Laserfiche WebLink
rized to pay same from funds in her hands from collection of Dog ta~es. <br /> <br /> As advertized in the IPortsmouth Star~, December 3rd, 1935, the meeting at <br />this time .was opened to the public to partzc~pate in the discussi~n of the 1936 budget. <br /> <br />A delegation of school teachers ~ud members of the School Board were pres- <br /> <br /> of restoring the last <br /> <br />ent~ a~d <br /> Mr. Gaston Foote, and Miss Louise Mays spoke in favor <br />out of 6% in teachers~ salaries. <br /> <br /> A committee of the Fire Department, consisting of S.H. Hall, E.M. Richard- <br />son and KoL. Host, presented the following letter: <br /> <br /> "This committee, representing the personnel of the Portsmouth Fire Depart- <br />ment has been requested to appear before your honorable body in regard to a petition handed <br />the City Manager early in October for submission to the City Council. The petition is are- <br />quest for restoration of at least part of ou~~ wage reduction, which totalled ll per cent dat- <br />ing back to 1932; <br /> Informed of prospective reduction in the Public Safety Deoartmentts allot- <br />ment in the 1936 budget, we are appealing here as a last resort for due consideration in this <br />matter. Other cities throughout the State_have partially restored reductions in salaries. <br /> The firemen of this City are the only city employees required to work more <br />than eig~ht hours a day. For three days we work straight through, a total of seventy-two hours <br />after which we get 24 hours off. Firemen in all cities the size of Portsmouth, work shorter <br />hours under better working conditions. We do not have Sundays or ~olidays off, as do other <br />city employees. Our duties call for 2~ hours oer day s~ud even on our day off~ we are subject <br />to call, although we are claso~f_ea as Der diem employees. There is not another znstance of <br />24~hour duty firemen carried on a per d~em basis that we know of. <br /> Eighteen and one half (18½) cents per hour is our pay as per diem men, <br />~k.~6 a day. <br /> The Chiefs and officers are mont~hly pay men. Engineers and hosemen are pe~ <br />diem men, who work the same hours and are sub, eot to the smme working conditions, but are tak- <br />en off the pay roll %n event of sickness, which sometimes is caused by exposure. These condi- <br />tions are not fair[ we believe. We feel t~hat all members of the department should be carried <br />on the payroll on a monthly basis. There are at the present eleven monthly men and twenty-four <br />per diem men. <br /> Secondly: The City does not own a bed,.-~bed linens, bed clothing, uniforms <br />or rubber clothes for fire ~ighters such as are provided by other cities. The firemen of our <br />city have to furnish the above material, which are very expensiv~ and cause additional hard- <br />ships on them. We are also required to f~rnish the above-materials for substitute firemen. <br />This is equivalent to a salary re~ction, having tO~Turnish and maintain this equipment. <br /> As the cost of living has and still is advancing rapidly~ we hope this <br />honorable body will give our request most earnest and careful consideration. <br /> <br />Respectfully yours, <br /> <br />Stmuley H. Hall <br />E.M. Richardson <br />EcL. Host,~ <br /> <br /> On motion, the letter, except reference te increase <br />to the City Mana~ero <br /> <br />Mr. Long presented the pleafor free school books. <br /> <br />in pay, was referred <br /> <br />Mr, W.L. Ricks asked for consideration of increase in pay. <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Fox, the Council adjourned to meet Tuesday, December 17th~ <br /> <br />at 8:00 P.M. <br /> <br />Approved - <br /> <br />President. <br /> <br />~ityCler~. <br /> <br /> <br />