby Chesapeake and Hampton achieve assessments close to the <br />state constitutional requirement of 100 percent. Assessments are another area where <br />our city has lagged or deferred its catch-up. Despite Portsmouth's high nominal rate <br />and low actual assessment, the city's total tax bills continue to trail our neighbor <br />communities. In January, The Virginian-Pilot published a table showing the median <br />value of homes in the five South Hampton Roads cities. <br /> <br />The table shows that the owner of a median value home in Portsmouth actually is <br />paying less in real estate taxes than the owner of median homes in the other four <br />Hampton Roads cities. <br />