Laserfiche WebLink
July 12th, 1932- <br /> <br /> At a ~egula~ meeting of the Oity 0ounoii held July t2th, 1932 at 8:.00 P.~., there <br />we:'~e present: <br /> , <br /> Vernon A. ~ooks, ~. R. Hutoh~s, E. W. ~&aup~n~ Jr.~ ~a~o, <br /> A~chibald 0gg, J- R. stewa~t~ <br /> Also the Oity Manage~. <br /> Minutes oi ~e~la~ meeting held J~us 28th were read ~nd approved. <br /> The ~ollowing comnr~nioation from the 0ity Manage~ was ~ead: <br /> ,The petition ~o~ a reduction ~n electrical cont~aotors~ license v~as ~efe=~ed to <br /> ~eeti ~ of the 0ity 0ouncil on June 28th. <br /> me at the ~ ~ .... ~ ....... ~+ ~er~ carefully w~th the 0ity Elect~io~u, Er. ~o, <br /> I ~ve Eone ~n~o ~n~o t~q .... -~ ~ .......... +~ to ch~ge the p~esent sys- <br /> mazmncw~, ~ .... ;-- . ~,~ ~tors Which zs oase~ on a rate of <br /> Scm of license t~ zo~ ezec~ ~ <br /> without flee, as adooted by the 0ity Oo~cil, e~fective Eay 1st, 1922. <br /> I have be~n informed by the Electrical Inspecto~ that at oresent there a~e seven <br /> electrical contractors in the city who have ~aid fo~ the c-~rent year's license tax at <br /> said <br /> $101.00 each. I am also informed by ~. Ma,~he~s that none of the signatures on the <br /> petition appear on the list off electric~ contractors hs~ving license in the Oity of ports- <br /> mouth. <br /> I might also mention that one off the petitioners a sho~t time ago made a zes~ case <br /> of o~ lice~e tax in the 0o~t of Hustings and the Judge ~endered a decision in favo~ <br /> the Gity. ~ view of the Zo~egoing, I =eoo~end that no change be made in this license tax <br /> <br /> at the p~esent time." <br /> Motion of ~. Mayo t0 lay above co~unication ont able ~util next meeting and <br /> that the City Manager get inforn~ation from othe~ cities as to same, was adopted. <br /> <br /> Letter f~om Hs,~=y Spilka in reference to his complaint of the Clerk to the 0ivil <br /> Gourt, ~s received a~ o~e=ed ~iled. <br /> <br />On motion adjou:~ned. <br /> <br /> <br />