January 9th, 1962
<br />
<br />properties.
<br />
<br />Mr. Donald R. Kilgore, Attorney, and Mr. Frank L. Hawkins spoke foe the rezoning of these
<br />
<br />Dr. J. W. Holley III spoke against the rezoning.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes, to remove from the table Rezoning Application ~9-61 of Mark Con-
<br />struction Company, was adopted.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Dillon, that this application be referred back ~o the Planning Commission,
<br />was adopted, without dissenting vole.
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Walker, 5o remove from the table Application ~11-61 for the George T. McLean
<br />
<br />Company, was adopted.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Leafy fha~ this application be ~eferr~d badk 5o the Planning Commission was
<br />adopted, without'dissenting vole.
<br />
<br /> 62-4 - "In a decision from the Hustings Court received on January 8th, 1962, the Judge
<br />has ruled ouL the election on the-Water Service Lines which the City Council had called for February 6th, 1962.
<br />Should the Council desire Lo do so, they may now place an Ordinance on first reading, taking over the maintenance
<br />of these lines. You may adopt the Ordinance that you had submitted for the referendum or another. I would rec-
<br />ommend that whatever Ordinance you should adopt, be effective July 1, 1962, in order that the Water DeparLmenL may
<br />have time 5o prepare 5o take over this service. This would also coincide with the Budge~ year."
<br />
<br /> Mr. Walker's motion to table the ordinance until Council meeting of January 23rd, 1962,
<br />was lost, there being no second.
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Barnes 5o adopL the following ordinance on firsL reading:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 24-55 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH,
<br />VIRGINIA, 1951, AS AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE
<br />OF WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS MADE TO WATER MAINS OF TIlE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH
<br />AFTER JULY 1, 1962."
<br />
<br /> Mr. Walker's motion to amend Section 24-55 in the second paragraph Lo read $85.00 in lieu
<br />of $50~00 was lost, there being no second.
<br />
<br />our dissenting vole.
<br />
<br />Vote being taken on Mr. Barnes' motion, the ordinance was approved on first reading, with-
<br />
<br />was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />was taken up and read:
<br />
<br /> -- UNFINISKED BUSINESS --
<br />
<br />61-347 - The following ordinance, approved on first reading aL last regular meeting,
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO CLOSE Al6 FOOT ALLEY SHOWN ON PLAT #2, JANE CASSELL'S ESTATE."
<br />Oh-mm~ien ~cMr. Atkinson, the ordinance was adopted and by the following vole:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillon, Leafy, Walker
<br /> Nays: None.
<br />
<br />61-348 - The following ordinance, approved on first reading aL last regular meeting,
<br />
<br />'~N ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT THE CONVEYANCE OF TWO PARCELS OF LAND
<br />WITHIN THE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 264."
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Dillon, the o~dinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Smith, Atkinson, Barnes, Dillon, Leafy, Walker
<br />Nays: None.
<br />
<br /> -- NEW BUSINESS --
<br />
<br /> 62-5 -. The following letter from Port Norfolk P. T. A. wss read:
<br />
<br /> "The Port Norfolk P. T. A. urges the City of Portsmouth .to take advantage of the offer
<br />extended by Norfolk County Lo use the County Delention Home until similar facilities can be provided by the City.
<br />Signed: Barry A. Cline, Secretary, Port Norfolk P. T. A."
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes that this letter be acknowledged and referred Lo conference on
<br />
<br />Juvenile Detention Home was adopted, without dissenting vole.
<br /> On motion adjourned.
<br />
<br />Approved -
<br />
<br /> President.
<br />
<br />City Clerk
<br />
<br />
<br />
|