Laserfiche WebLink
051 <br /> March 28,1995 <br /> <br /> ~ctions, not transcend adversity. The actions taken <br />over the last five years have been difficult, but absolutely <br />necessary to reposition our city through its municipal <br />organization into a more efficient entity. The proposed FY 96 <br />General Fund Operating Budget of approximately $120 million that <br />I submit to you today represents a 1.2% increase over the prior <br />year'sbudget of approximately $118 million, Factoring out <br />increases recommended in public safety, debt service transfers, <br />and refuse collection, the FY 96 proposed budget represents a <br />1/2% decrease over FY 95. Of fifty-six (56) general fund cost <br />centers, tWenty-seven (27) show a reductiOn in PrOPosed <br />expenditures below FY 95, with seventeen (17) of those having <br />been reduced 5% or more. In addition, the FY 96 proposed budget <br />includes a net decrease of eleven (11) positions for all funds, <br />despite forty-six (46) new public safety positions. <br /> <br /> Your leadership has made our gradual improvement possible, <br />but our work is not yet finished, You have demonstrated your <br />willingness to boldly move forward. This budget, again, <br />requires that same willingness to risk the unpopular by <br />supporting and authorizing needed actions which will enable our <br />city to meet its challenges in a fashion which will last for <br />many years. <br /> <br /> We remain focused on right-sizing the municipal <br />organization. Our work force management and reduction efforts, <br />along with customer service improvement, will continue. <br />Consolidation efforts must diligently move forward and demand <br />that we set aside organizational self-interest. These efforts <br />are a part of a long-term process requiring citizen and <br />leadership support coupled with management determination. <br /> <br /> We must commit to do that which is necessary to make our <br />city and iits citizens safe. As I have stated publicly many <br />times before, I am not a subscriber to the notion that more <br />police officers are the solution to our city's, or America's <br />crime problem. We do, however, need to add resources and work <br />those resources differently and smarter. At the same time, we <br />must continue the leisure, community, educational, and social <br />~ervice programs which hold the keys to solving our crime <br />problem. <br /> <br /> We have realized much success in economic development, and <br />I applaud the efforts of our staff and those of the Portsmouth <br />Redevelopment and Housing Authority, as well as their respective <br />Commissioners. To Continue this success, a focused strategy <br />must be d~ve~oped to attract new retail ventures while <br />retaining, enabling, and nurturing our existing retail <br />businesses. Retail development is vital to the economic rebirth <br />of Portsmouth. General sales tax revenues over the last ten <br />years have continued to decline, diminishing a major revenue <br />source. With these factors in mind, efforts are currently <br />underway to recruit a retail specialist to carry out this <br />strategy. <br /> <br /> Equally as important as public safety, crime prevention, <br />and economic development, the budget must address our code <br />enforcement problem. While code compliance often leaves much to <br />be desired, I also realize that our efforts are not meeting your <br />expectations. We must work for needed legislative change for <br />stricter laws and realize that the expansion of our staff <br />resource base will not give us what we need as a city, if we do <br />not work harder and more resourcefully in partnership with our <br />citizens. <br /> <br /> <br />