Laserfiche WebLink
J~ly 29th~ 1919 <br /> <br /> ask~_~g for an <br />in face of their ~ increase in rates, is a matter tD~t I deem should ce considered <br />carefully and in my opinion, I question the City's authority in so far as compelling them to <br />meet their demands. We unquestionably have the right to demand service to the public in gen- <br />era!. <br /> "~o~s very truly, <br /> <br />"Vi. Bo Bates, City ~ganager.'~ <br /> <br /> On motion, the two con~munieations were referred to the Department of t~3.b!ie Safety to <br />consult with the Cit~ I¢~n~ger and City Attorney as to the ~tter. <br /> The ~oecial Water Co~ittee reported "Progress" on the matter of contract for supply~ <br />the City o~ S-~folk with water. <br /> The said Co~t~e reco~gnded~ the adoption of a contract between the Gover~ent and City <br />with the Atlantic Coast Line Ryl Co. for usi~ ~t~ r~il~ay r~ight of way ne~ S~fo~ for the <br />~0" wood pi~ at $50. ~r a~, as ~r the request of t~ Superintendent of the Water Depart- <br />merit t~ref~. <br /> O~ motion, t~ contra~t was adopted and the proper City Officials ~nstructed to sign <br /> <br /> The Department of Ft~ce reported ~o~e~s" on the proposed ~crease of salaries a~ <br />wages of City e~oloyees. <br /> <br />motion, adjo~_~ned. <br /> <br />August t2th, 1919 <br /> <br />At a regular meeting of th~ City Co~u~cil August 12th there were preseD, t: <br /> <br />Messrs-- T~ A. Bu.utir~, Mo P. Claud, V;. H. C~.lpepper, <br /> EC~D. Deans, J. T. Hanvey, C. H. Herbert, <br /> . k. Wright, 7. <br /> <br /> The minutes of the~egular meetim~ July 15th and special meetings July lSth and <br />were read and were approved. ~ <br /> <br />July 29th <br /> <br />REPORTS OP DEPARTMENTS <br /> <br />La~~t <br /> <br />No report <br /> <br /> Public Service~- <br /> Presented the following.ordinance, which, ~der the rules, was ordered <br />to lie on the table until the next regular imee$m~ of the body, and was referred to the Depart- <br />ment of Law and City Attorney: <br /> An Ordinance to Estao_msh and Define Buildir~ Lines According <br />to Deeds of Conveyance, and Upon Petition of Property Owners, and Defining the Duty of the City <br />Engineer in Reference Thereto and Penalty for Violation Thereof. <br /> <br /> Pending the adoption of the above ordinance, the Department recommended the adoption of <br />the following resolution; and the resolution wa~ adopted: <br /> "P~SOLVED, That the City Manager and <br />the City-Engineer be and a~e hereby instructed not to give building, linas in Port Norfolk where <br />the deed places such building line back from the st~ee~ line, except toconform with the pro- <br />visions of the deed." <br /> <br />Pmbli~ Prope~ty-- <br /> No report. <br /> <br /> Public Safety-- <br /> Recommended that the ~Ehm~e Way be pl ced on Crawford street, f~om London <br />~to South streets, and that appr'o~n~iation for same be refe_~r'ed tO the Finance Department. <br /> <br /> On motion, the recommendation was adopted. <br /> <br /> The Deoartment oFferea the followmng resolutmon wm~h reg~ard t~o th proposed increase in <br />rates by The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., which was amop~e~. <br /> -- "~R~REAS, T~e rates of <br />phone service have been lately increased in this City .i~ amouuts ranging from .~ to iG~ and <br /> "WHEREAS, ~he service given th_Is City by The ~Chesapeake -& Potomac Telephone Co. has not <br />been nor is it now sat~sfactor., and <br /> <br /> "WHEREAS, The. _ T~lephone_ _ _~ Company has been petitioned to appoint a local manager for Ports- <br /> <br /> <br />