|
S@otember MOth. t94M.
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br />Leigh, Fox, Grimes~ Ha_l, Howara,
<br /> Warren, Wilson
<br />None
<br />
<br />Hut6hins,
<br />
<br />i~wrence~
<br />
<br />taken
<br />
<br />The fcl!owing ordinance~ placed on its first reading at last meeting, was
<br />
<br />"Ail OPJ)INANCE PJELATING TO THE OPERATION WITHiE TPZE LIMITS OF THE
<br />CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, MOTOR PASSENGER BUSES ENTERING THE CITY UI~q)ER
<br />PEP2~ITS GP~&NTED BY THE STATE CORPOS_~TION COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA,
<br />PRESCRIBING THE ROUTES AND T~ TEPeeS ~D CONDITIONS."
<br />
<br />Motion of 1~. Howard to lay on the table~ was adopted.
<br />
<br /> The following report of the Commissioner of Revenue for t ax
<br />1943, was presented:
<br />
<br />"To the Honcrab!e C~.t. 0ouncil,
<br />Portsmouth, Va.
<br />
<br />assessment for
<br />
<br />Gen~lemen~
<br />
<br /> I herewith report the foi!o'~ng taxable values of real estate and tangible personal
<br />property for the City of Portsmouth for the year 1943:
<br />
<br /> ESTAT
<br />
<br />~faite
<br />~olored
<br />To t al
<br />
<br />VALUE OF LOTS
<br />,9~602;960.00
<br /> 912~S55. OO
<br />10,515~S!5.OO
<br />
<br />- VALUE OF BUILDINGS TOTAL VALUE
<br /> z7,61o,9o5.o0 sT,213,S65, oo
<br /> 2,293,130.O0 ~,189,985.OO
<br /> 1~,884,035.OO 30,399,850.OO
<br />
<br />GEN. TAX 2.50
<br />680,.346.6~
<br />
<br />759,996-33
<br />
<br />~EACH INSTALMENT
<br />3~0,182.29
<br /> 39,s32.TS
<br /> 380,O15o0~
<br />
<br />SUPPLEI~NTAL AND ADJUST~NTS
<br />
<br /> Totsl 4,~O.OO
<br />
<br />21,4OOOOO
<br />
<br />26~140.OO
<br />
<br />653.5
<br />
<br />326.82
<br />
<br />SERVICE COld'ORATIONS
<br />
<br />TOtal
<br />
<br />PERSONAL PROPERTY
<br />--~ Tangible
<br /> ~ite 1,~61,240.OO
<br /> Colored q22,600;OO
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Tsx 2.50
<br />39,034~45
<br />10,566.59
<br />49,601.O~
<br />
<br />~,41!~150.OO
<br />
<br /> Machinery
<br />~41,~52.OO
<br /> l~210.OQ
<br />242,962.00
<br />
<br />110,278.79
<br />
<br />Tax 1.CO
<br /> , z7.52
<br /> 12.10
<br />
<br />2,429.62
<br />
<br /> Total Value
<br />!,802,992.O~
<br /> 423,810.00_
<br />2,226,802.00
<br />
<br /> Total Tax
<br />52,.O30.bb
<br />
<br />GRAND
<br />
<br />MAC P~NERY -
<br /> 1943
<br />
<br />TOTAL TAX CHARGED TO CITY COLLECTOR 922,959.3©
<br />
<br />SUPPLEMENTAL &ADJUS~iENTS %~NGiBLE~ERSCNAL PROPERTY
<br /> VALUE TAX 2.5
<br /> k,y--~0-/0-~ 117.50
<br /> VALUE
<br />TOTAL INCREASE Y~R 1943 over 1942 2,3b-~r~.OO
<br />
<br />TOTAL P~AL ESTATE - TA~NGIBLE PERSOnneL PROPERTY AND
<br />
<br /> 1942 O"
<br /> 34,96~. u
<br /> 865,817.?0
<br />
<br />REAL E STATE VALUES DO NGT
<br />
<br /> TAX
<br />5TZ 59. lO
<br />
<br />P~EFLECT BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ADJ~JSTY~ENTB
<br />
<br />Respectfully submitted,
<br />
<br /> increase
<br />.2 .oo
<br />
<br />57,141.60
<br />
<br />adopted.
<br />
<br /> .L.E. Turl~ngton, Commissioner of the Revenue"
<br />Motion of Mr. Fox that the Auditor charge ~=d tax to the City Collector, was I
<br />
<br /> The following letter was read, ~ud on motion of Mr. Howard, referred to the Ci-
<br />ty Manager and City Atto.ney.
<br />
<br /> Porzsmbuth Central Labor Union has instructed me to write you, ~ugges~!~g
<br /> "The
<br />that an ordinance be drawn up to parallel the Federal law for prosecuting offenders
<br />prices. I realize our oxficers~and courts are oper~t~g =t
<br /> ~ ~ ~ ~ full a~acity and-would be
<br />unable to devote any great amount of time to it, however, I believe the mor~l effect o f such an
<br />ordinance would have considerable weight.
<br /> Norfolk, Newport News, Hampton and other nearby cities have been ~oproached
<br />and are considering the drawing-up of such an ordinance.
<br /> Thanking you for past considerations, I remain
<br />
<br />Yours very truly,
<br />
<br />GeO. To Chase, Secretary."
<br />
<br />
<br />
|