Laserfiche WebLink
Interest ........ ' .... ..... ...... ........... ........... 6'aOa <br />Amortization .... ' ......... .--.' ....................... ~ ?~a <br />Depreciation .............. - .................................. 50,000. <br /> ....................................................... '~0~000. <br />Tots~. <br /> ................................ ~465,730. <br /> On motion o£ Mr. White, the Ferry Budget Ordinance was adopted, and by the followingv. ote.' <br /> <br /> Ayes-- Brooks, Maupin, Mayo, Oast, Stewart, White, 6. <br /> <br />January <br /> <br />present: <br /> <br />At~a regular meeting of the City Council held January 8th,at 8 p. m.,there were <br /> <br /> Messrs-- Vernon Brooks, J. C. Dunford, E.W.~Maupin, Jr., <br /> J. Alden Oast, L. G, White, <br /> Also the City Manager. <br /> <br /> The minutes of the postponed regular meeting December 2~th were read.and were approved. <br /> <br /> The following communication from the CityManager~ which had~been laid on the table until <br />this me,Zing, was taken up and read: <br /> "Attached you will find statement of facts in reference <br />to petition of Annie Kline for relief of interest and penalties on 1926 and 1~2~ taxes on <br />p~operty assessed .as lot 16 block 13, ~12 Lincoln <br />Barclay. <br /> <br /> I have been informed at the tax office that proper notice had been given in regard to this <br />tax both through the mail, and in person. I also know it to be a fact that during the.many <br />years I was in the tax office, I, found it almost impossible to have the land,or tax books <br />exactly accurate as to lot¥ block or house numbers, and in the past that has never in any way <br />excused a person from penalty after he had~been notifSed that his taxes were due. I believe <br />it would be a bad precedent to grs~t this petition and. therefore recommend that it not be <br />granted." <br /> <br /> Dr. Dunford moved that the recommendation of the Manager be not concurred in. <br /> The motion was lost, and by the following vote: <br /> Ayes-- Dunford, Oast, 2. <br /> Nays-- Brooks, Eaupin~ White, 3. <br /> <br /> Th~,following communications were read from the City Manager: <br /> 1st. "Attached you will <br />find bill ~f. Mr. Tom E. Gilman in the amount of $Y5.00~ handed me by. Police~officers James <br />R~udo~ph and-A. J. Flowers, for attorney's fee in defending these officers in the suit of Ers. <br />R~ H. Emery, charging false arrest. <br /> <br /> The case was tried on October 16th~ 1928, and the officers were acquitted of the charge, <br />the Court finding that they were properly performing their duty. I have invesiigated the matter <br />thoroughly and find that the officers were carrying out their duty in pmoper manner and I there- <br />fore recommend that the City pay this bill. The attached statement contains facts in the case, <br />as presented by the officers. This case is similar to the one in which the Council made pay- <br />ment of a bill of $~5.00 in defense of suit of officers Snyder, Dunn and Wh.i.tmore, in the case <br />of a Mr. Bowen against them. These officers were also exonerated. <br /> <br /> I feel that ~hen officers are sued in connection with the oerformance of th~ir:.'duty and, <br />and the Court ,end,rs a decision in their favor deciding that t~e officers were conducting <br />themselves properly and carrying out the law in making arrests~ they should not be-called <br />upon to pay attorney's fees from their salaries." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr~ ~hite, the recommendation of the-Nanager was concurred in, and a special <br />appropriation of $~5.O0 allo~ed to-pay said bill, and by the £ollowing vote: <br /> <br />Ayes-- Brooks, Dunford, Maupin, Cast, White, 5- <br /> <br /> 2nd. RecoF~ended adoption of the following resolution: <br /> "~hereas, The Virginia EIectri¢ <br />and Power Company entered into a certain contract with the City of Portsmouth bearing date <br />on the 30th day of July, 1~28,. whereby it agreed to cay, u~to the 5ity the-sum of Syl,~O for <br />the re-paving of certain streets in the city to be d~sturoed upon the removal of the ~,acks <br />of said company, which sum is to be paid upon monthly estimates as the work progresses. <br /> <br /> And ~hereas, the City has contracted with one F. J. McGuire to perform certain portions <br />~f said work; and he also to be oaid uoon monthly estimates as the war~ ~wa~ <br /> <br /> <br />